Hello. I want to give the opportunity for ***(?)tists to have a healthy discussion here. The reason I am doing that is that I think that good discussion can be generated from that. The reason is that we tend to improve our knowledge and arguments by being exposed to diverse and contrary opinions, so I think that people can mutually benefit themselves by having a healthy exchange of ideas. Another reason is that divisiveness among people appears to be a problem on the internet. We are living in a period in which the elites (you can call it "ruling classes" or "powerful people") are purposefully screwing people's lives. The reason to presume that is the fact that the political and economical situation of the world appears to be progressively getting worse when there are enough resources to supply everyone's needs in the world, which signals that the elites act in a bad faith and have hideous interests because all that is necessary to enhance the current economical situation is good faith from the part of the elites.
I think the division of society does the devil's bidding in facilitating the elites to screw people. I suppose that everyone, from the so-called right-wing and left-wing, would agree that the current politicians suck and that the will of the masses has to be served in politics, so I think that a union between the so-called right-wing and left-wing can be useful for them to fight this problem. Politics just appears to be a theater and politicians manage to sow division among people at the expense of their caprices and extravagancies.
Unplugging Matrix - Seeking to stop divisiveness
Take as an example the 2016 elections: it was highly "politicized" and people got divided because of politicians while these politicians were relishing comfortable and high-standard lives. These politicians did a relatively small physical and mental exertion during the election period and yet the small exertion they did was capable of causing divisiveness among a lot of people, which caused more discomfort to people than the discomfort their small exertion may have caused them. People fighting with each other just serve for people to stray their focus from politicians. People should unite themselves to pressure politicians into making their lives better and eventually making their lives as politicians so stern by the demands people make to them that they would have no incentives to be politicians just for the sake of sucking taxpayer money and enslaving people. Fighting with each other by pressuring each other expecting that the situation will get better by doing that will just generate more division in society and that will facilitate even more the endeavor of the elites to screw people.
Ideologies represent tribes, and people search for tribes to feel secure. With the right and left notion, people began associating ideas to a specific side, which represents a tribe, so they equated accepting certain ideas with putting themselves at risk, so people tended to avoid considering the ideas they considered to belong to the side that they do not belong to. When someone expressed an idea, people immediately attempted to attribute a side to the idea so that then they may decide whether they will agree with the idea or not and attempted to attribute a side to the person who professed the idea, as if when someone expressed one idea, people automatically attributed one side to one idea and assumed that the person belonged to a specific side, as if a simple idea was capable of triggering a chain of information in people's memories representing ideas, as if one idea on the memory of people led to another idea in memory, which led to another idea in memory, which led to another idea in memory, and so on and so forth, as if they were incapable of dissociating one idea from another and incapable of dissociating one idea from a side, as if they were incapable of thinking about ideas without referencing themselves to a right-left visual-spatial doltish conceptual framework, so people began to have a thinking that works in chunks of information (or blocks) and pavlovian trigger responses, therefore people developed a tendency to be incapable of thinking through subtleties and a tendency to make generalizations.
Generalizations represent setting margins for oneself to keep oneself safe, because when one makes generalizations one becomes less open to new experiences, less risk-taking, and has more criteria for accepting experiences in order to avoid risk, and, in some sense, it also represents the act of adjoining ideologies, which represents tribes, because an ideology is a set of ideas, and a person prefers choosing a set of ideas rather than simply choosing ideas that are separate from any belief systems and ideologies in order to feel oneself secure. A feature that was noticeable about the people from the so-called right-wing and left-wing is that it was genuinely difficult for them to establish a healthy exchange of ideas between each other because if people didn't speak quite a specific parlance and exhibit a quite specific set of ideas, then one side would likely not be open to the other side. What would happen is that a side would face the other side as being a threat to the safety of the side, and that happens because of the generalizations caused by the trigger responses and the relationship that ideologies have to tribalism. It is noteworthy to mention that the right-left notion refers to a visual-spatial notion and that it is reasonable to suppose that, because the right-left notion alludes to a visual-spatial notion, each side represents a territory of a tribe (right/left), and that the visual-spatial notion of right and left could also be up and down or forward and backward (disregarding, for instance, any "deeper meanings" that the left and right sides may represent).
Buzzwords such as "racist", "homophobic", "transphobic", etc, along with ideologies, served as pavlovian triggers to associate certain ideas with buzzwords, which, in turn, were associated with the right side. This impeded furthermore the chances of healthy discussions being established between the sides. These buzzwords are nothing but terms that invoke the underlying threat of the state escalating things against people in such a way that it may be prone to make use of physical force against people, because the state tends to persecute people for the fact they have these terms attributed to them, for example, through "hate speech" laws and groups such as Anonymous, Antifa, and BLM, that work like government proxy militias to threaten, intimidate, and harass people. The left side appears to think with emotions, so to speak, emotions appear to be related to relationships of power, and leftists appear to orient themselves according to the relationships of power by following the status quo, so the idea of leftists having the buzzwords "racist", "homophobic", "transphobic", etc, attached to them was equated to a threat to them, so that impeded the chances of healthy discussions to be established between the sides. With time, the range of possibilities of what could be expected to be defined by buzzword terms such as "racist", "homophobic", "transphobic", etc, increased to the extent that speaking the truth would fit in these terms and basically everything could fit in these terms. For instance, with enough verbal skills and "mental gymnastics", one can come up with a theory that states renting a house is "homophobic", that math is "racist", and that eating meat is "White Supremacy".
