Should insulting someone be illegal?
Yes. So easily done nowadays.
No, I support absolute freedom of speech. No speech should be censored or punished, except calls of violence against individuals.
>except calls of violence against individuals
why?
Haha you're an idiot and you can't legally insult me back.
Yes. To guarantee freedom of speech you must have the right to say whatever you want and not be condemned for it
FUCK YOU COMMIE
Op where did you get that map? Where can I find more maps of this type?
Thats not absolute freedom of speech then you fuckin fagg
i will come to (You)r town and legally insult (You) on main square
Bump
>I support absolute freedom of speech.
>except calls of violence against individuals.
Wiki
It’s not legal in Italy tho.
Only if the person being insulted is Jewish
No*
I misread the title, what i mean is that to insult would be legal
>that region in Mexico
is this where the spanish live
yes
based best korea
no because they can become sad and that's the worst thing in the world. like seriously, making someone sad should be punished harder than raping or killing them
Okay we'll just use brand names then.
Disney = Groomer
Nike = Nigger
Starbucks = Jews
btw I remember a reddit moment where a steam Jannie was flamed by a russian and blocked him out of his steam acc after that
bitch faggot had to walk back and reopen his acc
because russian law and society is that vulgar
Would you censor child porn?
>look mom, I shit up a conversation with semantic truisms again!
>except calls of violence against individuals
here's the problem - define what a call to violence is
if I criticize the government and call for a protest, is that a call to violence?
if I criticize just the government but imply a protest without saying it explicitly, is that a call to violence?
if I criticize the disproportionate ethnicity that finds itself at the top of the government, and not even the government, is that an attempt to criticize their government and therefor indirectly call for a protest and incite violence?
Do not make laws that have a flexible indeterminate red line. They will always, ALWAYS, be turned against you or against your children 30 years down the line. Ambiguity is the seed of totalitarianism. The Americans avoided totalitarianism specifically due to their explicit constitution, and the more the explicitness was eroded and the rulers were allowed to "interpret" it, the closer they got to tyranny. Soon even being proud of being a white will violate like half of the amendments because that now constitutes a microaggression and CRT teaches us that such microaggressions are an attempt at installing a fascist regime and can be seen as a de facto sedition, and in fact the UK is actively persecuting on this basis RIGHT NOW, from the country that was the freest in Europe as a tradition to the country that is the least free, just because racism became illegal and excluded as a hate crime that upsets the stability of the society and may lead to an incitement to rebel against the status quo.
Klaus Schwab, George Sorps , Fauci etc insult me on a daily basis.
if you call me a nigger then you deserve to be fined or jailed yt cracker