Myers Briggs Thread

INTJ

NT=Introspection, and critical thinking--Basically the requirements for independet thought.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jungian_cognitive_functions

I never trust self-reported personality test because we just have a strong bias to answer how we want to be. I would never trust another person to assess my personality because nobody really knows me that much and they also have biases.
I am INTP.

S instead of N for sure means that you are an NPC. Feeling probably just means you are slightly retarded.

Attached: e94ee147324fa628b3c882704a01cc3d.jpg (736x1034, 108.95K)

it's a horoscope for redditors

I have always had a feeling that pretty much everyone here is INTJ/ISTJ and that's precisely the reason why we are drawn to places like this, and why we have such disdain for normies.

Kill ur self faggot

What the others say. NT basically means you're not an automaton spoon fed by others

I would imagine pretty much everyone here is INTP/J
I think it's legit to a degree, although the results you get are always flattering... Why can't at least some of the types be shitty? Lol

No idea. Swear I change every time I take the quiz. Always an IN though.

>astrology with more steps.
Bingo

Attached: 1657195276740.jpg (420x443, 32.68K)

Some websites work that way, sure, but I think Jung was on to something with archetypes. MB is basically a follow-up on that idea.

Some sites will list negative attributes, like this one
16personalities.com/intj-personality

S means they are very unlikely to do any reflection on their lives or anything they take into their mind.
The literal example they give in 16 personalities is that they only care and think about whats in front of them and relevent.
Also keep in mind that S types are able to do it, its just exhausting and pointless to them.

Same here.

being an xNTx essentially means that you are capable of thought, people on the Ti/Ne axis tend to come to conclusions by themselves by noticing patterns (INTP/ENTP) and people on the Te/Ni axis tend to come to conclusions based off of hard evidence and compiling information into a singular conclusion (ENTJ/INTJ), all four types are valuable however some lend themselves better to different tasks, for instance I'd say INTJs are more scientifically inclined whereas ENTJs are more efficiency inclined, ENTPs are literal idea generators and INTPs are essentially just weaponized autism if utilized correctly. Leadership potential primarily falls upon the enneagram/instinctual variants, socionics and the four temperaments in my opinion though.

0U812 here. I don’t understand this thread and I don’t belong here

16personalities is just bootleg big 5, learn cognitive functions

Corporate horoscopes

I may be a schizoid

Attached: file.png (1318x984, 113.61K)

ISTP-brother!

Very true. I only trust people's self reading when they test IP. Those are the types that always seek to know about themselves more.

Used to not believe this until I was in a college class that forced everyone to take the 16 personalities test.
Almost everyone in my class who took this test end up being an INFJ. Obvious false reading as they are suppose to be rare.

A college class is a self-selecting group. I would wager it was probably something STEM or related and heavily male dominated? That would make sense in that case.

I second

The overall root theory is still the same.
16 personalities is based on Myers-Briggs which was based on Carl Jung's big 5 personality traits theory.

It was developed by two women. No man. It’s gender neutral and doesn’t account for alpha vs. beta, stable vs. neurotic (some modern systems try). It’s popular among globohomo office managers. Need I say more.

ISTP-bruder!

I guess INTJ, but they all seem like cope. They fail to list “bad” attributes- judgmental, quick tempered, ability to cut ties easily, indecisive, etc

It was a personal development class. Masdive waste of time. Learned more from self studying online and Any Forums.

b-b-b-b-b--b--b-b--b-b-b-b---b-based ISTP chads

I thought I was the only one around

A psychology class with about an even amount of men and women.

Maybe you just went to a special college for autists, sir

yes however that is like comparing MBTI to socionics, while their origin may be the same and they may be similar in some regards the theories themselves are not. the big 5 is based on 5 different personality factors whereas MBTI is based on cognitive functions.

INFJ here
several year back i took the test multiple times over the period of a year and all of them came back to be INFJ. a few years after that it came out to be something else (maybe INTP i don't remember) but i don't believe I'm anything else other than INFJ now. the description applies quite a bit to me.

This shit is fucking horoscopes for men

Its a community college.
I honestly regret enrolling here. I looked at CS courses in other colleges and my college doesn't teach anything they have. Just simple programming courses that you can find online.

If you took the "test" congrats, you know your idealized typing. Who you wish to be, or feel you are inside. Your mother, your best buddy, your co-workers, will all type you differently if asked to answer that question set.
Your next step could be to study the exact opposite type and see how that reflection looks on yourself. Might be close to your type, might be all wrong. The office testing and 16p.com garbage is very surface level. Going deeper can be dangerous but also very fun.
Welcome to a new hell.
t. ENTP probably

The Personality Assessment Test is better in that sense. Some personalities have very few downsides, and others are described as the absolute scum of the earth.

pasf.org

It works by combining 3 categories that can take 4 values each, so 64 personalities total. Each of them is described in detail in a PDF in that website.

the lines between certain types are are blurred, but why not, it does describe personalities pretty well.
same, brah. It sucks ass