How can we match the rhetorics and charisma of the left? We have the moral ground, yet we always seem to lose in debates.
How can we match the rhetorics and charisma of the left? We have the moral ground...
Other urls found in this thread:
We always lose because "the left" dictates who wins.
It's a bunch of glownigger assets disseminating propoganda
We should just ban everyone we disagree with, like they do.
Bit muh freeze peach
You should kys
If you honestly think Vaush didn't get destroyed here then you're as much of a faggot as he is youtu.be
Vaush is a literal pedophile
>left
>charisma
the major failing of the left is that they have no charisma or natural leaders due to being the party of estrogen and faggots
>we
>kike
kys
You fools, you utter imbeciles. Vaush could wipe all right-wingers off the face of the earth, without even using 3% of his power, your only hope is to submit, and get topped.
Most of the platforms we engage them in, they have the numbers and of course the platform is on their side. Anything we say will get us banned, think about it for a second - can you name a popular right winger on twitch?
You can't.
The rights combined IQ is under 80
if we could speak frealy, the left will lose 100% of the time. not cause they are wrong(they are), but cause they are a bunch of brats, kids that reality is all based on what they saw on tv shows, and what their faggot professor speaks on campus.
match? the left employs apologetics and appeal to emotion, they do not employ reasonable argumentation and logic, they are all pathos and no logos or ethos. to match them would be to stoop to their level and attack their character, appeal to infantile emotions, and ignore reality.
In all fields.
to bad he only speaks alone in his room, to a bunch of kids
>muh debates
Let's see how these tankie faggots hold up in a physical fight, or better yet bring back dueling.
The right doesn't have the sexual urge to groom children.
>How can we match the rhetoric
Gish-galloping and constantly changing positions so much that it's impossible to know what you stand for other than some vague terms like "communism" or "democratic socialism".
>and charisma of the left?
"Leftism" is only charismatic and popular because it's propped up by millions of dollars in funding and support for the governments of Five Eyes countries and independent propaganda organizations masquerading and NGO's. And because opposing viewpoints are immediately censored.
>We have the moral ground, yet we always seem to lose in debates.
Even if debates weren't meaningless spectacles to impress people of middling or lower intelligence, it would be impossible to "win" against somebody like Vaush or Hassan Piker because they never argue in good faith. Their goal is to advance the agenda(s) of the people paying them.
>if we could speak frealy, the left will lose 100% of the time
True right wing political ideas are too controversial even for their advocates to speak about freely. How many people have the balls to openly state that they would deport all shitskins and burn the usurers/bankers at the stake? That they would remove women from the workplace and teach racial science to the children?
This will all come in time, with the great paradigm shift. It is a slow, but inevitable process
I want to debate Vaush with my fists.
any leftist show their hypocrisy when israel is brought up they go in about 30 seconds from a humanitarian to a supremacist giving you reason after reason why jews should have a racial country where they can shoot toddlers for not being jews
Every leftist debate tactic deconstructed:
>get BTFO and have no answer
>pivot to something your opponent has an easy answer to to distract them
>explore the new topic once they take the bait
It happens EVERY time. If you stick to the Jesse lee Peterson style of debate (keep repeating the question Verbatim until you get an answer) they can’t perform this trick and end up looking retarded.
>As you can see, I can establish that X inevitably leads to Y and is verifiable by established laws of economics
>Yes, but have you accounted for the fact that I don't believe "truth" exists, therefore discounting your "laws" and "research"?
>Therefore, I win.
"""""debates""""" with tankies.
>Thinking Jesse lee Peterson ever looks not retarded in a debate
You don't have to expose your IQ like this, literally no one asked.
This is your real answer OP. Deny any and all of their premises and ask why they support Zionism and Israel. Will probably fail to convince normies since they stopped noticing hypocrisy a long time ago.
Reactionaries are just that, reactionary. Unable to come up with fresh ideas, they are constantly living in the past instead of taking their ideas to a "utopian future" like commies and liberals. Couple this with most right wing ideologies requiring delayed gratification, which is becoming increasingly hard to find, and you have a feckless and boring right wing hell bent on staying behind.
Literally, every leftist hates Isreal, Vaush got banned from twitch for saying that Isreal should be nuked, are you just pretending to be retarded?
It's hard to win when you will literally get banned for saying anything out of the accepted terms, debating them when they control the narrative is just stupid. This has been the case throughout history
>To argue with a person who has renounced the use of reason is like administering medicine to the dead
>I make it a point never to argue with people for whose opinion I have no respect
>I don’t argue with my enemies; I explain to their children
Or just take the Napoleon route. "Intellectuals" are just propaganda mouth pieces of the establishment.. you don't try to reason with them, you shoot them.
he has stated several times he is basically a nerd, a looser. only 3 world retards like you think him making a deep voice is charismatic
The right isn't propped up by multibillion dollar silicon valley tech companies like the left is. Everyone was censored and banned from social media. The game has been rigged.
Now the right is just busy living their lives and affecting real political change at the local, state, and national level. They won't let us play on their kike platforms.
I got banned from Vaush's Youtube for saying "he might just be a right wing traditionalist" when he was debating some random teenager and calling him a Nazi.
I got banned from his discord which is completely staffed by trannies, when I used the term "biological male" when debating whether troons should be allowed to play sports with their fake gender.
Vaush is pathetic and will never debate someone like Nick Fuentes of Alt Hype since they don't give a fuck and will spit straight politically incorrect facts that would destroy Vaush in less than 10 minutes.
He is just the classic sociology major who thinks they are political savants meanwhile their entire ontology got fucked by Professor Shlomostein who they willfully forked over 4 years of their life and $30,000 of their money.
Why won't you debate Nick, fatty?