I need mah gun so I can fite da ebil gubmint

>I need mah gun so I can fite da ebil gubmint
>drone flows miles above
>drops payload
>*boom*
>your gun does nothing

Attached: 9D56E5A9-C036-4F05-9A04-AC25AA527C94.jpg (800x625, 156.29K)

Other urls found in this thread:

hawaii.edu/powerkills/NOTE1.HTM
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

And yet, the Taliban

I love how libtards fantasize about drone bombing americans

Nice try but wrong faggot

Somebody post the ol screencap

This

>the government will drone strike anyone who opposes it
>so you don't need guns because this would never happen like you think anyways
We are so fucked

Attached: 1634093077584.png (512x480, 94.5K)

Casually makes a comic about the military bombing its own citizens
>pretty sure this is what the founding fathers we're afraid of

OK I get it our guns are useless,
So you won't mind if we keep them?
Good. Crisis solved we keep our useless guns.

This cartoon agrees with the larping boomer though. What government drones its own citizens, oh wait Obama droned citizens.

The taliban aren’t diabetic hicks. All we have to do is blockade the diabetes meds and Diet Coke and you yokels will surrender

No, unhinged gun nuts shoot up malls, schools, and grocery stores

Attached: 1AC73374-5233-4CD8-A815-29B3C2BFB4EE.jpg (1200x985, 284.56K)

I don't understand the argument here. The government can kill people with drone strikes so therefore gun rights shouldn't exist? Wtf?

This post doesn't even qualify as bait but as a thought experiment let's take it seriously. What would happen if, without any sort of building of tensions at all, the US government began drone striking dissidents?

Attached: 1647051563152.png (639x638, 725.5K)

Mall shooters are groomed by retard faggots nazis like you

>You dont need guns
Not for you to decide
>cops will fight the criminals for you
You mean the super evil racist cops faggots like you are trying to defund?
>now give up your gun
No.

actually, I'm tired of paying bills, go ahead and bomb my house, i'll be there after 6pm

It’s true, that drones make it easier.tw2pt

You are retarded if you think any soldier would bomb their own people

lol the cops sit outside for an hour waiting for the shooter to run out of ammo

>Not for you to decide
Yes If strangers are in danger of getting shot by you because you have a tiny dick

>What would happen if, without any sort of building of tensions at all, the US government began drone striking dissidents?
That some people will vote even harder, after that chaos.

They will if they’re insurrectionists. I’ll
Happily man the drone

Attached: C5878A7D-B635-45F5-8EFD-C97E6B110B9B.jpg (845x597, 96.66K)

>All we have to do is blockade the diabetes meds and Diet Coke and you yokels will surrender
Spoken by someone who has no idea who produces virtually everything they consume on a daily basis, this is pretty funny.

>387439526
>if you dont obey us we will use the armed forces of the state to kill you
is this supposed to be an argument for trusting the federal government?

>Gun grabbers being hopelessly obsessed with other mens penises
Many such cases

>You are retarded if you think any soldier would bomb their own people

The biggest cause of mass death in history is death by government:

hawaii.edu/powerkills/NOTE1.HTM

They see this as refuting the point that firearm ownership serves as a safeguard against the government. It doesn't refute that point at all but they see it this way.
To answer my own question, I think if people's houses started getting flattened, we would see the very rapid defeat of the US government because no one wants to live like that.

Lmao I'll bet you would, tubby
Post arm, I need a good laugh

Is this advocating for even lesser arms control? Clearly its saying that they not only need guns but whole navies and airforce

Imagine being such a slave you tolerate the military or any agency using drones against Americans.

Someone post the screencap of drones not able to standing on the corners of the streets.

Drones cannot stand on a street corner and enforce no assembly edicts. Tanks cannot search your house for contraband. A police state needs POLICE to function, and police can be fought by ordinary men.

Is this supposed to make me want to give up my guns?

>USA flag
>drone flows
VPN chink

If anything it's saying the government has no reason to fear its citizens so why not let them have their peashooters
OP self BTFOd lmao

>leftist comic
>strawman physically deformed and emotionally irrational
this

Both sides are pretty retarded.

A government wont dronestrike random civilians. Mostly because 100% of its soldier's families are neighbors with the civlians you plan on dronestriking. Maybe when we replace all soldiers with drones like in star wars.
it WILL dronestrike specific groups if you organize like Waco or MOVE and you cross the line from wacky instagram "militia" to domestic terrorism.
it WONT dronestrike "everyone on the other side of politics". It literally cant without killing 70% of american civilians.

