Is nuclear the future? And why is it so vehemently opposed?

Is nuclear the future? And why is it so vehemently opposed?

Attached: nuclear.png (554x89, 8.6K)

It puts economic power in uranium producers, which are firmly under Russian/French/CCP/US control
I'd create a new paradigm

I read "nuclear war" instead of "nuclear" kek

Attached: nuke.png (1097x820, 860.63K)

>Is nuclear the future?
Yes, at least until we can set up helium-3 mining on the moon.
>And why is it so vehemently opposed?
Cause anti-nuclear retard still think we're in the 80s

The west no longer has a labor base competent enough to maintain a nuclear energy grid

>tfw the elite are afraid of another Napoleon after all these years

Attached: 1595411682939.png (1024x1024, 90.99K)

because theyre gay.
yes nuclear is the future, especially forgetting climate change and all that its a more efficient and powerful source of energy. anyone opposing nuclear is a shill

no it is because nuclear power would emancipate the people
and that will not happen
the great reset will happen, and enslavement will be set in place via digital methods
and only then will nuclear come

It is opposed because they wouldn't have an excuse to limit our population and lower our standard of living if we had a clean energy source that works as good as fossil fuels. They are enemies of humankind.

Its expensive to build, and scares people. The few accidents have been enormously expensive and harmful. The fuel is extreme rare to the point that only a few places in the Earth have it. Refining the material is toxic. Disposing of the waste is extremely difficult. Decommissioning old plants is labor intensive.

OR

You could just build a gas plant and it pays for itself in two years.