Everything they did in the past, both good and bad, would not exist. You one get one choice. Who would it be? Why?
Mine is Cheney. He was efficient, but didnt do anything altruistic and he likely was the cause of the second Iraq War. Plus no Liz to boot. A little less economic success is worth a timeline without the Iraq war.
Im not sure about the cheneys. I hope theyre lives are good. But I never got to have a real bonding with someone who was native american, my age, and shared similar interest bcuz of this site. youtu.be/m_sybsobNR0
Daniel Peterson
Lincoln or dad of jews
Jace Kelly
Wilson is the source but as other anons said there was still clutch potential in 1919.
I think the answer is FDR although that makes ww2 and the cold War a wildcard. From a sociopathic viewpoint FDR is frame perfect.
You need a high powerlevel to say FDR. If you want something easier difficulty, you'd say LBJ.
If you want real wildcards, you could say Caeser Augustus, but it'd be pointless because not only are they repeating the actions of Sulla but there's 90 civil wars to come. So the proper answer would be sulla, but then you don't have a decisive answer to the question of endless civil war in Rome.
Neoliberal economic theory has been a disaster for the white race
David James
Gavrilo Princip
Joshua Jenkins
Friedman isn't actually neoliberal. He's an infiltrator. Hayek is where you'd go.
The reason the answer is never Friedman is because Reagan never actually attempted neoliberalism.
Daniel Young
Dumb. Ww1 was inevitable from power vacuum of Ottomans. You just bought humanity like 2 months of time, good job.
Angel Taylor
Hitler. I really can't stand the eternal media presence of this austrian loser. every damn channel, 24/7 coverage of german failures and evils because of this fuck. This insane cultist obsession from both his admirers and ardent haters is extremely irritating.
this or just russians. serb humanoids would have never made facts from their ambitions if they hadn't been pushed and supported by russian wannabe jews.