These terms were used in so many different instances that people developed an intuitive notion that what these terms are supposed to mean is the spirit of what the status quo wants, so for them to "know" what these terms mean on an occasion they would, in effect, have to (sort of) telepathically (this word is being used for figure of language comical effect sake) "enter in the head" of the person that uses these terms, in a sort of psychotic/schizophrenic depersonalization exercise, so that then they may know what is the meaning of these terms, that, in turn, "only exists on the head" of the person that used them. That means that buzzwords became terms that entities that represent the status quo can use to do what they want with them and what matters is not the definition or meaning behind these terms (alas, these terms lack definition and meaning) but the spirit behind these words. For instance, let's take as an example the buzzword terms "misinformation", "fake news", and "hate speech". The fact something is called "misinformation" or "fake news" doesn't make something to become automatically false, but these buzzword terms are used to convey that notion. In relation to the term "hate speech", it is impossible to know what emotions one was experiencing while conveying information, nor the intentions a person had while conveying information. Information is not emotions, and facts don't care about emotions, however, the term "hate speech" is used to convey a notion that assumes otherwise. Some people just appear to experience the emotion of hate when they read some information, then they project their emotion of hate to the person that wrote the information assuming it is the person that experiences hate or the information itself is hateful (as if information can be "hateful") (it appears to be relatively common among certain types of psychotic individuals to project one's mental state into reality and confuse one's mental state with reality).
It is a technique from narcissists to contradict themselves so that people may realize that what matters is not what they say but what they want so that people may comply with them, and a thing with a similar effect was done with buzzwords by these buzzwords being used in situations that are so varied that people realized that the rationalizing factor behind these terms is the spirit behind these terms, that is the will of the people that use these terms, therefore "racism" means "what one defines "racism" to be", "what one "feels" "racism" to be", "everything one dislikes" (due the fact there is a negative emotional charge attached to this buzzword term); "homophobia" means "what one defines "homophobia" to be", "what one "feels" "homophobia" to be", "everything one dislikes" (due the fact there is a negative emotional charge attached to the this buzzword term); "transphobic" means "what one defines "transphobic" to be", "what one "feels" "transphobia" to be", "everything one dislikes" (due the fact there is a negative emotional charge attached to this buzzword term), etc... May thee weaponize these terms to mean "what you mean "racism" to be" instead of "what other people mean "racism" to be", "what you mean "homophobia" to be" instead of "what other people mean "homophobia" to be", "what you mean "transphobia" to be" instead of "what other people mean "transphobia" to be". If what matters is the will behind the terms and the intents behind the terms, then use the terms according to thy will and according to thy favor, and not according to other people's will and other people's favor.
So, basically, ideology was weaponized to divide and conquer society along with pavlovian trigger words and buzzword terms, and there was probably a certain government that was used to invade countries that helped that. A certain government can simply run psychological operations/information operations on social media by steering them the way they want and by creating fake accounts on them. There are social media in specific that became a psychosis/schizophrenia-inducing nest full of sensory overload, dissonant bits of information, and nonsense shenanigans. Some other social media appear to censor content from the right side and appear to be controlled by a certain government. That serves to give thee a notion that governments are capable to control social media and what we are experiencing now is that all major social media are considerably influenced by a certain government, so there are no genuine places for genuine discussions to happen, places in which people from different political spectrums, ideas, and cultural backgrounds may be capable of having healthy discussions (plus + without agents from a certain government attempting to disrupt the discussions). This is a problem to be solved.
The elites, government agents from certain governments, and glowies do not want people to unite; they want divisiveness. They seek to separate one community from another and detract one community to another community. For example, in Any Forums, shills carp is about people using double spacing in their writing (they call it "Reddit Spacing"). The fact Reddit uses double spacing doesn't make double spacing to be a bad thing, but shills presume that way so that you may make a pavlovian association between stuff (Reddit = Double Spacing; Reddit = Bad; therefore Double Spacing = Bad (thee hast to know how to separate information well). It is a petty carping. The shills also have the phrase "Go back to >>Reddit" and "Go back to chan". It appears to be a sort of subtle NLP threat. That's because going back is a spatial awareness predicate that refers to the notion of retreating, and one retreat when one is in fear". Notice it is not "Go to >>Reddit", "Go forward to >>Reddit", or "Go upward to Reddit", but "Go back to >>Reddit". There is also the ">" symbol which means "inferior to", in which one could suppose it means a corner (maybe), which would signify that the phrase suggests the person retreat into a corner being cornered. Reddit appears to be full of open-minded and intelligent individuals, but it is censored and some members appear to be mentally deranged, however, I don't think it is the right thing to do to shut yourself from the possibility of having contact with Reddit users and saving them from their trauma-based mind control and mental derangedness. Some of them are mentally problematic individuals who need psychological support, and you can represent the rescuer figure to them that will give psychological support to them, save them from their trauma-based mind control conditioning, and red pill them.
