Is he overrated?

At the very least he wanted to expose and limit the Israeli nuke program, which is probably what got him killed. He also fought the mafia which was alright and compromised with Russia to prevent nuclear war.

Besides that he wasn't so great, he softly supported desegregation, mass immigration, and involvement in Vietnam even if his views weren't as horrible as LBJ's.

LBJ was 1000x worse on every issue than JFK, especially on Israel.

Other than Israel, these were are literally Kennedy's policies though.
library.cqpress.com/cqalmanac/document.php?id=cqal63-1317184

He supported killing all kikes so they shot him. His son and Trump going to make Israel Gone Again 2025. Putin for President

And not for nothing, but Kennedy was a Zionist too.
jfklibrary.org/archives/other-resources/john-f-kennedy-speeches/new-york-ny-19600826

and yet he never signed anything like the CRA while alive or openly sent thousands of Americans to die in Vietnam. LBJ apologists can never come up with an explanation for that.

Yes JFK had a softer support of those policies but at no point was he making radical LBJ style actions.
the second LBJ became president he quashed all opposition to Israel's nuclear program. LBJ fanatics lack all concept of subtlety. Yes they basically agreed on many issues, but LBJ's policies were 1000x worse due to how radical and drastic his actions were.

He was horrible. He was a niggerlover who supported civil rights and the Hart-Cellar act. He started the involvement in Vietnam. He was a deep state globalist puppet who surrounded himself with Jews and got 90% of the Jewish vote. He bungled the Bay of Pigs and put us in harms' way.

he was going to pass the immigration act of 1965 anyway, so yes

He supported killing all kikes, which is why he wrote a book for the Anti-Defamation League called "A Nation of Immigrants" and started the mass immigration foundation myth right?

>and yet he never signed anything like the CRA while alive
Yes, because it couldn't get through Congress. It didn't mean he didn't try. The only reason it ended up doing so was because Johnson used his death to stress the need to pass his policies.
jfklibrary.org/learn/education/teachers/curricular-resources/high-school-curricular-resources/strategies-for-support-jfk-and-the-civil-rights-act-of-1963
>or openly sent thousands of Americans to die in Vietnam
He sent nearly 20,000 to Vietnam.
>LBJ apologists can never come up with an explanation for that.
I don't like either LBJ or JFK. They're one in the same, just LBJ was a more effective politician.
>Yes JFK had a softer support of those policies
He was literally the first one to introduce them.
>but at no point was he making radical LBJ style actions.
Wrong, again, he just couldn't get them through Congress.
>the second LBJ became president he quashed all opposition to Israel's nuclear program
Which I already acknowledged. But that's by no means the worst aspect of LBJ's presidency. The worst is everything Kennedy also supported.

his brain was all over the place.

Yes. He got killed before he accomplished anything worthwhile. That means he lost. You can’t take on the CIA, backed by the international banking gods if you are too busy chasing pussy to protect yourself.

He didn't take on the CIA though. He used them to invade Cuba and overthrow Diem.