Do Christians really ? BTFO.
Local Schizo
Colton Brown
Other urls found in this thread:
Alexander Murphy
The romans didn't even want to kill him
Luke Gomez
Christkikes are degenerates and they created globohomo.
Jaxson Turner
this is pretty insensitive, jesus was a jewish rabbi, he was on his way to celebrate passover (famous jewish holiday) and he didn’t like people disrespecting his holy jewish holiday, totally understandable
Brayden Lopez
YES.
Josiah Hernandez
This is literally an impossible lie the bible keeps on repeating.
In reality anyone breaking the law would be killed.
What jesus did to the money changers is literally a crime under roman law.
Logan Wright
Here keep the full resolution one.
Mason Campbell
I think you also like this.
Adrian Scott
Rate this.
Asher Flores
He wasn't executed for flipping the tables. He was executed for blasphemy.
Adam Walker
>John 8:3-11
>6 They were using this question as a trap, in order to have a basis for accusing him.
In the roman law you need three people as witness to judge someone for adultery. If Jesus had said something against her he would've broken the roman law and be tried for it.
Xavier Moore
Pilate wanted to release him.
Blake Kelly
Does roman law apply to sandniggers? Or just Romans?
William Edwards
I like how anti-Christians cite the Talmud. Why do anti-Christians believe the Talmud?
Juan Phillips
Benjamin Brooks
>Does roman law apply in roman land
Think a little before you post
Joseph Morgan
>schizo
>respected carpenter and known spiritual teacher
Hoes mad.
Ryan Reed
Based Rome! Law and order above all. Proud of Rome for taking care of the nigger problem.
William Bennett
>He wasn't executed for flipping the tables.
PROVE THIS !
> He was executed for blasphemy.
PROVE THIS !
>He wasn't executed for flipping the tables.
No idiot this is a obvious crime and anyone who reported this to the Romans would get him killed for this crime.
>b-b-b-
Go to any market or shop and like chris chan flip a table see what happens
youtube.com
>b-b-b-b the bible says
The bible says lies.
Vandalism and Assault are crimes, we know from real history what the Romans did to people who committed them, the bible says jesus committed these crimes.
Nicholas Brown
Christcucks BTFO by a nigger
Nicholas Ramirez
>as a trap
LOL what schizophrenia.
>In the roman law you need three people
No you do not. So says real history not whatever bullshit your schizo brain makes up.
>In the roman law
Roman Law ? Some days before you tried to pull this shit only it was jewish law.
Stop making up lies.
>If Jesus had said something against her he would've broken the roman law and be tried for it.
Cope.
Jeremiah Garcia
wait you think Roman law was the same for non citizens?
Lmao
Austin Ward
I'm just posting the verse you have quoted in that image. You are contradicting yourself.
Oliver Young
>2000 years.
>Jews still mad about their shekels.
Camden Howard
>If Jesus had said something against her he would've broken the roman law and be tried for it.
This debunks your religion.
>b-b-b-b
This debunks your religion.
>b-b-b-b I do not understand
This debunks your religion.
Call me when god can write his non ironic book not full of lies.
>Be god
>need to tell something to humans
>say nothing
>Act like a local schizo and chris chan 1 CE edition.
>die
>Your followers write down your schizo street adventures
>This becomes the most important book of your religion
Hey can god not tell the people writing this shit
>Hey do not write down this time I was schizo and needed to lie, here let me tell you exactly how I behaved and my inner motivations.
If you admit these are lies jesus tells to not get killed then your religion is officially debunked.
Adam Cooper
>Does roman law
All the jews are officially "subject of the roman empire" in that time and under roman law
Zachary Barnes
>Pilate wanted to release him.
This is literally a lie the bible says.
>b-b-b-b
Prove that ! Other then the cult who stole his body and told you lies about jesus is saying so.
>b-b-b-b-
This behavior is literally illegal for any roman magistrate.
>b-b-b-b my super special "release 1 criminal free day"
This also literally never happened.
WE have 1000s of legal documents about Roman Law FROM THAT TIME telling you this.
Kevin Lee
You're speaking nonsense. Explain to me how does that debunk anything.
And here, let me spoonfeed you about how witness worked back then
>11.39. 3. Note. The foregoing law provides, first, that every witness must take an oath, which had been the general rule; second, that the testimony of men of honorable standing should be preferred to that of others; third, that the testimony of one witness should not suffice to prove a cause.
Charles Gutierrez
>wait you think Roman law was the same for non citizens?
Citizens have better protections then subjects.
Cameron Brooks
Joseph Cruz
>WE have 1000s of legal documents about Roman Law FROM THAT TIME telling you this.
Good thing there's thousands of them. You only need to post one to prove me wrong.
Noah Long
.39. 3
What are you even quoting ?