How is Destiny so good at debating? Whenever there's a panel he's on, he's always the voice of reason

How is Destiny so good at debating? Whenever there's a panel he's on, he's always the voice of reason.

Attached: 1656924128823.png (534x424, 316.56K)

Other urls found in this thread:

odysee.com/@PoliticallyProvoked:6/debate!-destiny-martinez-debate-the:f
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

>e celeb
herbed

I don't know who this is but by his looks I can tell he's never the voice of reason but the reason of faggotry and cope

NOPE.

Go back to discord, tranny

this the same pedo who got caught by some kid mothers filming him???

High verbal IQ.

He's a smart guy, doesnt mean he's right about everything, a lot of the more important topics he debates come down to values but often times the people he argues with don't really understand that and end up arguing tertiary view points.

Cringe moderate leftist e-celeb that couldn't get high APM anymore so had to switch to a new grift. Also a faggot. Don't care.

Hes starting to suck but thats because hes scared of the good topics. Plus hes still a racist fag thats trying hard to hide it so he will constantly have hate watchers waiting to report him

I think he mentioned that he even thought of quitting politics due to how bad the political discourse has fallen; he's just in a blackpilled phase. Also nobody wants to solo debate him.

I honestly dont care if hes a racist, hes a mutt so its ironic. I yearn for based debates that add something to the discourse. All these fuckers like philosophy but they're too scared to be philosophers

He’s really not, he just sounds like it.
odysee.com/@PoliticallyProvoked:6/debate!-destiny-martinez-debate-the:f

This. Most stupid people are easily won over subconsciously by vocabulary and sound of voice alone.

His style is so incredibly formulaic that when somebody refuses to play his game he looks like a complete idiot.
QRD on how to have DesTINY's "High verbal IQ"
>Wait for the other person to present an argument
>Either move the goal posts or call the other person cringe with a compliment sandwich
>Go on a tangent
>Start arguing a hypothetical within a tangent
>"Do you have a source? Uhh that's not a reliable source, you have not source. YOU HAVE NO SAUCE NO SAUCE NO SAUCE NO SAUCE NO SAUCE"
>"Now you're just going in circles/on tangents"
>Repeat until the everyone forgets the original point that was being made
>"Let's just move on because you're getting off topic"
Voila, you can now debate just like desTINY

Suck my inverted penis incel chud. Cope and seethe incel chud +ratio

Attached: download.jpg (225x225, 6.42K)

Fuentes, the Gunt, Warski, Baked, Cumia, Mayr, Venti, The Quartering, Destiny, Southern, etc... and all the other e-celeb lolcows are a huge group of degenerates and pedo's... people don't understand how depraved these people are.. they are no better than leftist groomers or Hollywood.

Stop fucking promoting and supporting these people you fucking cuck's.

Abuse stimulants and talk fast

nobody gives a fuck about that e-whore's panels or that spic that destiny debated.

Buy an ad faggot

>Advertising or begging

As much as he doesn't like to admit it, it's his rhetoric. His sociopathic nature lets him dig deep at someone, essentially dehumanizing them and making himself seem like the superior human being, ergo he is more likely to be right.

The problem is he's a cuck.

Why is it always a Brazilian who posts these shit tier spam threads?

a literal cuck

the only guy who ever even came close to beating destiny was nick fuentes not a surprise that they're best friends now

He's a self admitted cuck. Nothing to see here.

Saged

Destiny and Vaush (and others like them) are really good at what I call "shallow spread" debate. The idea is to bring up as many facts as possible (the more the better) to sound credible on any particular matter, and to disallow going in depth on any particular idea by jumping to another fact to bring up another argument. The confusion that this process causes allows for room to bring up more facts about other topics, where the process repeats itself indefinitely. This is a similar approach used by a lot of bible thumpers (look up Kent Hovind debates). You can successfully use this style to come up with wild assertions and lines of argument and portray complete credibility.

They do research into topics and they have extremely good memories and high verbal IQ, they are able to keep the conversation together well, but most of their arguments are fractured and incomplete. The topics they debate don't lend themselves well to 3 hour verbal conversations, which is why academics stick to writing to adhere to strict rigor (or at least attempt to).

I'm in a poly relationship. The reason why I'm in a poly relationship is because I don't give a fuck if my girlfriend goes and fucks another guy, because I know that she's coming home to me at the end of the night. Because we love each other. Because I'm a cool fucking person. I know that. If I'm not going to gatekeep the fuck out of who my girlfriend fucks, you think I'm going to chase you around?

please watch the show, user
if i don't get more followers, i'll have to quit
please, please, please
i beg you