State your IQ and whether you think this image is real or not

State your IQ and whether you think this image is real or not

Attached: 1200x-1.jpg (1200x1224, 155.25K)

95 and yes

~150
Yes

Real yes, edited extensively yes

165

Don’t be a retard

130, not real but based on real images.

75
no

255 IQ here, mensa certified. I can declare this photo is FRAUDULENT and FAKE.

Attached: 1645586261999.jpg (620x675, 70.92K)

Your mother was and still most certainly is a cum dumpster

over 9000, ofc it's real nigger this is an image board

Forget IQ is 130 but more like 95

132 and I don't trust nasa

>138
I don't give a shit, everything is a lie and my eyes can't be trusted.

130 and it seems everything is oriented toward the brightest star
Kinda funky looking when I saw it first

130 and yes. The lines that look like curved streaks are from the effect of gravitational lensing on the galaxy images.
There is a similar pic from Hubble, but lower resolution. Impressive but nothing new.

144, no this is fake photoshop. Why else would they be taking a picture of the same direction for over 50 years, shouldn't there be galaxies all around us? Only retards of mixed race heritage think space is real.

No clue what my actual IQ is but any half-skilled digital artist could easily fake this in Photoshop. Color in some dots, add liquify and distortion effects, add some lens flares, etc. All those white-blue stars look like they were literally copypasted.

each light there is not a star but a galaxy of 100 billion stars. thats how insignificant you are. now get back to work.

/thread

IQ: More than OP
Answer: who cares

Attached: 1643341498989.gif (498x498, 586.22K)

44
No

165 and no

130-140

Fake and GAY

congratulations you can repeat what scientists say, you are now on par with an actual monkey

130, fake.

>All those white-blue stars look like they were literally copypasted

Well no shit genius. Stars are just points of light, of course they all look the same.

it's as real as picrel. because space is fake and gay.
>t. literal 110 iq not done online

Attached: 767463764723444.png (1230x1189, 1.89M)

200
This image does in fact exist. I can see it with my own eyes on my screen

pictures of space are almost always edited because what we can see with our shitty human eyes isn't all that interesting

>star are just points of light
you've almost got it

Is anything real?
Iq is a spook

First image: Taken by the Hubble 20 years ago.

Second image: Taken by the JWST a few weeks ago.

They're literally the same image with the color and brightness boosted. It's a literal scam.

Attached: Hubble vs JWST.webm (640x480, 596.22K)

135
Yes, but edited obviously. Also I don’t trust nasa kikes. Nor the cgi fuckery at the ISS. Moon landing footage is fake

>They're literally the same image with the color and brightness boosted. It's a literal scam.

wrong

Attached: 1657598853524.webm (720x720, 2.47M)

75 hell no, christ is king!

Which "other china" is correct?

132, Christ is King

>brightest star
>star

140
Not enough info. What am I looking at?

They should use this shit to get us some pics of the fucking moon and planets if it is legit.

IQ 110
Fake. Everything that we get trough our media devices is inherently fake unless proven otherwise.

144 no

6 million.
The image itself is as real as anything else.

167
No. I've seen better graphics on Doctor Who.
James Webb telescope. Launched from and undisclosed patch of the South American Jungle on Christmas Day. Say's it all.

There was a subtle comedic observation there and it went right over your head.

>Jew dome theory
I can't wait until the world figures out you are inbred schitzos

Fake, why? Media. My IQ? Lost in the sauce capt.

91 and yes.

It's fake. I'm smart. Fuck you.

Attached: 1334705321166.jpg (375x500, 86.26K)

Name one thing wrong with inbreeding that cannot be blamed on already having faulty genes?

those aren't stars or galaxies, that was just me shining a flashlight into the telescope

85, it's fake and earth is flat

I FUCKING LOVE SCIENCE