Ban me please mods. I know it's useless when I come here and try to speak sense to people. I come here too often...

Ban me please mods. I know it's useless when I come here and try to speak sense to people. I come here too often. In the end, I spend too much time here. Just ban me, please

Attached: wealth inequality.png (996x790, 415.14K)

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monetary_reform_in_the_Soviet_Union,_1922–24
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

Attached: 1657612485755.png (1920x1080, 1.53M)

Bourgeois, subsequently known as muddle class.

Bourgeois means the rich, not the middle class. It doesn't matter what your stupid capitalist dictionary changed the meanings to mean afterwards in order to totally strawman the far left

*middle
I think that was an effeminate joke related to something.

Use a search engine instead of being gay, or if this is staged just commit suicide because you are cluster B disordered.

I think you know that communist's issue is with the upper class, not the middle class

Search engine.

I'll just repeat what I said here "I think you know that communist's issue is with the upper class, not the middle class"

Google multi billion dollar opinion on this matter is not relevant to me

Go fuck yourself.

Just the fact that there's an idiot who showed up in this thread and is unironically trying to claim that communists are against the middle class is enough of a window into the perpetual stupidity on this board

You're 100% aware that communists are against the upper class, not the middle class. 100%. It's a 100% awareness. No middle ground. No grey area. You know fully. You know totally

What you are saying is true, what you don't realize is there is no making everyone equally rich, only equally poor. The best solution isn't to limit the amount of wealth an individual can have, but to just make more of it. Average american is filthy rich compared to the majority of the world.

>it'll be different this time
kys fag

The problem isn't capitalism, it's cronyism.

When the wealth is skewed that much, if there is no real force for people to be philanthropists or redistribute wealth through taxes, they won't. They'll just sit on wealth continue rent-seeking, interest-hoarding, capital-maximizing. All fundamentals factors of cronyism, not capitalism.

Big companies, which includes dictionary makers, changed the definition of "bourgeois" to use an older French etymology of the word which means "the middle class". That's not what it means in communist parlance, which obviously is the only context in which the term "bourgeois" EVER is used. So it was just a totally dishonest move by them to try to strawman the far left because they don't want us to tax them and take their shit and redistribute it to the poor and working (note middle) class

The upper class routinely deflect communist policies so they only affect, and destroy, the middle and lower class. Communists have never created a society that wasn't as unequal - often significantly less equal - than a capitalist nation has.
I don't like either communism or capitalism, I honestly think the two materialistic ideologies end up at the same finish line, just with one taking its time while the other races there.

But capitalism at least has that honeymoon period where it feels like it's working. Sure it only lasts for a generation or two, but that's a generation or two more than communism has ever had.

This is just rightwing schizo gibberish

Tax the rich. Take their shit, redistribute it to the poor and working (note, middle) class. And fuck off with your idiotic, incoherent schizo gibberish

> Que the mental gymnastics

Attached: E9FCFA5F-BD1E-4CF4-8767-AA6953C1FD39.jpg (719x1024, 114.29K)

No. The problem is capitalism. The problem is your fundamentally corrupt capitalist system in which your shit corrupt rightwing government grants control of entire industries to private individuals simply because they're rich.

This is known as "capitalism". Private, unelected citizens in control of everything just because they're rich just because your shit govt says so

It's not about making everyone "equal" in some cartoonish, comic book sense that rightwingers pretend it is. It's about nationalizing the means of production so that they operate for public good, rather than the private profit of a few. Instead of CEOs taking massive paychecks, you pay that money to the employees. You guarantee them living wages, unions, pensions. You don't allow billionaires to exist. You don't allow giant asset management firms buying up the entire real estate market to exist

>The problem is your fundamentally corrupt capitalist system in which your shit corrupt rightwing government
So, what's the guarantee that the commie leftist gubmint won't be just as corrupt as the current capitalist one? You commie retards think that once communism is established, rich and powerfull people just simply dissappear. No they just buy their way into the goverment and we're back to square one, only now the rich can fucks us in the ass even more thanks to communism.

There's definitely corruption, maybe get rid of that, before trying to uproot the very thing that madle you rich in the first place? The majority of the world actually doesn't like to be in servitude, be it to corporations or the state, you're just swapping one master for another much less personally invested master. That's definitely going to improve things.

Yeah I agree it's not real. It's some retarded, inexplicable meme that rightwingers say. "Real communism"? I have no clue WTF that is. I am a communist and I have literally no clue WTF you're talking about.

Nor have I ever talked to another communist who knew what the fuck you were talking about

You're all just totally incoherent, babbling, uneducated schizos on the rightwing

Equality is wrong

Capitalism is the corruption. Private ownership of industry is the corruption. Rightwing policies are the corruption. The "free market" is the corruption

Come on mods. Just ban me. Read the retardation of these replies in this thread and it's easy to see I do no good here

>Tax the rich
Have you even spent more than 2 seconds thinking about this, or do you just regurgitate slogans like a brainless idiot?

Where do you think that tax money goes? It doesn't go into your fucking pocket, that's for sure. All you do by "taxing the rich" is sequester wealth in another class of rich people - the kind who don't get taxed because they run the government itself. Imagine the reality of "tax the rich" - anyone genuinely successful cut down by the state bureaucracy as some politically connected dweeb steals all the wealth for himself and his cronies in government.

You will still have failing infrastructure, broken roads, no mass transit, niggers on every block, but the government owners will have their rich mansions and lavish lifestyles.

For fucks' sake we are in the midst of ANOTHER political scandal where the president of the united states was sending tax money to ukraine, having them hire his son at $300k/year, and then taking a cut of that money for himself from his son on top of it. THAT is what "tax the rich" means. YOU getting fucked over by bureaucrats embezzling all the fucking tax money that you naively believe will go to you.

Woman-level of attention whoring. Post your butthole or something at least.

No people are the corruption. The corruption will exist when people exist. You will always have corruption.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monetary_reform_in_the_Soviet_Union,_1922–24
>Never ever has the communists taken on fiat currency
> According to Soviet archives, sovznaks were no longer issued after 14 February 1924. With an exchange rate of one gold ruble to 50,000 1923 sovznaks and one gold ruble to 50 billion 1922 sovznaks, all sovznaks in circulation were bought by the government between 7 March and 10 May 1924. The dual-currency system ended, and the monetary reform was complete. The Soviet Union’s currency circulation was optimised and the chervonet (later defined as the ruble) was again pegged to gold, the universal storage of value before the adoption of the Bretton Woods system.
They certainly tried

Equality cannot exist you tard, so it can't be right or wrong, it is just impossible

It's wrong to have it as an ideal

Yes, because it is impossible. People should focus on realistic outcomes

People aren't equal, but the law should be applied equally. Meaning a retard nigger that rapes and murders should be hanged just the same as a rich white liberal fag who tries to groom kids

The ideal should be the betterment of your entire community, not a select minority.

When you have more egalitarian and equitable outcomes in society, you get a society that is generally more capable and successful. Perfect equality shouldn't be the goal, but rather the reduction of inequality should be. It is ok for successful people to have more, but it's NOT ok for successful people to have more at the cost of literally everyone else barely scraping a life in a dystopian hellhole where they own nothing, rent everything, and eat nothing but bugs.

>Come on mods. Just ban me
>J- just ban me
>doesn't even any rules
Did you want attention?

Imagine being a communist in current year. Cringe

He seems to be complaining against moderation, so if a janny wanted to ban him, he would go already

>Imagine being X in the current year
>Cringe
Neolib zoomers need to go back

Attached: 1654814851686.png (1400x800, 187.11K)