What is Any Forums's opinion on colonialism?

Honestly Any Forums.

Attached: Dutch & Spanish Formosa.png (250x287, 31.88K)

Imperialism and colonialism are evil
Make the land part of your homeland instead

It's disgusting. Stealing land from people is very bad

we
wuz
taiwan

It's still around, just corporate and soulless.

Any Forums dindu nuthin it was the anglo jews and the dutch jews and it is still thems that is doing it fo facts

Attached: 1614169457317.jpg (1381x1750, 1.9M)

What else motivated the Ionians and the Hebrews to pursue other lands?

Might makes right. If you can’t hold on to your lane claims, you lose them. Simple as.

Attached: ACB44331-D9EE-4E8F-80B3-D2041D97BF58.jpg (1018x690, 360.92K)

Chinese got to that island first and Falklands are not yours.

slavery too yo

Attached: h.jpg (2046x1693, 1.53M)

colonialism doesn't exist anymore. The world isn't a small place anymore. If you are not paying attention to the rest of the world why are you even claiming to be a country?

America uses "gunboat diplomacy" to spread degeneracy, no different to Babylon of old.

Ionians ran out of space cause Greece is a mountainous land, the whole reason we're THE merchant marines is because the sea is all we had

Colonialism is bad because later the colonized will be able to migrate back to your homeland and destroy it from within

An Apartheid Israeli would know.

Attached: adam sandler.png (326x409, 177.85K)

Greek/Italian colonialism was based. Anglos/Germans did a good job. Spanish was a disaster due to creating spics.

That is a post-war construct pursued by Americans. America like Carthage is a Colony turned Empire.

Spain made the best colonialism system of all.

It's just another part of China. The day after it's liberated, no one will pretend to give a fuck ever again.

No Chinese only began settling Formosa after Dutch cemented their claim to it.

I agree with this assessment. Genovese/Venetian colonies were present in Crimea for instance.

And flooded the world with violent brown mongrels. Germs/Anglos, in most cases, were not mixing with locals or were doing it rarely.

Ancient chinese get to that island first sir, they used it has a fishing stop or something, there are a lot of archaeological rests

Watch Africa Addio and find out what happens when you grant niggers freedom.

Attached: 40f6fbf5c438459a4b62407ecb7f1c169e42bcabr1-247-236v2_00.jpg (247x236, 12.95K)

Spain created universities, american indios had rights, even the old governators like incas or mexicas still mantained their nobelty tittles.

Angloes just genocided the natives, which is kinda based.

The Indigenous Formosans (Siraya etc) were the original inhabitants of Formosa. They are the Original Austronesians.

Britain had very much the same issue once the industrial revolution had kicked in.

Those not sir, the ancienr ones were chinese search it

There's a difference between how you handled the Americas and how you handled Africa though. You know how the balkan policy on land aquisition is

I have. Han Chinese were not present till 16th century. It was recorded by the Chinese much earlier as "Eastern Savages" but wasn't settled by them till 16th century. Dutch actually encouraged Chinese immigration.

Difference is Africans were disease resistant and had Iron Weapons, also much more aggressive. Different Kettle of Fish as we say.

Yeah they were not han, but they share the same ancestors

Didn't Rhodesia and South Africa have a stable settler base?