Why monarchy doesn't work

With democracy, you can have two parties which are the same pile of shit - and a self-hating nation that can't get along at any point in time.

Over time, parties turn into different sets of lunatics who each BELIEVE that their ideology is the correct one, spending years arguing with other lunatics about why they're correct - basing their arguments off fallible logic in a closed-off, idealized scenario.

Besides, the one thing that is bound to fail at all times regardless of the system is the most "potent" one denying their "destiny" and refusing to reach for the stars.

Iq is .8 heritable

Main issue with democracy is that you often end up with the same scenario, only King Chad doesn't rule for 20 years, he rules for 4. And then he gets voted out because King Dumbass promises something better (even if it will never happen) or is just better looking (we should have never given women the vote).

In the short time the good leader has to rule in a democracy, there's not enough time to complete big projects that would result in lasting change. So he has to focus on short-term gains instead, because he knows that anything big and worthwhile he starts will be fucked up by the next person elected into office.

EXACTLY

Irrelevant.

How do we ensure that the best person possible to "inherit power" actually gets into place?
I'd assume (part of) the problem is that there's only one "king" - one "divine ruler" - instead of a group of people who "rule" as a collective?

Then you are sub 100 IQ.

Attached: 227C2B17-4D40-42B0-9FA9-DD8F1A37B7FF.jpg (640x512, 82.48K)

But ALL politicians are clowns, at leat you might get a good monarch

Elaborate.

Attached: democracy explained.jpg (720x498, 35.64K)

the only reason monarchy doesn't work is because Anglo would kill any monarchs it knows of

>DURR MONORKIEZ AR AL DA SAMEZ RITE
There's more than one kind of fascistic system, dipshit.

Attached: Save the west.jpg (767x1024, 133.97K)

>implying monarchies were not incredibly reliant on loans and banking and that issues such a balance of payment crises and royal deficits were not in fact the impetus of many revolutions

I get what you mean;
The Monarch is above all, a Jew and his tricks are nothing for him.
The Nobility (many), while not as "potent" as the Monarch himself (one) aren't as stupid to be tricked, either, since they function as a collective. Even if one of them were to trust the Jew, they'd get outed by the rest.
The Middle Class is interested only in producing things that they like and serving nobility. Can't be used by the Jew in any way except congregating in some dark place and plotting to assassinate the Monarch.
The Lower Class is useless in all ways except being used as fodder for the war / uprising.

It has a chance to work for as long as each "class" recognizes it's own self-worth and seeks out similar people - and in the case when they meet someone "better than them" who is somehow stuck in a lower class, they'll know of a place or two to redirect them - so that the "man with higher potential" can be sent to be schooled by those whom he recognizes by himself.

It still has a chance to fail, and what I described above isn't monarchy at all - but something like the Chinese system (or, uh, Greek democracy? excuse me for being mistaken...).

the President is an elected Monarchy
read a book

democracy is just shadow oligarchy without filia

This but populism.
Biology is more likely to roll the dice better than institution. And you dodge elective propensity

lol

Attached: vooter3.jpg (1286x741, 94.39K)