Is Polygamy a bad idea?

JUST A ROBOT.

Because when you have a population of men in your society who can't get pussy, one of two things happen: you either send them war with your neighbor to steal their pussy, or they start a civil war and try and steal your pussy.

A society with a bunch of young single men with no mating prospects is inherently unstable.

Its basically Old Testament, where 20% of the Chad have 80% of the women, but instead of pump and dump, then lock them down and keep them filled with babies until they finally die in childbirth(and then another young girl gets bought from her family and goes into the breeding rotation).

Attached: Screenshot_20220713-202622-400.png (1080x1251, 1.05M)

Attached: C9BBD971-24BE-4EF8-920E-6D4F91D71B33.jpg (702x1511, 837.29K)

There was a whole massive explanation about why monogamous marriage is a cornerstone of civilization. Basically it’s guaranteed pussy for betas in exchange for labour, which makes civilization flourish. Polygamy breaks that in the same way that hypergamy does. The ideal state is 1 man, 1 woman + legalized, safe prostitution like in Ancient Rome or Greece.

Muslims don’t “make it work”. Very tiny percentage actually have multiple wives, and even in strict sharia countries very rarely do the wives actually live together. Essentially it amounts to having to buy separate homes for your multiple families and cycle between them, not having this cool harem of bitches that you’re imagining.

It gives beta males a chance...it was conceived around the time of the Romans...prior to that real men had many wives.
The obvious consequence has become obvious.

What happens when more than one of them wants your undivided attention at the same time? People aren't computers, you hyper autist.

I should look into that.

>state subsidized polygamy
Is that the child support system or did you mean something else?

Why in the world is gayness degenerate? We lowered rates of sexual abuse in the first world and the LGBT incidence rate skyrocketed.

Look at muslim societies. They are full of single men in radical organizations willing to kill you on the street over something or wage wars.
1:1 relationships secure a partner for most and societies with them are more peaceful on average.
If you are hyper successful you could run a harem, but you have to really have your shit together. With muslims religion hammers the women down, in the west you are always competing with the woman since every single one past the 60s is a feminist or a product of feminism.

Additional point: women on average love to start shit between their men if there is any competition. Those niggers shooting each other ? Half the time it is women starting shit with other men and them doing honor killings.
A lot of violence during civil times is a product of females fucking around and not telling their partners. A lot of it.
Unrestricted sexuality causes conflict, that is why even couples kissing in public causes unpleasant stares. Parading sexuality around like the carnival of Rio or gay parades is simply a bad idea for the peace of a society. We are a sexually competitive species. Violence is on the table even for weaklings once sex is involved.

Attached: capture-3.png (778x516, 174.63K)

It works just fine and is good eugenics. High status males should have a extra wife or two since that would enable more good genes spreading thru out society in the next generation. Now the prevailing fear against polygamy is that it would result in low status males being unable to breed because women would flock to superior males which would ultimately lead to said class of sexless males becoming frustrated and taking their grievances out on society.

Personally, I think this fear is overblown and not applicable to modern society. Low status males are not even breeding anyway and are placated by video games, anime, and porn so they're not going to chimp out from not having sex like they might have in the past. Realistically they'll just neet it up and off themselves in their 30s when they realize their life is beyond repair. And as far as i'm concerned this is a good evolutionary pressure, men that can't acquire a woman have genes that most likely should not be passed down. The proliferation of bad genes leads too human suffering

As for the lower status/wageslaving males that do have the charisma/social skills to acquire a female, they'll be fine since the pool of women reserved for them would be too undesirable for the high status males with multiple wives anyway.

I think you're wrong about honor killings, and I think you're absolutely psycho for fixating on "multiple wives". What stops women from having multiple husbands? You can bond everyone if you get rid of patriarchy.

Pair bonding, you engage in enough casual sex and it gives you the same symptoms as PTSD. All the problems with the LGBTBBQ community (the disease, the abuse, the low impulse control) make more sense when you realize the majority of them have some level of brain damage.

You will be a woman someday

Attached: 1656170002278.jpg (324x251, 34.21K)

You can pull enough historical stories of wars being waged over a pretty woman and I've talked to enough ghetto niggers to have heard their side of the story.
Of course I would fixate on harems. Those are for men who are winners.
A woman with multiple husbands is a woman surrounded by simpls and losers and using them. It's a very unnatural thing for humans.