Reading some pretty old books currently and I can say that at least until the 17th century, big tits were seen as ugly, and apt to develop cancer. However, it was pretty complicated to make them smaller, so much in fact that the usual recommendation to big tit chicks was like this >Leave them as they are as long as there aren't any problems, because believe it or not, there are some men who like big tits, so you will find a husband probably anyway which is obviously ludicrous from a modern view.
But it got me thinking. If big tits were seen as unattractive so much and for so long, who made them acceptable and when? And why?
Didn't go much further than the 17th century rn, but maybe someone knows the answer. I know the collective IQ here has shrunk in the last few years but hey, tits, someone's gotta know.
>which is obviously ludicrous from a modern view Maybe in your consooming zoomie modern view
Jaxon Lewis
Unattractive according to who? Thick woman were always for breeding and thin women were socialites. A facade of fake interests. Hollywood gave the impression that thin women was the perfect figure but, in reality they're mostly infertile, especially fit women.
John Rivera
From a utilitarian and evolutionary pov, hourglass body is ideal
big boobs with masculine hips and flat ass is peak disgusting.
Ryan Johnson
Why aren't flat tits insults mainstream?
Luke Wilson
>Unattractive according to who? Thick woman were always for breeding and thin women were socialites. A facade of fake interests. Hollywood gave the impression that thin women was the perfect figure but, in reality they're mostly infertile, especially fit women. In the books I read, both small and big tits are described as unattractive and moderate, well-formed was described as the best, in fact, the only acceptable thing from a medical point of view. Big titties were seen as lacking in milk production usually, just like very small ones.
Big tits in women = too much heat in the body. Man tits = too much wetness/phlegm in the body.
Jeremiah Perry
That body type is also described in the old books, btw, and also seen as not healthy.
Luis Russell
Low testosterone post
Nicholas Rivera
because witches rule over you.
Connor Reyes
Ancient Romans didn't like big fat tats either though.
They are, or at least they were. I have a Gen X relative who's flat chested unfortunate nickname in high-school became "the great plains" This was class of 89 or 90 iirc
Nathaniel Garcia
Yeah? I also read books from the 15th century talking about cancer, which they said was due to a melancholic temperament (black bile).
Austin Flores
Romans were also faggots, so...
Evan Gomez
And? Who gives a shit if they were the bees knees theyd still be around
Thomas Davis
I find flabby big tits disgusting desu. But the brain can be rewired to find almost anything sexually stimulating. This is why more dudes watching porn get roped into further kink, until one day they are into ass play and cock sucking.
