Cultural appropriation retards

We need a word to describe the woke twats who cry about cultural appropriation. The word that I have coined to mock these crybabies is "wiacom." The word is portmanteau of "wannabe" and "Viacom." It's pronounced like "Viacom" but with a "w" instead of a "v." The reason why I used part Viacom's name is because Viacom was well known for being extremely zealous in its attempts to protect its intellectual property. Whiny minorities act in a similarly over zealous, hostile manner when attempting to protect their "culture" from "appropriation" from evil whitey.
And to any retards who are going to say "how dare you compare weak, oppressed, harmless uwu to a multimedia conglomerate," the comparison to Viacom is apt as these woke retards have tried to make "Indigenous intellectual property" a thing. For those of you who don't know what "indigenous intellectual property" is, imagine copyright law but based on race.

Here is the definition of "wiacom"

>a person (usually an ethic minority) who is overly zealous about defending their or another group's culture from cultural appropriation.

Be sure to use this next time a wokelet whines about cultural appropriation use this word to describe them.

Attached: 5f52019a7ed0ee001e25d721.jpg (700x525, 88.6K)

>We need a word to describe the woke twats who cry about cultural appropriation
Faggots

My GF has a quarian fetish, she wants to wear catsuits and helmets during sex but I think it's an alien culture appropriation and refuse to engage in such disrespectful kinks.

Larpers

Those words aren't specific enough.

By design. These faggots are not important enough to warrant their own insult. They're just faggots

harley riders

Attached: fags.png (976x537, 588.63K)

>You can't appropriate Native culture
>Cajun identity isn't by decent, its a culture and anyone can be a Cajun

They do need their own insult because just calling someone a faggot doesn't target their retarded beliefs.

Let us assume that there is a tribe selling No-Face dolls.
Then some random white libtard also starts selling No-Face dolls.

Why shouldn't the tribe that originated the idea be able to sue for IP rights?

The same people who are promoting wokism the most are the same people who are living on land stolen by natives. They will not engage in that talking point.

As a Native, I don't literally view every American and Canadian as colonizing racists. I view the US government as an empire of evil that will never keep it's promises, even if they're codified in an enforceable contract.

The woke patrol is intolerable because they persoanally benefit from all the racist and colonizing stuff they claim to hate. Where do you think iPhone parts, Starbucks coffee, and North face jackets come from? Not an ethical source that's anti racist!

The left would collapse if there were demands to return all land to Natives because they won't do it. And it'd be obvious at that point the last 6+ years of anti racism wokery was a lie. If Congress won't return DC to Natives to fix racism and equity issues, then it was never about racism, was it?

Race based indigenous intellectual property is incompatible with current copyright law. Copyright is supposed to expire at some point. A specific no face doll can maybe be protected by copyright, but only by the person who created that one specific no face doll not their entire ethnicity and that is how it should be. Imagine making some shitty anime and then the creator of the anime artstyle sues you. That would be stupid.

But that specific type of doll is a unique cultural artifact to a specific Tribe. Perhaps they should be compensated when outsiders rip this idea off?

A no-face doll is not the same thing as a normal doll, and it comes from a specific group.
Maybe we need new IP laws to deal with ethnic group cultural heritage.

Perhaps Natives and Cajuns could make some sort of alliance again, like the old times?
Push for more autonomy somehow?

Or how about, "All items marketed and sold as Cajun has to send a % of sales to support Cajun cultural heritage"

No. I reject the idea of permanent ownership over things people have assigned value to.

So should the tribal political unit have any ownership over anything?

Beat me to it

how do you know they dont have american indian ancestry?

So red (brown) skins can't wear cowboy hats.

I didn't say nothing.