Why is the US against a multipolar world? Why act as the police of the world? wouldn't the US be much more prosperous if it spent war money at home? what would be the threat of not starting a war every couple of years and having military bases around the world? I can't see anyone starting a war with the US or trying to invade it. If you invested the money you blow on wars on technology and industry, you'd be self-sufficient by now.
Can someone who really understands about geopolitics explain this to me?
Tyler Stewart
Other urls found in this thread:
benjaminfulford.net
youtube.com
amazon.com
twitter.com
David Williams
Because the USA doesn't do what it does for it's own interest, it's a golem of Israel due to the fact that they allowed dual citizens from Israel deep into their political system thus dragging everyone along with them.
John Scott
We are israels little bitch and we love sucking that herpes-blistered diseased cock right down the throat after anal.
Andrew Watson
because (((they))) are fighting a spiritual war against nature
Angel Allen
Dominic Cox
the survival of the dollar relies on the consumption of capital from other currencies, it relies on eating economies
it has to be this way
Gabriel Rodriguez
Knowledge shared is power divided friend
You share power with your enemies
They will eventually suvert and
Overthrow you
Power is a zero sum game
There can be only one and when youre
The one everyone is out to get you
Daniel Walker
This is true, the US savings rate has gone negative. The US economy requires syphoning wealth out of the rest of the world just to keep running.
Josiah Green
>Why is the US against a multipolar world?
The open secret is that the United States produces next to nothing anymore
The only reason our currency is worth anything at all is because it's a currency that's used around the world
The moment another great power comes up and people have the choice to vote with their money which group they would like to support, dollars will flood back in to circulation in the mainland and we'll be drowned in inflation
Jack Smith
>it relies on eating economies
That's retarded, globohomo thrives on international trade and expanding foreign economies not the other way around
Dylan Cruz
>Politicians paid off by China, Russia, Ukraine and Mexican/South America cartels.
Why is shit so fucked up?
Isaiah Wood
youtube.com
if you really think the IMF is focused on "expanding economies" you are naive
Hunter Allen
Other countries wouldn't trade with the US if they weren't getting something out of it. What they get is a currency more reliable than their own and many get some kind of other deal like protection
Grayson Campbell
But who could that be? There's nobody to replace the US anytime soon.
Luis Barnes
Economoc growth is a direct consequence of global trade, its undeniable
Sebastian Turner
Through alliances and treaties, loans and marriages, and good old handshakes, London runs the Western Hemisphere.
The general strategy is to empower your enemies enemies.
Israel, Japan, Colombia, Libya, South Korea are all intended to be puppet governments that erode regional cohesion.
Turkey and Iran cannot be let to unite Mudslimes, as that is generally thought to be the overarching great threat to western culture.
Israel exists to destabilize and was born of European oligarchs
Kayden Barnes
there doesn't need to be an adversary
a currency that doesn't have a physical tether is an enemy of its own supply, it HAS to blow up eventually it is just math (unless extra liquidity can be found by exploiting countries)
and? what are you even saying
Andrew Morris
Our dollar is backed by our hegemony essentially. Simple as
Lincoln Campbell
Oliver Lewis
Is this some kind of goldbug argument? Begone, boomer
>and? what are you even saying
The US heavily facilitates international trade, even where it isn't part of it. This has lead to massive growth in foreign nations. If the US "eats" other economies, it does so after helping them grow first
Jace Nelson
>The US heavily facilitates international trade, even where it isn't part of it.
Lol no, the very single greatest issue in international transactions is the Dollar.
Jaxson Richardson
>What they get is a currency more reliable than their own
If it was a completely voluntary transaction. The US dollar is only valuable as long as trade is conducted and commodities are priced in USD.
If the US military was not on a spree of foreign invasions they US as a superpower would be already gone succumbing to the fate of the USSR. Look at what happened in Afghanistan, Iraq and Libya. All of these countries were invaded because they wanted to sell their oil form something other than the USD.
I have no problem with Americans but the US, the system as it currently stands with its corporate government, is a plight upon the world. Its savings rate is negative, its trade balance is in a deficit. These numbers prove, that the country consumes what value is created elsewhere in exchange of monopoly paper money.
Ryder Green
How about you make an argument based off of the book instead of expecting me to read the entire thing in the middle of a discussion
John Sanchez
>If the US military was not on a spree of foreign invasions they US as a superpower would be already gone succumbing to the fate of the USSR. Look at what happened in Afghanistan, Iraq and Libya. All of these countries were invaded because they wanted to sell their oil form something other than the USD.
Afghan was invaded because of other reasons, and you know it. Far darker reasons.
Asher Ortiz
>he doesn’t know we’re going full unipolar globohomo
Ngmi
Andrew Moore
Memeflag, post ignored
>muh petrodollar
Another boomer meme, usd is used for far more reasons than oil or other commodities
Andrew Bennett
It makes sense when you realize Leftism is a religion on a global crusade to seek the destruction of heretics and non-believers, much like every other religion.
Liam Martin
To answer your questions:
Money
Money
No
Not having enough money
USA is a parasite that thrives of wars and conflicts. It started dying off (known as the great depression), but war broke out and it was saved.
Noah Turner
>US industry moves into poor country
>creates estimate of valuation of resources, liquid assets, possible tourism etc..
>purposefully lowers valuation knowing there is more value that can be extracted
>country takes loans that allow them to fulfill "development contracts" based on lower valuations
>valuations are raised
>loan payments are raised
>country can't pay loans
>is forced to accept worse contracts, give away land, resources, sell off currencies
is that enough?