Do you Even Understand The Term 'Anarchy', In The Political sense?

Watch and learn.

youtube.com/watch?v=zWu_8oluENM

Attached: 1_YyDB9Hf4yD44RseexnTJdA.png (768x768, 37.38K)

Other urls found in this thread:

antimatrix.org/Convert/Books/Under_The_Sign_of_Scorpion/Under_the_Sign_of_the_Scorpion.html
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

Anarchists are useful idiots easily discarded. For reference view the personal experiences of anarchists that moved to the USSR to fight for socialism or in the Spanish civil war
Easily used, easily discarded

>anarchists that moved to the USSR to fight for socialism
>literally NOT anarchists
Watch the video you stupid idiot

Anarchists think they can have order without hierarchies. A fantasy.

>Watch the video you stupid idiot
No. If you are unaware of these individuals I can provide records
>ignores the Barcelona commune
You're arguing like a kike

>without hierarchies
>do you even understand the term 'anarchy'
I guess I was correct. You have no idea.

Yes
It basically means "Waaaaaaaaahhhh"

I gave you the Noam Chomsky definition

>Watch and learn.
no

Yeah well I'm giving you the actual definition, not from some establishment gatekeeper.

Nice to know you fear us kike.

Once a statist bootlicker always a statist bootlicker I guess.

Seethe

Attached: angry-kermit-gif-3.gif (490x341, 338.01K)

Real anarchy has never been tried before. - (((Bakunin))) would have said this.

antimatrix.org/Convert/Books/Under_The_Sign_of_Scorpion/Under_the_Sign_of_the_Scorpion.html

In this way, the Russian society had been transformed into a herd of cattle, just as the freemason Mikhail Bakunin had (((predicted))). "Dictionnaire Universel" (p. 114) confirms that Bakunin really was a freemason.

What "traditional" anarchy should've been called is collectivism.

2 PETER 2
9 The Lord knoweth how to deliver the godly out of temptations, and to reserve the unjust unto the day of judgment to be punished:

10 But chiefly them that walk after the flesh in the lust of uncleanness, and despise government. Presumptuous are they, selfwilled, they are not afraid to speak evil of dignities.

11 Whereas angels, which are greater in power and might, bring not railing accusation against them before the Lord.

12 But these, as natural brute beasts, made to be taken and destroyed, speak evil of the things that they understand not; and shall utterly perish in their own corruption;

13 And shall receive the reward of unrighteousness, as they that count it pleasure to riot in the day time. Spots they are and blemishes, sporting themselves with their own deceivings while they feast with you;

14 Having eyes full of adultery, and that cannot cease from sin; beguiling unstable souls: an heart they have exercised with covetous practices; cursed children:

15 Which have forsaken the right way, and are gone astray, following the way of Balaam the son of Bosor, who loved the wages of unrighteousness;

16 But was rebuked for his iniquity: the dumb ass speaking with man's voice forbad the madness of the prophet.

17 These are wells without water, clouds that are carried with a tempest; to whom the mist of darkness is reserved for ever.

18 For when they speak great swelling words of vanity, they allure through the lusts of the flesh, through much wantonness, those that were clean escaped from them who live in error.

19 While they promise them liberty, they themselves are the servants of corruption: for of whom a man is overcome, of the same is he brought in bondage.

You think you can have order with control. You are the delusional one.

>Seethe
KEK Goto bed Gnome

Everyone should read Peter Kropotkin. A single Youtube video wont cut it.

>can you stop looking at what I do and instead focus on what I say?

>A single Youtube video wont cut it.
But it truly does. Such a simple concept at it's core.

go somewhere else, aristotle. Clearly us poltards are too uncivilized to properly grasp your enlightened wisdom

>Clearly us poltards are too uncivilized to properly grasp your enlightened wisdom
For the most part I agree