> 1896
> Sigmund Freud is treating (((Emma Eckstein))), from a (((socialist))) family
> She has repressed memories of ritual abuse and mutilation (pic related)
> Freud notices a pattern
> Realizes he knows 18 women like that in total
> Realizes women are saying the exact same things like witches interrogated by the Spanish Inquisition
> Makes a public speech saying that mental illness is a result of sexual abuse in childhood
> He is immediately shunned by everyone, but still thinks he is right
> One year later he recants, says it's all false memories or made up
What are the political implications of this?
Satanic Ritual Abuse was discovered in 1896
Parker Green
Nolan Ross
Have a bump
Dylan Butler
it gets much deeper and darker than that. and a lot further back
Jaxson Bailey
>What are the political implications of this?
Demons in disguise? Obsession? Sealing the lower chakra of their victims on purpose/imitating their trauma? It is supposed to promote obedience which I don't believe, but it triggers sexual deviance.
Cameron Morgan
Do you have a link to your source? That's very interesting.
Most assuredly.
Jacob Hall
Very interesting
Blake Cooper
By the way, you misspelled (((Sigmund Freud)))
John Sullivan
>What are the political implications of this?
i guess "they" invited him to the secret club...
Jose Peterson
Interesting post
Alexander Lewis
>in 1896
lmao this has been known by every society for millenia. Also Sigismund SCHLOMO Freud, a kike, noticed a couple of patterns and was forced to kike back and systematize his foundings in the pseudo-theory known as psychoanalysis, which has tiny bits of real science a whole lot of bullshit
Brandon Morgan
Dunno. From a Freudian perspective, it could be seen as a sort of “subconscious archetype” (my wording); it’s not so much that “satanic abuse” is so widespread as much as a bloody, painful, traumatic sexual fantasy/“memory” somehow become a part of the female psyche that results in mental illness (lesbianism, for example).
Jackson Ward
Isaiah Garcia
Xavier Thomas
> Do you have a link to your source?
theatlantic.com
Here is a short version: upi.com
The really fucked up part is that (((Anna Freud))), his daughter, tried to bury this.
She was in charge publishing Freud's letters, and edited out everything related to (((Emma Eckstein))).
The guy who wrote the article in OP found additional documentation which was in a drawer in Freud's desk.
She sued him to stop publishing this, but he won in court.
This was in 1984, one year after McMartin preschool, interestingly.
> From a Freudian perspective, it could be seen as a sort of “subconscious archetype” (my wording)
No, read the primary documentation or any summary of it.
In 1896 Freud publicly said this was all actual pedophilia and stood by his views for a year.
In 1897 he suddenly started talking about Oedipus complex.
Logan Martinez
>walls of text
>flag
Tl;dr,cba. Why should I care what femoids are doing?
Logan Garcia
The only reason you even know his name is because of his nephew Edward Bernays. During the war (((Freud))) couldn't get any money so Bernays had him published in America and then pushed him hard.
Brandon Hill
Well, you can either believe Anna Freud is part of a satanic cult, or perhaps she was simply embarrassed her father was so engrossed with child molestation.
"The address presented a revolutionary view of mental illness. Its title referred to Freud's new theory that the origin of hysteria lay in early sexual traumas, which he called "infantile sexual scenes" or "sexual intercourse" in childhood. This is what later came to be the seduction theory—namely, the belief that such early experiences were real, not fantasies, and had a damaging and lasting effect on the later lives of the children who suffered them."
Or, perhaps Anna Freud was a lesbian and disliked the implication that her lesbianism was a result of sexual trauma...and wouldn't you know it? I just checked her Wikipedia...yep.
I think you're missing the needle in the haystack; it's not about satanic ritual abuse, it's about early childhood sexual trauma causing mental illnesses like homosexuality.
Connor Bell
Benjamin Brown
Thomas Thompson
(((Freud))) doing mind GAYmes to damage control. It happens all the time.
Matthew White
(((Freud)))
Aaron Ward
>it's not about satanic ritual abuse, it's about early childhood sexual trauma causing mental illnesses like homosexuality.
It's both.
Freud discovered that (1) pedophilia was widespread, and (2) some of the abuse was ritual/satanic in nature.
He never publicly talked about (2), talking about (1) got him ostracized and he had to recant a year later out of fear of losing all income.
Also Freud owned first edition of Traumnovelle, the book Eyes Wide Shut is based on.
It is proudly displayed in his museum in Vienna, pic related.
No idea why they chose this book, he had thousands.
Kayden Fisher
Parker Kelly
/x/files fag and occultist here
Know of several intiatory orders where some rituals deal with blood/semen. Its definitely a thing
Connor Mitchell
Isaiah Morales
Guess who was publishing Freud in the UK?
Alexander Bailey
Jace Long
Bentley Bennett
rare quality post