Civilians wont rise agains the US government. This doesnt need an explanation, they simply wont. The third panel wont happen, not only because the US gov wont dronestrike civilians, but also because the first two panels wont (dont, didnt) happen.
Reminder that most of this board is american gun owners that genuinely believe the election was stolen by a shadow government cabal of satanist pedophiles, that western civilization has less than 8 years left and that international agencies are working overtime to make them live in ze pod and eat ze bug. But the time isnt right.
Soon tho! Real soon.

Attached: 1657627323811.jpg (1024x501, 83.38K)

>implying the US gov would bomb its own infrastructure
boomers are retarded

Attached: 9F4544FE-3739-4EC7-AD13-5EA0DD799CEE.png (481x659, 295.08K)

Any “racial” unity of the Greeks was therefore only the organic unity of culture
or language, but never became political: such people would never tolerate losing
the sovereignty in the states they and their recent ancestors had established to
protect their freedom and space to move. But to draw any parallels to our time is
absurd: these men would have never submitted to abstractions like “human
rights,” or “equality,” or “the people” as some kind of amorphous entity
encompassing the inhabitants of the territory or city in general. They would have
rightly seen this as pure slavery, which is our condition today: no real man
would ever accept the legitimacy of such an entity, which for all practical
purposes means you must, for entirely imaginary reasons, defer to the opinion of
slaves, aliens, fat childless women, and others who have no share in the actual
physical power. How is it possible for all to have an equal share in the state and
a full demand on its resources, when they in fact possess no actual physical
force: and if you think this question through, you will understand also the nature
of our subjection in this time. Because it is not these people who are at fault, but
a hidden power that uses them as a pretext. Modern “democracy” is totalitarian
and vicious, and tries to subject the best to the rule of the heaps of biological
refuse and most especially to the rule of those who can stir them up. The military
men who constitute its external defense and its internal police forces should in
principle never accept this condition.

Attached: 1657643055361.jpg (427x427, 90.55K)

Attached: War of attrition.png (872x886, 219.82K)

Cope Cletus. And if you don’t believe me, the French national guard shot at the barricades during their revolutions. Victor Hugo even romanticized about the 1832 revolution in Les Miserables. That’s to say nothing of the Civil War or integration

Attached: 47CED0B8-A8AA-417B-9FF8-28113BBF0380.jpg (620x500, 231.29K)

>government bombs its own people on home soil
>government at that point ceases to be a government
>part of the army defects
>army, even right now, is outnumbered 1,000 to 1 with civilians

Yeah good luck

>can’t stop thinking about the size of gun owner’s cocks
faggot

as soon as the drone bombing starts, suddenly there will be hundreds of lone wolf snipers in every state.
no gov official would be able to show their face outside ever again.

>A government wont dronestrike random civilians.
There are multiple instances of this happening.

yeah wait a minute, this is so true lol. if the government is so powerful and has superior firepower, they why do shitlibs care if white people have guns? why would the government care?

>using a weapon that costs hundreds of thousands of dollars to arm and sortie against a guy with his $200 lego gun
Yeah, that sounds totally likely to happen.

Wow crazy how this tech wasn't available in afganistan

Op your shilling is out of date
>See afganistan and the taliban

Yes we know you're a fat, weak loser

Libs still think this is a clever rebuttal

still waiting faggot...anyday now...

Attached: Drones sure kek.png (1000x496, 162.28K)

>that amount of fagotts that thinks that the US goverment wouldnt drop a bomb in their own soil
>havent heard about MOVE bombing

"B-but they where niggers!"
Doesnt make a difference, any liberal tranny in the US army will glady drop a bomb on you.

Attached: images - 2022-07-19T090234.918.jpg (452x679, 84.68K)

"Random" ("domestic terrorist", but still) civilian in his own house? Their own civilian population?
When?
I can literally only think of Waco and MOVE.

You might not realize it, but you are my neighbor so you're getting blown up too.

Attached: Screenshot_20220713-065542_DuckDuckGo.jpg (1438x376, 158.54K)

Motherfuckers right in front of our poor flag

>The taliban aren’t diabetic hicks
That's exactly what they are you fucking retard.

This post echoes my time in Ickheria.

Ooh OOh, I'd put a cool flag overlay on my socials.

They're going to bomb residential neighborhoods where dissenters live?

Sounds like another good plan with no repreccussions at all Joe!

>drone your own citizens
>gets the entire world mobilized to take out the tyrannical US government
You're not very bright are you?

Attached: 1658121618090795.png (1920x1080, 1.39M)

Attached: 1653450662092.png (698x730, 751.73K)