Whatever happened to “clean coal”?

Who said coal cannot be burned off clean if you filter out the sulfur etc, only thing that you emit is plant-friendly carbondioxide.

Attached: FCEF0031-9F8D-4001-B4C7-74317A0AB1A7.jpg (1536x1596, 327.7K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=YE5H5JYcLKg
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

The Greens will do everything to shut down nuclear power. They were behind the first buildup of coal power and are doing it again now.

I thinkmyour hangups on coal is due to yours been Lignite

Burn the coal pay the toll

>plant-friendly carbondioxide.
Hold up. Are you talking about the most dangerous gas that exists? The thing that will exterminate all life on earth? Are you insane? We need to eliminate _all_ carbondioxide in the atmosphere to save the planet.

Coal is the greenest fuel in existence. It provides plant air better than any other fuel and thus greens the Earth.

>plant-friendly carbondioxide
LEL

What are you LELing about?

This

Americans here don’t understand the level of retardation causing these issues in Germany. It’s as if flat earthers had their own political party in Germany.

Plants grave carbondioxide. It is literally what they breathe.

Attached: Screenshot 2022-01-30 at 20.20.30.png (910x700, 1.08M)

This is a serious discussion about coal, butthead.

Attached: Hurrr Durrrr.png (600x687, 36.55K)

The woman that advised the Sri Lankan government to ban artificial fertilizer is also part of the Greens in Germany. And the Greens still celebrate her ideas.

youtube.com/watch?v=YE5H5JYcLKg

Even Australians understand that Germany is fucked without coal.

Kek, shut down good and clean nuclear energy.
To start using old coal one.
Very high iq

globohomo flat earthers*

Attached: E-6jvSnWUBMEzia.jpg (1013x1151, 302.98K)

Uh yeah I don't think so chud. Carbondioxide is a harmful greenhouse gas. If carbondioxide emissions aren't completely eliminated earth will become one big desert. Just like Tatooine in Star Wars.

It takes some energy to filter out the stack emissions to make them clean. The cleaner you want to more energy or money it takes. Natural gas when it's cheap is easier to work with than coal. It's easier to transport, doesn't need as much filtering and can be used in a more reactive first stage gas turbine for load following.

You can load follow with coal but it's always a balancing act to keep the steam meeting demand. Add the complexity of needing ultra super critical steam running at crazy high pressure to get really good efficiency and it does become an ongoing pain.

Coal is greener than nuclear -- much more environmentally friendly.

What an absolutely hideous image.

It's what the Greens actually believe.

Attached: berlin brennt.png (2600x1455, 1.96M)

kek

On a scale from down syndrome to potato with googly eyes, exactly how retarded is your country?

It doesn't even emit less radioactive waste than nuclear

>invalid using a pug as tractor
very renewable, what innovation

Coal puts out far less radioactive waste than nuclear. Why do you think they have to figure out where to send and seal all that radioactive waste from nuclear plants?