Why do people forget the “well regulated militia” part of the second amendment?

Why do people forget the “well regulated militia” part of the second amendment?

Attached: Finn54.jpg (833x856, 135.79K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtu.be/42iqg_UFORA
youtu.be/-6Laa2LiS2E?t=3134
morningsteel.com/mint-and-testosterone/
healthyeveryday.co.uk/does-mint-kill-testosterone/
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19585478/
bestfoodfacts.org/is-there-estrogen-in-milk/
livestrong.com/article/554285-does-milk-raise-estrogen-in-men/
dailymedicaldiscoveries.com/milk-and-high-estrogen-levels-what-men-need-to-know/
drcarney.com/blog/health-issues/milk-makes-estrogen-levels-rise
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19496976/
twitter.com/AnonBabble

Built for BBC

the question becomes, "Regulated by who?"

regular and irregular forces do not refer to level of bureaucratic imbroglio they're subjected to

>Why do people forget the “well regulated militia” part of the second amendment?
Those who understand basic english grammer are not confused by it.

And the point in 2022, of guns, is to kill every man woman and child in our ruling class.

The guberment or state, obviously

Attached: f520c94c6c79167cb06e0953054b0a80.jpg (736x736, 140.1K)

source on this biological female?

Why do people confuse a RIGHT with an OBLIGATION?
You have a right to bear arms. Doesn't mean you have to.
It says a well regulated militia is necessary to the security of a free state. Doesn't mean you're obliged to do that part yourself, you know that, right?

same reason they read over and ignore the commas

They don't.