They have officially begun the narrative of removing Biden
New York times says Biden is too old
>opinion piece written by a lying kike is canon
Please elaborate. Prove to me this isn't one of fifteen articles against Dems that NYT puts out to 'remain impartial'
not because he's corrupt, incompetent or demented. just too old. which disqualifies Trump too
>(((Goldberg)))
She needs a ride on the Holocoaster
He didn’t do what the kikes wanted which is to bomb Russia. That means we should unironically vote hime back.
They’re desperate to get away from this presidency even though they’ll find the party in general is in trouble
This is actually an indicator that they plan to reinstall Biden in 2024. when the people turn against you, you're likely getting a second term. it's all about demoralization. people loved Trump so he was removed. look at Clinton, Bush, Obama. no one liked them and they were reinstalled. Biden will win 2024 and then "die of covid" afterward, allowing Kamala Harris to sit in the oval office as the dollar enters its terminal hyperinflationary collapse phase. its going to be a wild ride
There's no reason to believe anything about that article; should it say the sky was blue, you should go outside and check.
>We have to suffer through another 2 years of this nigger
>Because if he is tossed out now we get Harris who will actually completely destroy the country
>And if Harris is kicked out it is Pelosi who will definitely destroy the country
Granted, nothing changes I guess because it's still the handlers in charge.
no they're giving the illusion that they're desperate to distance themselves from Biden. in reality, it is beneficial to the regime to keep a wholly-disliked puppet in the White House because it mocks, demoralizes, and depresses the American people. Biden will win despite a real approval rating of sub-10% (i wager that it's below 5%) and no one will do shit except share Brandon memes on Facebook. Presidents have always been installed vs. elected, but now, with the public so pacified and impotent, they can literally do the exact opposite of public sentiment in installing leaders and nothing bad will happen in response
> people loved Trump
Gonna stop you there
This. Removing one globohomo just means replacing them with a worse one.
Based. Fuck boomers.
your blue liberal shithole city is not an indicator of the entire country's sentiment. Trump was well-liked by 80% of the country. this was unacceptable to the regime
Drumpf lost.
What the fuck is wrong with me? Am I a fully braindead NPC? I see a NYT kike writing an article against Biden and suddenly my instinct is to defend him.
You are a contrarian retard is your issue. It doesn't matter what carrot they dangle in front of you. You will always be frothing at the mouth.
That nigga is dumb as fuck, he was a meme to give you backwoods idiots some limelight and see how retarded you really are by choosing a retarded leader. Sleepy pedo needs to go, a libertarian should take his place
>Trump gained over 10 million more votes from 2016 to 2020
>To contrast, Obama lost over 6 million votes from 2008 to 2012.
People loved Trump.
The long knives are out. Neo-liberal policies are cancer.
i actually agree with you, and was never a Trump supporter. but he served a purpose after eight years of Obama. but now they're pedal to the metal with demoralization and embracing the full collapse of America, both financially and socially. they'll keep Biden in for 2024
Trump was great. Sucks that the media brainwashed you into believing otherwise simply because he was an insider career politician.
Here come the Tucker boomers.
When I see a tame nigger, my first instinct is to make sure my wallet hasn't been stolen. Then the rational brain circuit kicks in and reminds me that this nigger is Carlton Banks, not Li'l Wayne.
There's nothing wrong with instinctively distrusting an institution like the NYT. It's infested with jewish women.
Lol except he didn't
500k tests with test algorithm, election results came out exactly as algorithm predicts...deep fake election results
>two men run for president
>one of them has ran once
>he won
>he's the current president
>the other has ran twice
>lost both times
>one time was forced to resign in shame after it was revealed that he plagiarized in college to get grades
>incumbents don't ever get more votes the second time
>bush I didn't, clinton didn't, bush ii didn't, obama didn't
>incumbent gets more votes
>in fact, incumbent gets the most votes ever in United States history
>other guy gets the most votes ever even more
>it's the guy who has lost twice; resigned in shame once
>now he's the president
>only after literally being installed by the military
>but the military couldn't even be trusted to not kill the president; so they didn't even have bullets.
>now the guy that got the most votes ever is the most unpopular president ever
i can't believe more people don't look back at the (not)military occupation of DC and see that as a North Korea moment. we had soldiers stationed all around the entire city; with no weapons. they had gun, no bullets. it was a literal masquerade show of force.
unbelievable. like i literally still can't believe it happened.