How can this board outright deny that nukes exist when clearly there are plenty of footage of gigantic explosions detonating on the ground and in the air.
Nukes aren't rea-
Schizo ramblings by uneducated Amerimutts.
large amount of conventional explosives make the same effect
>irish shill thread
hi there Coner. Starting your shift?
They literally measure nuclear bombs in the amount of TNT which could create the same explosion you retard.
Millions upon millions of tons, yes.
just a "large amount"? we are talking about a humongously gargantuan pile of a fucking shitload of explosives.
smaller amounts, too
All I see is a ray harryhousen style special effect using miniature models
>No no trust me guys they split this tiny microscopic atom and it totally makes this BIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIG BOOOOOOM
People really fall for this
Why do you think that? I'm legitimately asking. The 'nukes aren't real' angle is brand new. It wasn't mentioned before 2021. Much like the 'denying space accomplishments is denying white successes' angle.
You'd need millions of tons to recreate some of the larger tests, such as Castle Bravo.
Nukes aren't fake.
The lower IQ conspiracy theorist lacks the intelligence to come to rational conclusions based on skeptical inquiry, so instead they just latch on to any belief that is contrarian. Space is fake. Nukes are fake. Magnetism is fake. etc. It doesn't occur to them that they sound like well-poisoned schizos because they can't tell the different between their beliefs and a carefully researched and nuanced belief.
>source: some jew
faggot its been going for decades
been on this website since 2005 and already saw it many times over the years
That's because we woke up to the fact that the world we live in is built on a matrix of lied perpetrated by a small cult of demonic megalomaniacal psychopaths perusing a particular long term agenda.
Now we question literally everything. And when we do the lies are full of holes.
Cognitive dissonance is a helluva drug
>you'd need six gorillion tons of TNT to create the larger tests
>meanwhile some fertilizer causes this
How do you deny Star Wars exists when there are multiple movies of it?
There's footage of it that's publicly available, various documents related to that and other tests and so on.
Do you think ICBMs are fake, too?
alright, let me elaborate:
For the last years, even more so 4 or 5 years, there has been a huge wramp up on topics like "flat earth", "space is fake" and "nukes arenĀ“t real". What do they all have in common? radical neo-obscurantism; or devolving our perception of reality back to the dark ages. Some seem to think this is intentionally made by intel agencies as something called COINTELPRO or "poisoning the well". So it means that in order to obfuscate or pamper with a certain topic you don't like, you bring upo a similar topic, but crank the ludicrousness to the max. So when people want to talk about Operation Highjump, and the hidden Antarctica underground (hollow earth), normies will immediately associated with "those tinfoil hat schizos from Any Forums who believe in flat earth". IMHO, only a shill would believe that's a common talking point in the board (haha pol is always wrong, let's vote Democratic!), when you can go right now to 4plebs, look for any flat earth thread, and check the comments ratio.
I've seen them. Funny how all the tests just stopped now that we actually have high definition cameras.
Yes and that means to measure 10000 feet you must have 10000 kings to measure their feet. Maybe you should just... I'm not going to tell you to kill yourself but... Rethink your life a bit.
Film is the highest of definitions of cameras you utter faggot.
Do you think ICBMs (and SLBMs) are fake?
I don't know. Haven't looked into it.
Recording technology has advanced tendold since those grainy old clips
>Recording technology has advanced tendold since those grainy old clips
Not really. EXPORTING technology has.
Those HD-4K re-releases of old movies?
Yeah, they're just re-scanning the original film, and doing additional color correction.
I know what film is, noob. Doesn't change the fact that recording technology is 1000x better now.
The nuke tests in the desert clearly used model houses. I bet you think we landed on the moon, that covid is real, and trans rights are human rights
Im more worried about the nigger population chimping out and destroying everything. That's the real nuke
This must be caused by thousands of pounds of TNT. Nope, just some random gas station blew up in Russia.
>Doesn't change the fact that recording technology is 1000x better now.
It really isn't though. Aside from somewhat better low-light performance.
Thats the worst part about all this. Well poisoning exists to cover real conspiracies.
Good luck trying to convince someone of something anyone can see with their own eyes in two seconds LOL
Hiroshima and Nagasaki were operational three months after the "nukening"
ZERO falloff rafiation
radiation is mostly heat
Chernobyl radiation - not real, zero evidence of cancer cases increasing
so yeah, big bombs are real but they are not detonated by "atom splitting" and if you think they are you're a moron
>Recording technology has advanced tendold since those grainy old clips
kek mutt education, analogue recordings are superiors to any digital format.
Guess where all your ultra high res blur ray versions of old series come from, yep thats right they scan the "old grany" film rolls.