The democracy system is like choosing your spouse by your free will...

The democracy system is like choosing your spouse by your free will. The authoritarianism system is like choosing your spouse by arranged marriage.

But both marriage systems have tremendous failure rate. The divorce rate in the US is like 50%. And if you add the failed relationship rate to the sum, the divorce rate could be much higher. Which means most people will choose a wrong person, either for marriage or for political reasons, by free will.

But the arranged marriage system also sucks. India has a very low divorce rate (less than 1%) but most women and men in India cheat. Which also means arranged marriage will very likely to give people incompatible spouses, just like the authoritarianism system will very likely give people bad leaders.

So in short, both systems suck. But which is the lesser evil? Would you prefer free-will love and democracy, or arranged marriage and authoritarianism?

Attached: indiawoman.png (832x790, 1.06M)

Marriages fail because divorce laws.

Democracy and authoritarianism would not work if in both you have the right to decide not following the law anymore

shameless bump for serious discussions.

>arranged marriage and authoritarianism
This. Sounds great.

marriages fail because 2 people dont love each.

Is it true India has BWC breeding parties?

Attached: 1632511279046.jpg (655x527, 59.37K)

AI can do perfect matching if you’re willing to handover all the data

Arranged marriage is and always have been retarded. A reason the monarchy fell. Can't be happy married to someone you don't love. Imagine a king married to his waifu. He would be unstoppable.

In nature, women mate with the strongest male at the time, and when relative strength changes (their mate loses a dominance challenge), women will immediately drop loyalty to their mate and chameleon to the new one until his fortunes change.

In civilization, the economic and physical reality of household life and the need to have two parents for childrearing and work forced a compromise between the natural mating strategies of males and females. The problem is that the basic, natural instincts described above never went away: they were simply suppressed. Kikes knew this, while most well-intentioned people just accept that marriage is natural. So when kikes removed all the social systems (fault-based divorce, adultery laws, domestic violence, husband's right to sex, etc) that supported the marriage compromise, many well-meaning people were blindsided by unexpected exposure to the animal nature underlying mating.

Now we're back to the old system: adapt or die. Anyone marrying under Marriage 2.0 (male slavery) is a retard and will get what they deserve.

It's fucking real bros

Attached: 1642561102197.jpg (1024x685, 50.98K)