Should young adults be living with their parents or should they move out immediately?
Living with parents
Of course they should be, how else are you supposed to save money
Slovakia confirmed AMERICAN
they should move out when they get married.
I don’t get it, you can see USA on the far left of map being 13.9%. Wait a minute..
This map directly corrolates with faggotry.
North Europe is lost.
Wait if you don’t get married until you’re 30 (becoming more and more common). This map is about 25-34 year olds. What should those people do? Stay at home and take care of parents?
Secondly, what if after you’re married your parents are very elderly.
It’s “White culture”. But god damn Northern Europe and Scandinavia took the “rugged individualism” too far lmfao
I'll move out the second I have enough money to do so. Anyone above 25 living with their parents better have a *great fucking reason* to do so, or else I will automatically categorize them in the same group as lazy welfare-receiving niggers. I don't understand how you can be a fully grown adult man and still happily leech off of your parent's hard work.
t. zoomer in uni
Moving out imeduatly traps you in a spiral of shity jobs needed just to pay off rent.
Low IQ child who does not care about familial success and generational wealth
Based Pole who has family values
>43%
holy fuck there's no way that's true
I'd kill myself if I had to keep living with my family
I have no debt
>Yes live like filthy brownoid Indians it's hecking based to live with your parent's at 34
You DO realize you can support your family without actively living in their house, right? Or is this all just a cope for you to justify still living with your parent's despite being well into your 30's?
le 43% meme
Yes, yes, good goy :)
Give me your rent money silly goy. Don't save up for a downpayment.... very good little goy. You will own nothing and be happy.
what sense does it make to leave early? So you can waste tons of money to rent? No thank you. Saved up cash till I got married at 26, both me and wife's parents helped us economically to buy our flat and we have a kid on the way. Our families live walking distance from us. Half the baby stuff we have is passed by our siblings, who had kids before us. My parents took care of their parents in their last years and we will do the same. Without a strong family network you will go insane and penniless
i think slovakia is this high beacuse its a small nation with tons of gypsies, so its better to live with your parents in a white neighborhood than move somewhre else and live with gypsies or hungaryans
>t. doesn't know anything about buying houses
Ok, go ahead and buy a house with 20x leverage and wait for a recession, dumbass.
I will foreclose on you and ruin you little goy
Depending of the region. In overcrowded cities with rent higher than the average salary - yes, it's ok to live with parents until you reach some financial stability. In rural regions - children should look for a separate home.
Get a grip.
Depends whether your parents are scum or not, and whether they own a large house or you're taking up space in their little flat.
>living with your parents is leeching off them
I guess we found the reason Swedes are antisocial, even your parents don't show you any affection.
It correlates only with salaries and southern european mentality. That is all there is to this.
>living with your parents under one roof is le bad
Its a kike propaganda, you should be living in huge mansions with your family. Every single member of a family works for it and bang, you live like kings.
But that’s the thing, anti social is better than over socialization and extroversion. Anti social is more masculine, stronger sense of self reliance and personal responsibility.
Anti social societies
>high social trust
>introverted, mind own business
>innovative
>wealthy
>Japan, South Korea, Nordic
>less crime
Meanwhile on the other end, overly social
>Africa/Black America
>Middle east
>Latin America
>too much crime
>feminine
But that’s besides the point
NOOO this is antisemetic!!! You must give me your rent money little goy!!! You WILL live in a studio by yourself and wage slave!!! You are a loser incel if you do not!!!
Unironic whitepill that you had loving parents, and that you got married at 26. Both rare in America kek. But what if you’re in 26-30 range and still not married.
But more importantly, what if your parents are very elderly (60s-70s), should you stay and take care of them? Would that take priority? Also if and when they die you could just inherit the house instead of debt. That’s the counter argument I guess.
There is literally nothing wrong with living with your parents if you contribute to the family. Throughout most of history families have lived together through generations. I think moving out is ideal as it helps you grow up more, but I don't think the whole "lol your a loser since you didn't move out in to a pod when you were 18" stigma is a good thing.
I'm 28, I have low 6 figures cash and I choose to live at home and support my elderly grandmother and my poor mother rather than move out. I pay the council tax and utilities and do the grocery shopping while my mother works. I genuinely like living with my family, I have no desire to start a family and I don't think the expense of moving out is worth the cost.
I lived alone from 17 years old to 25 so you can't call me stunted or a loser or whatever. And I have plenty of savings so I don't feel trapped. I go on 5 holidays a year and barely work, just when I feel like it I will take a contract.
When the housing market collapses, which it will, I may well consider buying a house. Until then I feel under absolutely zero pressure to move out by comformist social media addicted little zoomers like you.
Depends on lot's of factors like culture, house-type and Rurality an a country is and so on.
Here in Sweden you are expected to move out. Compare that to let's say Italy you might even have married couples living at a family home handed down through generations.
Same think as people who don't live with their parents? I don't get the question.
Can confirm for over here, when my sister married her husband was still living with his parents, as well as his brother, both over 30 then, though I'm not sure how much. For some years they lived 2 grandparents, my sister, her husband and their child, the brother + a dog. They moved out after getting a loan and moving into their own apartment. The brother might still be living with the parents, and he is at least late 30s by now.
The only people I know that don't live with their parents in this age range are people that came to a big city from a smaller one.village, or the lucky ones who managed to inherit an apartment after a grandparent died or their parent bought one for them. Everyone else is living with their parents.
It's just foolish throwing all that money you would spend on rent to the wind.
What you're comparing is basically
>Materialism
Vs
>SOVL
How many people would willingly live in a society that is anti-social? Where you don't know your neighbor and don't form a community? Life in perpetual, self-inflicted isolation. Don't think I'm advocating for the complete flipping on things, I agree with you that oversocializated people have issues as well.
Another counter argument, pressuring kids to leave the house and support themselves, even if apartment/studio, will give more incentive to work hard and solitude would help with creativity, thus a more dynamic economy. Compare the cultures where kids move out early (Scandnavia, America) to those that don’t . Much more innovation and creativity in the former.
This. I can still tell my boss to fuck off. Already did like 3 career switches
>lol your a loser since you didn't move out in to a pod when you were 18" stigma is a good thing.
Where does this come from? Is this uniquely American or North Europe as well.