Let's see Any Forums's opinion

what is sounding

But are trans a real threat?
Soon they will go unnoticed infiltrating all fabrics of society.
They will control the middle class while they pay homage to their overlords.
All of history will be destroyed everyone not trans or part of the elite will be reduced to slavery.

Attached: c04.gif (480x270, 1.11M)

nah bullshit semantics

I'd rather team up with feminists than with mentally ill pedos grooming children into their cult.

lol it's all collapsing dumbass. This is just the mania before the fall.

these feminists hate trans because mtfs are men and they hate men, they completely ignore or excuse ftms. they are still a bunch of man haters so who gives a shit what happens to them

>3 years in prison for words
But I thought you yank fags had muh fweedumb of peach? Maybe you need to be using those guns of yours to stop this oppression? lol who am I kidding? You cucks won't do shit even though you literally have the means to do so.

Attached: 1618953644180.png (2560x1600, 244.17K)

For how long has it been taught that one can change their gender?

found the predditor

Yeah not bullshit semantics it's what the supreme court has used for decades
>[in 1994] Court Justice Antonin Scalia [Republican] wrote: The word 'gender' has acquired the new and useful connotation of cultural or attitudinal characteristics (as opposed to physical characteristics) distinctive to the sexes. That is to say, gender is to sex as feminine is to female and masculine is to male
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gender
Just spend a few seconds looking it up

If you take the meaning of gender as masculine and feminine then at least a few decades but the basic concept of for example a girl acting like a girl and growing up and acting more like a man and dressing like a man that stuff has been going on for millennia and gender is just a word to describe it

Say what you want about America but we don't throw you in prison (yet) for saying shit that hurts people's feelings. For all the globohomo shit that's wrong with this country we can still own firearms and dunk on niggers, trannies and jews at any time

>not a semantic argument because it's a semantic argument
Nah it's just a manipulation of gendered languages. Don't know why you think a SC decision is relevant considering gendered languages have been around for far longer.

>Women are not protected against hate speech in Norway
>Men who claim to be both lesbian and a woman, are protected both on the grounds of gender identity and on the grounds of sexual orientation
Wonder if this also means those who claim to be 'queer' also get extra protections in Norway, despite zero gatekeeping as to what defines queer, other than its use as a slur prior to the definition takeover.

Way to stack the odds against her though.

You miss the part where she's from Norway, retard?

What is gender without sex?

Why can't the English read English?