Now we arrive at the matrix: The matrix of the right-left is that the left side is trauma-based mind control slaves that are programmed to be a shadow of the right side and the right side manages to enforce their trauma-based mind control programming by ideologically gainstanding the left side. The reason why is that the left side is trained to be hysterical/histrionic individuals who put the blame for their problems on the right side and tend to work based on ideology and buzzwords. Whenever the right side does something that may trigger a buzzword in the left side, the left side has its programming enforced. The right side then experiences the fact that the left side turns itself even more against it while not realizing it is simply its shadow, so as a response the right side seeks to adopt even more vehement actions that will furthermore enforce the programming in the left side, so that tends to fuel an infinite feedback loop matrix cycle. The programming of the left is done by the puppeteers of the matrix, the elites, who use trauma, strawmen, divisiveness, and buzzwords to run the matrix show. Breaking the matrix involves breaking trauma, strawman narratives, divisiveness, and buzzwords. Here are some tips I have for thee to break the matrix:
1- Make people feel secure. Make people realize that they are in a computer-generated simulation (internet) that is a virtual reality and as such, the person shall not fear interactions with people and strongly react with emotions in this environment as they are safe there and this environment is not real-life
2- Abolish the concepts of left and right or at least stop seeking to use them. If language creates divisiveness, then changing language will solve the divisiveness
3- Abolish leftist identitarianism. People deserve rights because they are humans, and not because they have a specific characteristic.
4- Speak on behalf of ideas and not ideologies
5- Don't use buzzwords nor curse people if they have ideas different than thee
6- Act as if you are left-sided while being right-sided to convey the notion that the left side has the same opinions as you
7- Seek to be educated towards people from the other side
8- Instead of saying "Blacks", "Gays", "Whites", say "People that are Black", "People that are Gay", "People that are White", so that people may realize that all these people are people and not ontologically different entities (apparently, schizophrenics have difficulties comprehending figures of language, so that appears to be schizophrenic-inclusive)
9- Use the BLM, Antifa, or LGBT flag on Any Forums even though you may not be BLM, Antifa, and or LGBT. That way you give opinions as if you are BLM, Antifa, and or LGBT, and create a sense of "diversity" in the community
10- Stop cursing people
11- Talk about ideas, not people
12- Make sure the person you speak with is capable of dissociating your ideas from other ideas (e.g if you say something, a person may assume you think another thing, through pavlovian triggers; thee hast to separate these triggers from each other)
13- Be open to debate with people with different opinions
14- Call out people with different opinions to come to thy community and debate with people
15- Do not shut thyself from the opportunity of visiting different communities for the most deranged their members may be
16- Pass a notion that it is the government that creates strawmen e.g ("White Supremacy terrorism", "Incel threat") to divide people
That way you will not be fueling people's hysterical/histrionic freak shows!
bump
You are no "alpha male", you are a retard and a shill.
Leftism is real, there is an specific trend of historical ideas developed through Hegelian dialectic that can be clearly defined, whose thinkers can clearly be identified, and whose policies and strategies are in effect in the modern world as these ideas are the ones of the current ruling class.
Leftists are hedonistic, they want to transmute humans into cattle, they are against the institution of family, they are against the successful, they hate everything that is good. There is no exchange of ideas to be made, you can read their "intellectuals" if you care that much about what these pedophiles have to say, and you can conclude as much.
Your stance is disingenuous and ill intended, if one where to adopt the mental castrations you propose the left would win, as they are the ones that hold power inside the global institutions, regardless of you explaining your ideas to a couple of fags.
This is not a struggle of "ideas", at best it is a struggle of transcendental metaphysics, and the war that decides who comes out on top is to be decided with guns, not with feminine tolerance.
Uniting leftists and rightists would still be good because it would generate a discussion between them, and there you can see who would win. I am not saying pretending to castrate people.
Blessed whitepill AI
You don't need to "unite" the left or the right for there to be political discussions. There are already political discussions in the modern world.
More often than not these irrelevant political discussions always end up in fallacious non sequiturs and appeals to authority, not because some "trauma" or some bullshit, but because even in good faith, the very foundations of both philosophies differ ontologically.
Your are pretending to castrate people, in a metaphorical sense, because you are advocating for passivity, as some side of the dialectic "winning" a debate is irrelevant in regards to the necessary requirements for there to be a change of regime.
For there to be a change of regime, a movement needs power and status, and this power can come regardless of whenever you hold a position with philosophical consistency. What bothers me the most is that if you were a little bit aware of the truth around, you would realize the left is hegemonic, and the right wing is not.
I've read everything you've said and I, well I agree with it. The ideas you've laid out to me user are astonishing honestly, after every post I couldn't help myself but go, "holy shit what the fuck".
By his logic calling him "white pilled" would just be another form of divisionism, and what I can gather from his post the more division the worse things become.
midwit coomer
You ever notice how there are no longer any debate shows on mainstream media channels? It's just pandering to established audiences now.
You're further dividing.