Henry Kissinger says he thinks 'a cease-fire line should be drawn at where the war started.'

impossible now. Russia is never going to agree to go back to the pre-February status-quo. Ukraine and their backers aren't either.

Well he's suggesting they 'cede land' from 2014, as in, go back to the same situation the day before this war began, but cede no new land. That's the part that he says was misunderstood in Davos.

Here is the rest of the comments he made from the article while on the Ukraine topic

Judy Woodruff:

The U.S. and NATO have said they're prepared to do whatever it takes to support Ukraine. But does that mean indefinitely? Does that mean…

Henry Kissinger:

Yes, but that is — that is exactly the question.

I, therefore, hope that a negotiated outcome will be found. We cannot give up — Ukraine, above all, cannot give up territory that it had when the war started, because this would be symbolically dangerous for NATO and for the problems we face in the — in Asia.

Judy Woodruff:

Do you believe Xi Jinping is looking at this and thinking he is more likely to want to take over Taiwan or less likely, watching what Russia's experience in Ukraine is?

Henry Kissinger:

Well, he must know that an all-out attack on Taiwan or any kind of attack designed to take it over is going to be resisted by America in its current mood.

So, I think an all-out attack on Taiwan is the last thing that the Chinese plan right now.

Judy Woodruff:

Do you think it would be better now for the United States to drop any ambiguity about Taiwan and its relationship with China and just say flatly the U.S. will defend Taiwan?

Henry Kissinger:

No.

If we abandon that and declare Taiwan an independent country, then China will almost be forced to undertake military action, because it has been so long and for — so fiercely a part of their domestic problem. So, the ambiguity is to prevent conflict.

But the deterrent effect needs to be also firm.

Judy Woodruff:

so I hear you saying you think the U.S. has made it clear enough that it will come to Taiwan's defense?

Henry Kissinger:

I think so. I mean, the very concentration of our forces makes that clear.

>Stop fighting the russians goy
Time to ramp up the attack on Russia

Honestly he makes a good argument that negotiating a ceasefire and giving Russia the disputed territory theyve claimed for years would be the solution that results in the least amount of bloodshed and risk of nuclear warfare, although it wouldn't really be in line with the expansionist goals of NATO and the United States

Hank is trying to have it both ways here.

Attached: GET_BACK_IN_THE_CAR_michelle_carter.jpg (960x692, 96.67K)

Guy has some of the dirtiest hands of anyone alive currently. Perfect example of a great, but terrible, man.

Reminder:
>Who Is Henry Kissinger? f. The Great Reset
files.catbox.moe/hywgdj.mp4
>KISSINGER AND THE UN SMART CITIES
youtu.be/wLbsDOB0B7Y
^ This video goes deep into some uncomfortable truths, on Israel, on Kushner, on Kissinger, on Putin, on alot of people.
>Henry Kissinger came to Moscow to discuss new financial system with Putin
english.pravda.ru/society/133329-kissinger_putin/
>Henry Kissinger: 'At critical junctures Russia has saved the world’s equilibrium':
rbth.com/lifestyle/328867-henry-kissinger-on-russia

Attached: 1648156052223.jpg (1784x1172, 691.6K)

Attached: kissingerputinnwo.png (940x2284, 499.58K)

LMAO holy COPE

>guys were losing

> LETS JUST GO BACK TO BEFORE WE STARTED FUCKIN AROUND AND PRETEND NOTHING EVER HAPPENED

COPE N SEETHE

sanhedrin, so israel completes its world domination

>Well he's suggesting they 'cede land' from 2014
technically, no he isn't. He argued to return to the pre-Feb 2022 status quo. That status quo was Ukraine intending to retake Crimea and the Donbass, and amassing resources to do so. He didn't say Ukraine should agree to cede the Donbass and Crimea to Russia.

Attached: Crimea Plan.png (787x868, 75.74K)

>Perestroika Deception - Sino-soviet Scissors Strategy Explained
joshf731.substack.com/p/jewish-controlled-geopolitics-sino

Attached: 193944485590596.png (887x2965, 2.05M)

I remember him saying something like "Russia should pull out of Ukraine before they cease to be among the ranks of the great powers." shortly after the war broke out. It's interesting that he seems to have completely dropped that line of thinking. Seems like he was one of those experts that thought Russia would collapse Soon™ because of the sanctions.

So my question is, why should we listen to someone like that? They were dead wrong about the war before.

by what i have managed to gatehr during my life, due to life experience and a handful of carefully obfuscated historical facts;
if vodkas do notreclaim the entire land,
and turn that poolish part in west to a national park filled with booby traps
and kick the cunts back to pooland
i will be 100% certain that all of these cunts work together.

How does it make sense to return to that era and be 'amassing resources to retake' the land? It would involve calling a ceasefire and then putting off the conflict for an unknown amount of time. If they're going to try to retake it then this is the time to do so, but yes you're right since he doesn't say to give up the land. I just think it would be a silly way to do it because Ukraine wouldn't be getting supplied like this on a whim from NATO either, and a big push to retake Crimea and the Donbass would be not much of a smaller conflict than right now, depending on how Russia reacted.

In what world does Ukraine have the capacity to retake any of its lost territory? In what fucking world is the West able to draw this war out long enough to get the results Kissinger wants?