Why do you blame leftists for minimalistic architecture/art?
I give you super easy example of what I mean. Barocco opera theaters were stunning. Amount of details in operas, all the decorations and even warhammer like mechs showing anciend gods for example. These theaters were analogs of modern cinemas. And they were gone in 19th sentury without lefties etc because of economic reasons. Opera before and after 18th sentury was just abstract something in compare with Barocco opera. Why arent you criticizing opera for not being Baroccan then? It has less details, abstract etc.
People who blame art for less amount of details, being loose or abstract just show that they are more like niggers attracted to fancy things. Its relative to basedboys fapping on amount of megapixels in new samsung handy. Im not talking that classical art is bad or whatever, but it had own reasons in technique of making and core of art like composition, study of forms and color is still advanced now. World nowadays just dont need millions of artists (who did same job as photographers do now). If we want to have Leonardo tier artist - we have to grow 1 million bad artists making everyday routine like protocolling of Sir A visiting Sir B in Vincenza palace. So you see whole classical art as something BASED but you will never use it in your everyday life (as people did those times).
If you love classical art - donate to save old door in your town, or to greek vase reconstructor, dont be nigger. If we talk about something as elitist as old art - you have at least learn more about it. Touch it, save money to visit Rome to feel the beauty of blossoms near Forum, rather then buying another GTX4324234
>Why do you blame leftists for minimalistic architecture/art? I blame jews. They've run the world since WWII and they've built nothing beautiful. The world was more beautiful when Europeans were in charge.
Where architect can get 10 thousands marble specialists and 100 masters like Raphael to build pic related?
Henry Wilson
Obviously you need to put more 70 IQ niggers through harvard.
Asher Roberts
>because of economic reasons Capitalism bad. Modernist and postmodernist have not created a single good thing, reducing it to "fancy" frills shows you're an artistic retard.
Adam Campbell
>Capitalism bad What country is capitalist? The US? We're a central planning economy. The US GDP has a higher percentage of government spending than China. We're more central planning than China. Do you think the EU is any different? Where is capitalism? Not in the US. Not in the EU. Not in Asia. Not Hong Kong. Not Japan.
Joseph James
Obviously, that's why i was quoting the OP and not talking to you. Architecture didn't turn to shit just cause of "economic reasons".
Jonathan Ward
Artist sees simple shapes and simple forms even in most detailed artworks. Whats a good artwork then?
Btw modernism created a huge piece of classic look of european cities. Its simply unreal to recreate palazzo for example, because we can count on our hands amount of people who can work with stone etc this way.
I mean economy has big impact here. What do you mean by something good created before modernism then? What changed in core things like light, colouring and composition during 20th sentury?
Brody Howard
>What changed in core things like light, colouring and composition during 20th sentury? Only everything? Art has become an artist's navel-gazing soul search of abstraction and societal commentary, beauty is now a construct of personal taste and ""artistic"" sensibility, nothing to do with realism or skill. I don't know what to tell you ruski but I suspect you know full well what changed in the 20th century, but are trying to defend it cause you think it's fine.
Connor Moore
>reducing it to "fancy" frills shows you're an artistic retard
And thats exactly the point I wrote, but you didnt even try to read and think that Im opposing details. I was telling that first you need to study all the details to understand meaning, not just fapping on amount of them
Kayden Cox
No, the retarded part is that you think people prefer older art only cause of the amount of fancy details. That's you reducing art to fancy frills while accusing others, idiot
Ayden Ross
Lefties are just the useful idiots of an international rootless clique who want the whole world to be as international and rootless as they are.
So you did the same thing and reduced art to counting fancy frills/ inner story/ realism. Didnt you?
Composition, study of light and shapes are still cores of art as in was for centuries and seing in modern art only jappies sniffing their own farts is super naive
Matthew Rivera
>Why do you blame leftists for minimalistic architecture/art? I don't, I blame the jews.
Ian Hill
Ok then, whatever, i tried an answer. I still hate modern architecture and hope we can destroy this hellscape soon. Good luck peddling your "study of light and shape" soulless crap to some other poor idiot.
William Brown
>"study of light and shape" soulless crap
So what we have here: shapes and light are for abstract degeneracy But SOUL... Damn thats the real thing... And I am idiot here
You lack of logic and wisdom friend(
Leo Carter
they are two different accusations, of course classical art also had light and shape in them. anyway we can wrap things up yes friend, modern art is soulless crap and you have to search through miles of nonsense to find something good. Don't know why you're complaining though cause most of population seems to be fine with your new brand of art. >tell you why i hate modern art >you just don't understand it and lack wisdom
Colton Wright
How most of population think: 1) Minimalistic 2) Fancy Rokoko royal stuff
Both are wrong because 1) Something good in modern art requires perfect technique. Academical art is step by step mechanical work. Hyper realism isnt whole thing, thats why most artists lost job when photography became a thing.
Rembrandt was genious because of his skill in drawing shapes in shadows. Thats why he became famous. Raphael was a genious in drawing shapes and composition. And that brings SOWL in art
>Obviously, that's why i was quoting the OP and not talking to you. Architecture didn't turn to shit just cause of "economic reasons".
>tell you why i hate modern art
No, you are telling me that Im wrong. Im telling you that if you dont know at least little of how things really work - you arent better than a nigger selling a village for a bunch of chaplets - because you have nothing to be attracted to
Jayden Wood
2) I like it because its minimalistic like my iphone - marks an idiot too but I think you have 15034 threads already whinig about these people
Michael Jones
>and you have to search through miles of nonsense to find something good
You just can not imagine amount of shitty portraits made in old times/art univercities because no one scan them and you dont have to scroll them everyday lol. This comes with music too Different situation with architecture because building itself has economical and everyday life value anyway
