When is Any Forums ACTUALLY going to refute this?

It really do be like that tho.

Attached: 1654832888918.jpg (474x474, 36.5K)

gas the jews and sage their threads.

Write this post with quill and parchment before I consider it.

check out the archives. Probably been refuted in 20 different ways.

We do not have to.

for a functioning militia the right to bear and keep arms yada yada ( except no militias of 600 men firing at once, you're all only allowed to fire once per minute, and one man at a time, we cannot in good conscience condone a society where 600 shots are allowed to be fired at one time in any given minute) - the founding fathers

Attached: FV9hE9oWIAA5eKf.jpg (1600x900, 182.13K)

Back in the day people could literally own canons
If the founding fathers had their way in 2022 you would be able to buy a small nuke at Walmart

They were allowed cannons too, because government armies had those muskets and cannons. So using this logic, anyone should be allowed have nuclear weapons, chemical weapons, drones, and SAM sites. It's only fair after all.

/thread

>Bulgaria

Attached: 12315162423562326.jpg (828x800, 52.24K)

We will never acknowledge lies.

Attached: 1654134152935.jpg (900x1200, 225.99K)

Amend the constitution then. Mass shootings are also a phenomenon of the past 30 years due to declining social capital and mental health

fpbp

Back in the day only landowning whites could vote, video and internet didn’t exist for the press, mixed-race couples were banned, fag marriages were banned and chemically castrated, and trannies were locked away. So let’s not get too selective at set a precedent you don’t want

so the british had muskets and the patriots has muskets

now soldiers have automatic machinguns and regular people have semi auto rifles. I think your trying to ask people to bring a knife to a gun fight cause that is what makes things fair lamo

Your opinion is only relevant if you write it down on parchment with a quill and ink pot.

>Anti turk square bullets
Dare I say based.

A jew made this thread

Why do we use 20th century laws to regulate 21st century niggers?

Cool, they were also allowed cannons and artillery... give us that bavk

They intended citizens to be armed to so the government feared it's own citizens.
That's the point of the 2nd amendment. Not so we could hunt deer.

Attached: armed birthright.jpg (640x489, 48.01K)

Attached: fixedit.png (2468x1620, 1.32M)

They had common sense nigger control back then.