youtube.com/watch?v=RAr26sxcVAc Tidal Lagoon Energy Generation - ZERO emissions - A limitless and regular resource (day and night) - Can be built on any shoreline on the planet - Power output is nearly comparable to a nuclear power plant (depending upon size).
Why isn't it more common? ...because it's free-energy, and powerful people across the world would lose control. - Wind and solar generation would be practically nullified. - The Middle-East would collapse by rendering fossil fuels nearly irrelevant. - WEF's narrative falls apart. - Green faggots would go back into the closet.
>Concrete is the most widely used man-made material in existence. It is second only to water as the most-consumed resource on the planet. >But, while cement - the key ingredient in concrete - has shaped much of our built environment, it also has a massive carbon footprint. >Cement is the source of about 8% of the world's carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions, according to think tank Chatham House. Sorry chud, but you can't have concrete.
Carter Brown
It will destroy and fragment the Tidal ecosystem, and alter erosion patterns
Nicholas Barnes
This. Retards will kill half of the ocean life for a retarded discount-dam.
Gabriel Morgan
Then die.
Luis Lewis
and that's a good thing
David Ross
i bet this will slow down the moon's orbit and cause it to crash into us therefore I am all for it
Ian Roberts
No, and you're retarded.
Joseph Morris
The moon will fall out of the sky if we harvest too much of its energy
Samuel Jackson
Small price to pay.
Christopher Nelson
How does it do with the salt? Also speaking of salt why not just build assembly line made molten salt reactors and use up all the spent nuclear waste as fuel?
Eli Diaz
>molten salt reactors Because they dont work
Wyatt Reyes
Same as anything else in the ocean. It would require regular cleaning/maintenance.
Easton Green
It would wouldn't it. But it would happen slowly over time. By the time it actually hit the earth, it hit tangentially and roll like a massive ball.
Are you from a planet where tidal erosion is considered a good thing? Here on Earth, it's pretty much always considered a negative.
Nathan Wilson
>Why isn't this extremely beneficial thing that can topple the financial world order being DONE, guys? Do you even listen to yourself? Herbs, herbs, herbs, herbs, herbs...
Dylan Smith
The moon is already moving further out into space. Maybe we'd just counterbalance it to stop.
In a long enough time-line, maybe we could get the moon closer, and then the tidal energy would work even better!
Julian Walker
>attempts to prevent tidal erosion by creating a low-oxygen tension algal lake on the coast that kills coastal wildlife >builds wall to prevent sand deposition during coastal storms what could go wrong?
Carter Allen
Did you even read the entire OP?
No, faggot, no you did not.
Jack Gutierrez
I don't f*****g care, care, care, care...
Liam Miller
They can use roman cement, which absorbs carbon dioxide. Or a similar formula
Hunter Kelly
And wind turbines slaughter birds and insects, damaging the balance of the ecosystem that depends on them. They're also chopping down massive amounts of forests for this shitty unreliable green energy. Better to build a giant coastal dam. At least that would be steady flow of energy and if done right, there would still be a rising and falling tide within the enclosure. Only difference is the water passes through turbines instead of flowing freely.
Hunter Gomez
this has already been tried in california before kikes shut it down. they ruled that it harms the ability of tiny fish to live in the area
Bentley Wood
>attempts to prevent tidal erosion by creating a low-oxygen tension algal lake on the coast that kills coastal wildlife None of that is true. >builds wall to prevent sand deposition during coastal storms No one gives a fuck. Are you always this big of a faggot?
Noah Robinson
You cared enough to care four times, and then to self censor for some reason.
You care too much.
Austin Wilson
This is the second thread to tonight sfere someone seems to have googled the most retarded unworkable ideas to generate renewable power Actually 3rd I think
Jeremiah Wright
There are many implementations of tidal power, some are similar to microhydropower (without water dams), others to regular hydropower (such as this one).
Aiden Watson
Bitch.
Michael Kelly
All concrete absorbs CO2. But much more is generated during its production. This is even if you use solar power to heat the kiln, the chemical reaction of making cement itself releases CO2
Nathaniel Butler
You could reduce the rotation of the turbines by making them higher torque on the generator, and include large gates covering the intake.
There are also paddle systems that can be used instead of turbines which is safer for marine life, but less efficient.
CO2 is a scam. They just hype it so they can tax it. When CO2 levels rise, plant life thrives and balances it out again.
David Rivera
By that logic, doing nothing is the only green method that would satisfy the climate fags.
How about we just depopulate the world instead? How much CO2 does a rotting corpse give off?
Tyler Robinson
How much of the fucking shore do you think needs be covered for this to work? >ma lagoons Build artificial lagoons. OP is right.
James Diaz
I know.
Parker Taylor
>By that logic, doing nothing is the only green method that would satisfy the climate fags. Yes
Samuel Nelson
Accurate.
Water vapor accounts for nearly all of the green house gasses, and is the true driver of the climate. CO2 is a trace gas, and only a very small portion comes from humans.
Firstly, global wyrding, or whatever they call it these days, is bullshit. Secondly, shit like this is going to be fucking destroyed by salt and barnacles before it ever pays for itself. You can tell because every time they've tried this it has been abandoned because it's obviously a stupid fucking idea. Thirdly, fuck jannies.
