Why are leftists so obsessed with sources for everything?

Why are leftists so obsessed with sources for everything?

Attached: Screen Shot 2022-07-16 at 8.54.25 AM.png (1274x884, 1.29M)

Source?

>Why are leftists so obsessed with sources for everything?

do you have a source to back up that claim?

It's not the source they're looking for. What they need is to have the claim or opinion spelt out directly because inference and critical thinking aren't allowed in their worldview.

yikes, this is misinformation.
Give a source next time.

because it's a great way to attack rightoids.

Attached: 1654650544515.jpg (692x692, 111.02K)

Source?

Appeal to authority.

>Why are leftists so obsessed with sources for everything?
Cause they want to find the source of their autism.

>leftists obsessed with sources
baby's first narrative structure

Attached: you.gif (214x148, 385.14K)

Why do rightoids rely on unsubstantiated claims?

Asking a source is jot wrong per se. It’s a problem when it becomes a pavlovian response to everything that doesn’t fit your programming.

Because it brings credibility to your claims if you can show that you’ve actually done research about the subject you’re discussing instead of just pulling bullshit out of your ass.

Until the rightoid just laughs and then carries on as if you're not there. PS that is called turning the other cheek and it's why they make fun of us. Guess what it makes them seethe.
What then?

you could provide them with a source and they wouldnt bother to read it. its a butch tactic to dismiss your argument without providing one.

If you're ultimately just going to kill anyone who disagrees with you, why bother with a pedigree for any of your opinions? Just murder people.

>accredited
They aren't, they just want to undermine your credibility or trap you into using their own.

Nigger lefties don't have any (((sources))) either

Fpbp

Yea the hylics are going to see what our brains our capable of pretty soon here LOL.
Credibility..
Bro we speak of things that are not as if they were, and of things that are as if they are not.
And then it is so.
Deal with it faggot.
You were first with the Big Brain I Check My Sources and Am Right and now you're about to be last. That is how this works.

Was listening to NPR yesterday (I know, terrible mistake) as they were talking about Steve Bannon testifying at the Jan 6 show trials. The “expert” they were interviewing said something along the lines of “Bannon is ready to testify so he can spread misinformation regarding the events surrounding that day.”

Literally you can have a first-hand source and the left will already label it misinformation if it doesn’t fit the narrative they are selling. I mean they were calling his words “misinformation” preemptively.

So it’s not really about the source per se, it’s just another tool to control the narrative.

so they could laugh at you, discredit or request more sources

They can't think for themselves

Because leftists are typically college educated. College is all about citing your sources, but not because academia is interested in reaching the truth, but because there are literally thousands if not tens of thousands of people employed by colleges who need to justify their employment by churning out some shitty research paper every once in a while. The same thing for the students, in order to earn a masters degree you need to prove that you can operate within the corrupt academic process. This is how you get shitty papers like "diet and exercise have absolutely no connection to weight gain and loss" and then some liberal arts major will take that shitty paper and write "the fatphobic health industry is actually misdiagnosing fatties" and then someone will take that paper and do a ted talk on it and before you know it everyone on tiktok is spouting this bullshit that they got from "research" without actually questioning if the source was valid to begin with.

Since when is providing sources for some of your claims a bad thing anyway?

If the people you refer to as "leftists" suddenly start talking about global happiness and freedom, are you going to argue from a "contrarian" stance just for the sake of it?

They are not
They are obessed with the opinion of (((experts)))

what would they do if Harvard said global warming was real and Yale said global warming wasn't? Would they just say "well I trust Harvard more so global warming is real"? Or would they read the fucking articles before saying their opinion? Obvious answer

range ban poland please jannies
never a good post, never ever

>implies he’s a prophet
>definitely not pulling this out of his ass

Ok

They are not, they ask when they think they have eliminated all diversifying information that can be found

“Unsubstantiated” like men cannot give birth?

This clown world has gotten so far away from basic fact that you have professors testifying in congress that women are men and vice versa, scolding congressmen that say things like “only women can give birth”

Sure, the left could find a source that says “akshually transmen are men and can give birth”, but that doesn’t mean it’s correct.

because they dont ever have any