Where do I find history book with an alternate version of history that doesn't hurt my feelings?
Inserting your feelings into history is the problem faggot flag.
Just try to get an accurate account, why is this so fucking hard for you degenerate eunuchs?
History books should have history not feelings
Get history literature that is generally as specific in subject as possible. For example, instead of "European World History", you'd want a book more like "London during the 18th century". Generally the people who write those kinds of books are extremely autistic and honest in conveying the results of their research.
>History has a liberal bias
>Meaningless pilpul statement
it's not hard if you just search for books published before, say, 1950
...
"Man Corn"?
Thanks for the tip, I really don't like my feelings hurt so this is great.
here's one for you too fren!
you might actually want to go back to 1930 or so
Did norm actually say that? I wouldn't doubt it.
I think it's important that books detailing human history are as ideologically neutral as possible in order to more accurately describe the time periods which are being described. Don't you agree, user? It's important for historians to not let their modern biases get in the way of presenting history as objectively as possible. Right?
>redditor cries about hurt feelings
>post that hurt his feelings downvoted
Why are your feeling hurt? Its natural to get angry when people lie to you, thats not le hurt feefees
you fucking crushed him with that downvote. what job will you have in the marxist utopia?
Fpbp
You want to look for personal accounts/diaries. Ive read a couple on african colonialism and its a completely differen vibe than modern woke crap.
The funny thing is, this new woke history is literally called historical revisionism. As in that's the name of the discipline. They aren't shy about it. They are revising history to suit more woke perspectives
Reddit poster has a point
It’s the equivalent of claiming the anglos and saxons of England were just peaceful non-warring people before Danes and Scandinavians started wrecking their shit.
Sauce? I want to use this against retarded leftoids in the future
It's pretty easy to find this sort of literature once you find a few spellings that were used in that era that have changed then search for the old spelling in exact quotes
The noble savages were well on their way to hunting the buffalo to extinction without help from European guns and conservation.
This. Look for a book that has first sources in it. The book stores in our national parks used to have a great selection pertaining to their area. Might still be like that. You could search for national parks and forts and battlefields then look through their online bookstores.
I've found a couple excellent books by going through obscure wikipedia pages looking for their sources when doing research. Citation citing citations. You eventually get to the source.
>The victor won't make themselves better than they were
Nigger we have a mountain with the 4 confederate generals carved into it cause the klan wanted to rewrite history saying the South won
>Reading the invaders personal diaries is different than the full historical context
Wow what a surprise.
“Historians” do, illiterate retard
They won't care. They'll just say history needs to be revised. They're a time cult that thinks the present is the only meaningful instance. Everything needs to be viewed through the present lens.
Well yeah, that's sort of the point of cultural communism. There's nothing but the present.
Lol. You will never be a woman.
Revisionist History is not new. University History departments usually have a published professor or two that specializes. I had one in 1980.
There are many more in the Age of Woke.
t. Oldfart
>lose a conflict
>just pretend you've won
genius, why doesnt everyone do this? That way nobody will lose anything ever again
This. Old history books avoid this problem completely and are typically not any less accurate than more recent books, and often are more accurate. For instance, the best and most comprehensive history of the decline of the Roman Empire, still to this day, was published in 1700s. Anybody studying the subject seriously and academically will read it.
Avoid recent books, avoid Jewish authors, it's not too hard to avoid the nonsense.
American Injuns were racist and didn't believe immigration. The white man didn't call them savages for no reason...bloodthirsty animals they were..
We do, it’s called “everyone gets a trophy” and part of the reason we’re in the mess we’re in now.
>For instance, the best and most comprehensive history of the decline of the Roman Empire, still to this day, was published in 1700s.
Sauce plz