People who called everyone "anti-vaxxers" for questioning a dangerous and untested product

..... when those people tried to warn you of the potential for harm, or tried to show you corresponding data...... what did you think their motive was?

I got banned, demonetized, shunned, attacked, name-called etc... just for bringing up concerns..

People went from hating big pharma, the most distrusted companies, in the most distrusted industry, to getting tattoos and being proud of their mindless obedience.

So for all those people who tried to warn you, why did you think they were trying to inform you?

And if you used the word "disinformation" or "misinformation" KYS

Attached: vaxfax.png (1267x1417, 134.57K)

They're not humans. They're golems

I would be soooo embarrassed

The term anti-vaxxer was introduced long before the s-protein products against people who rejected actual vaccines for them and their children - pic rel.
as these were like flat earthers and similarly ridiculed, the term was ideal to be used against gene therapy critics.
nobody likes to be ridiculed and shamed publicly so everyone but the strongest (and the ones who simly do not give a fuck) left the sanity-camp.
at this point it could be a danger so society if truth ever came out, so they make sure that there will never be certainty - by not supporting the collection of proper data, by not doing actual trials etc.

Attached: vaxx.png (1681x3194, 800.45K)

Interesting.

What seemed unique about this to me, was that they changed the definition for what a vaccine was, and they tried to lump it in with all other vaccines.

Do you think they will ever admit they were wrong?

When their kid dies

When they get disabled etc..

When Fauci gets investigated?

Or do you think they're already dead set in their ways and choose to disbelieve anything, that's the contrary"

I remember wondering why they pushed the "anti-vaxxer" meme so FUCKING hard in the msm in the mid 2010's. Now i know why. Media controls most normaltards so it makes sense.

Some will admit it, some won't. I know some open-minded "centrists" who have decent IQ's, and some really low IQ retards who treat TV broadcasts like religious sermons... hell, even worse. I'm a Catholic and i know way fewer dogmatic catholics than dogmatic vaxxtards.

I doubt Fauci will ever get in trouble.

>implying that any vaccine is anything other than jew poison
ngmi

Attached: spanishflu.png (802x359, 95.78K)

>tried to show you corresponding data
The problem with Facebook scientists is literally anyone can post any data, and you faggots eat it up because it's contrarian
This happens every fuckin time and I'm surprised you all haven't woken up to this yet, because you fall for it constantly

>Someone makes a new drug in a lab
>No long-term safety testing whatsoever

Mate, it's not 'contrarianism'. It's plain common sense. I don't know why you retards keep doing this to yourselves lol

>Do you think they will ever admit they were wrong?
it has been made sure that this cannot happen. imagine you've voluntarily injected not just yourselves but your children with something. your brain will fight like hell to reject the idea that this was poison. you'd rather publicly call for everyone who says so to be put in death camps.
only if there is super hard data which on top of that is presented as permanently and omnipresently as the shilling for the vaccination was, only then there might have a chance of accepting the truth at scale.
however, it is _impossible_ for there to _ever_ be hard data. any evaluation of vaxx efficacy always is observing behaviour of groups in real life which is always bound to biases. this means there will always be a 'way out' in coming up with reasons why this and that study can be dismissed. you can see that all over the place.
the only way to avoid that would be a large scale double blind trial. and that is impossible. forever. there simply is no one left for this. even if you went ahead with funding and actually tried to set up a new trial now, you would not be able to find enough people who until now resisted injection and now accept to be injected with it. you'd need to go to africa to find a group large enough but then you'd have a whole other bias in your selection.

Attached: vaxxx.png (2000x6350, 1.37M)

The most annoying part of this is that there will be no "I told you so" moment. They won't move through the 5 stages of grief, they'll just live in denial+anger+depression at the same time from their first negative symptom to their last breath. The idea that they and billions of others who trusted the establishment were wrong is too much to bear.

They will likely never admit it. I still get told I chose to be shunned from society because I didn't get vaxxed.

Woulda been better in the long run to let people make their own healthcare decisions. Mandating an experiment where the experimenter has no liability and doesn't have to be fully transparent was a retarded thing to do.

Attached: Super Reddit Science.jpg (1024x2048, 312.45K)

It may be immature, but I lust for that moment.

LOL. I'm referring to all the top doctors that were deplatformed. All the doctors from the COVID-19 A Second Opinion Senate hearing.

Even posting that hearing got me banned on YouTube. Why slander Doctors and scientist that actually work with and treat patients?

"The Science"

What will admitting they were wrong accomplish? They are still fucked.

I read in another thread that he is retiring at the end of the year. He is riding off into the sunset, untouched and mission accomplished.

True. I leaned left until all this shit... never again. Dems are trash liar pussies.

Do you guys think anyone will be held accountable?

I heard that because they've found out it actually does affect your DNA, that they may be liable for genetic discrimination now.


WTF did people think when Joe Rogan just had the top heart doctor in the world and the guy who invented mRNA tech on.... Neil Young takes his music off Spotify and they try to zerg Jo Ro with trans / black stuff.

so true
now we know where all the atheists went