What’s the difference between feudalism and what we have now?

Functionally on a day to day basis with how most people interact with the world, how is it different? We just have slightly more kings?

Attached: 50B33540-C344-4E4A-833C-6C36A709FBFC.png (650x567, 243.17K)

in the modern way, the king took half of the bottom of the pyramid because fucking peasants can’t even weat.

...

Capitalism is one tiny step to the left of feudalism. It's only a tiny step, though

Their local lord wasn't a rootless jew that wanted to give away his own lands to foreigners.

You could kill a king

The old aryan world order derived its political power from coercion and violence. The current khazarian world order derives its political power from persuasion and deceit.

What’s the functional difference between coercion and persuasion in your eyes? Because it sounds like all you just said was you think previously things were more violent, which is objectively not the case.

The main point, which is paraphrasing De Toqueville, is that now you can't see the social distinction. He used different examples, but think how poverty is visibly concealed by cheap chinese products, that everyone has access to cheap entertainment and so forth. On the other hand you also have the wealth and power of society hidden. A lord or bishop would flash his status like our celebreties do. But the celebreties are a dime a dozen, but the actual powerful people are unknown to most of society.
One could also say that we are not locked in classes, and have the option to go other places. But everywhere we go it's the same set of institutions governing society. Goldman Sachs owns the biggest share of our media in Norway for instance. And when you do go to the other place you still function like a serf.
Lastly, we are living post-enlightenment, so instead of an organic ordering of society with a direct line from your serfdom upwards to the king who is ordained by God himself we are detached from this ordering where men are in their proper station. This exacerbates the nihilist crisis, we lose the social connection upwards to the divine and detach from the social order like hikikomori or incels.

Not to defend him but it objectively was the case

People underestimate how non-violent and ordered life is today compared to literally any period of history. And it 100% comes from market economy not being a zero sum game while before you literally had to harm others to improve your own position

The marxist idea of noble primitive communists is a lie and has been disproven by historical / archeological / anthropological research

Meds now

What are you talking about? There’s homeless encampments all over the streets and the wealthiest people in the world are well publicized. Lmao just nonsense

>The old aryan world order
Feudalism was a coloni system-derived late Roman nonsense, daft kike.

absolutely nothing is stopping you from being your own boss, good luck making your own kingdom as a medieval peasant

Nothing, the only difference is that monarchy's have in built culture and have a real Hierarchy that all humans crave not the weird one we live in now.

1: america is third world tier. 2: this phenomena is mostly in california. 3: you've never had feudalism

Frederick Engels(pbuh) used to say:
The serf possesses and uses an instrument of production, a piece of land, in exchange for which he gives up a part of his product or part of the services of his labor.
The proletarian works with the instruments of production of another, for the account of this other, in exchange for a part of the product.
The serf gives up, the proletarian receives. The serf has an assured existence, the proletarian has not. The serf is outside competition, the proletarian is in it.

>you think previously things were more violent, which is objectively not the case
lmao
that was literally objectively the case, and it's not even close
we're living in the least violent times ever

If you're not a useless lazy neet, you can easily rise up.

you have less property rights, work way more hours, longevity the same if you beat adolescence.

well, there were many different classes. a serf rented the land from the lord.
if you owned your own land then what engels says makes sense. a landowning farmer was pretty high status here and most peasants were locked to their land. shit was harsh. a suprising thing I learned is that Ivan the Terrible of all peple let the serfs move, but with the caveat that they could only do it in winter.
learning about the construction of cathedrals is what convinced me about them having more free time. people volunteered and large portions of european society was mobilized to make something they wont even see finished in their lifetime. imagine what we could do with the technological capabilities we have.

its really eye opening when you see their average work week is like 20-25 hours. the work is much more physical, which is great because that means youre fit. then how much extra wealth even peasants could generate really shows how the modern standard fucked everyone. ever since it was introduced, minimum wage buys you 3 loaves of bread. same now as then, as above so below etc. what have you.