Harry Potter series was incredibly anti deep state and anti-gov. Everything was trad. Rowling hates trannies. Goblins are obvious kike stand-ins and are rightly detested. Faggots are shown to be incompetent, pompous jokes (Gilderoy Lockheart)
How did it become so sucked into globohomo despite all this?
There are people who make their whole identity about consooooming Harry Potter. These people are very weak, stupid, and impressionable. They will believe whatever they hear. Most of what they hear is directly from the globalist elites.
I bet a man wrote it and the female writer part is a psyop to get women interested
I say this cause some glowie said the same shit about Shakespeare quoting this book as a source >The Art Of English Poesie, first edition. In it the high Elizabethan minds describe to you the art of spelling and enchantment, as well as all the arts of hiding messages in text, in plain sight, for those in the know. The message of the book was largely lost in reprinting, you need a FACSIMILE edition of the first edition of the work. You can easily find and download it. It's by the same people who were Shakespeare, the Society of Letters. They are responsible for the Enlightenment and their enemies are essentially the usual suspects, who of course emulate their methods. sourcetext.files.wordpress.com/2017/12/arte_english_posie_1589.pdf
dumbledor is a big big gay super super gay and likes big cocks.
Jeremiah Long
Op is Harrypilled Order of the phoenix redpills textbook propaganda. Also, the antagonists knowingly pass lies as truth. The audience knows the truth and so do the protagonist. But the antagonist are ignoring the evidence of truth on purpose to push their agenda.
The Order of the Pheonix is a deeply reactionary book. This is the point where all institutions are subverted (including academia, media, and law enforcement), and it is social suicide to question evil and speak truth. They end up creating a subversive vanguard that meets in secret, which is exactly what will be necessary to do IRL moving forward.
Harry is also a true aristocratic hero in a variety of ways. He has noble lineage, not only is he a wizard but his paternal line is supposedly a descendant of Godric Gryffindor, and somebody in his family acquired the legendary invisibility cloak. Further, a defining aspect of his character is his dedication to his morals and his folk.
There's widespread agreement that the first three books were shadow-written and Rowling was just the face of it. What followed was written by her and is decidedly worse.
I'd know more about the theory if I cared about Harry Potter at all, but I don't, so that's all I can give you on it.
Mason Lopez
>How did it become so sucked into globohomo despite all this? Everything becomes globohomo on a long enough timeline.
Wyatt Wright
except the cloak belongs to death Satanic as fuck
Joseph Thomas
There's a Hogwarts vidya coming out which takes place in the 1800s. The plot involves putting down a goblin rebellion, and has already caused oy veying. Its on the games wiki page.
Jace Sanchez
checked and I dont care what anyone else says, JK is fucking based.
Nah that's just a myth it was made by a wizard who's Harry's ancestor
Isaiah Morris
Wrong. Wrong. Harry Potter is not based. Harry Potter is a guide book for turning kids into activists. The essential message of the book is pro miscegination and anti traditionalist. The only reason you think it is based is because the author is currently a pariah against the LGBT mob, but you forget the decades she was a staunch feminist and supported the policies that destroyed her ancestors country.
The later books read like antifa fanfics (order of phoenix = anifa cell). The goblins being akin to jews is just unconscious association, not intentional. Finally the Christian mothers reaction to this series was in retrospect correct, all this social justice shit was catalyzed by HP.
I'd ponder that orb deep and hard, if you know what I mean. You probably don't.
Chase Stewart
Umbridge was the most evil character. What was she? A ministry bureaucrat fanatically devoted to the state's control over education, who smiled sweetly while torturing students who spoke malinformation that contradicted the ministry's narrative of Truth. Voldemort was sympathetic in comparison. Umbridge was a more effective villain because she was real. She got carried off and gang-raped by centaurs in one of the latter books. In mythology, Centaurs carried women off to rape them, and Rowling knew what she was implying by having Umbridge carried off screaming by them.
Grayson Hall
If you think about it the Slytherins are basically like Jews: cunning and deceptive. The purebloods have extremely inbred families (Lestrange, Black) and suffer from a high rate of mental disorders (Bellatrix). They hate the goyim (muggles) and want to rule over them as cattle. Voldemort is like king Jew. He does literal blood sacrifice rituals and is obsessed about gaining immortality. His underlings are literally all losers (lumpenproles) who resent the successful members of society. Gryffindor is basically the opposite and represents the Aryan spirit: fearless, courageous, and incorruptible.
Not sure if its "based", but its not tranny faggot nigger shit. Was there even a nigger in Harry Potter?
Actually HP is based now that I think about it. No homo faggot shit, hierarchy, Harry needs to actually learn and struggle, Hermione was hot as fuck and was never a feminist cunt.
Anthony Evans
I disagree. I see the order as a militia arming themselves so that they can compete with their government. The reason for secrecy is because of the repercussions of building a militia to challenge the power structure. Antifa is Malfoy and his cronies ratting them out to the Pink Bitch
Juan Wood
I like harry potter and I hate fags, trannies and shitskins.
the pr team is just trying to sell more books in this new generation. this is a sales ploy. nothing more
Gavin Davis
100% and I can't see any other way to read it. They have all the power and run their little red shirt goon squad. Also over regulating the shit out out of everything so you can't take a shit without breaking the rules.
Henry Williams
>jewish intellectual with communist sympathies writes a book smearing the Russian Royal Family so their murder seems less evil. They had one male heir, beset by enemies everywhere, and they were desperately trying to find anyone who could heal his hemophilia.
Jackson Wood
just some dumb as lib parents who have already subconsciously swayed their child that way. the child is using harry potter to make sense of the parents bias's
Based. At least Voldemort more or less knew he was "evil", that horrible bitch is a real villain, the type we deal with today. I'd go as far to say as she's one of the most dislikable characters in fiction I've ever seen. I've dealt with her kind directly. Basically that pyscho HR bitch but with real power. The type of "experts" ordering lockdowns.
Owen Wilson
ANTIFA is the Slytherin posse ratting everyone out to the government(Voldemort)
Sebastian Green
Probably because Harry Potter is one of the dullest franchises in the history of movie franchises. Seriously each episode following the boy wizard and his pals from Hogwarts Academy as they fight assorted villains has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the series’ only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of special effects, all to make magic unmagical, to make action seem inert.
Perhaps the die was cast when Rowling vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; she made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody, just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for her books. The Harry Potter series might be anti-Christian (or not), but it’s certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.
>a-at least the books were good though "No!" The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs."
I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowling's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King.
Yeah, their 1800s britland is full of happas and anything but English people
Joseph Martinez
>clifford version
checked and based, you are doing Gods work
Sebastian Nelson
>falling for the pasta. Newfag, reddit or bot?
Jace Miller
>movie Stopped reading there. Clearly we are talking about the books, faggot.
Isaiah Harris
Finally someone with some fucking sense. Harry Potter isn't "based". Whatever schizo right wing themes OP thinks are in the books are absolutely unintentional, if not non-existant. Harry Potter is liberal propaganda. Period.
JK Rowling also isn't "based". She's a liberal whore who happens to have made trannies angry because she doesn't want to share her female perks with them, despite her own books helping pave the way for globohomo bullshit we see today. If Rowling wasn't a woman and people like OP weren't cumbrained simps, no one would be trying defend either the books or author.
Robert Green
It was Star Wars Episode 7 Force Awakens, one of the biggest turds in cinematic history. I think he specifically cry peaked when Harrison Ford was revealed, "Its all real". Only good line in the entire nu-homo trilogy.