So was the Iranian Revolution good or Bad?

99.7% circumcision rate you stupid fucking semite

Attached: jewishlasersiniran.png (1277x866, 687.69K)

>semetic
No it's an aryan country you chink retard.

just as aryan as the indians are LMAO
hey why are persians so insecure about their nose???

Can I get a QRD?

Attached: 1648116494161.png (698x438, 140.89K)

can't even spell semitic right just shut the fuck up

so Americans are all semities then because the Jew hospitals circumcize Gentiles

Do you know what indo-european even means? Go back to china faggot.

circumcised mutts might as well be semites

yeah man indo-europeans LOVE their Islam

Dude stop conflating religion and ethnicity together.

Shitskin cope
Only Europeans are Aryans

Euro seethe so delicious

>Dude stop conflating religion and ethnicity together.
What do you have to say about the Jewish people then?

Ofcourse a kike would try to change the meaning of the word aryan.
In fact the word aryan was mostly used by the descendants of sintashta culture, who are the east indo-europeans.

How about ethnicity and phenotype retard
The cherrypicked pics that get posted here are a tiny minority, Israel has that too, neither are pure Aryan. You might as well call turks Aryans.

Attached: 46164424_303.jpg (700x394, 45.93K)

The Shah was a repressive LARP monarch but it was better than what followed which was a commie revolution that got strongarmed and taken over by religious extremists.

SO JUST REMEMBER MAGACHUDS YOU SHOULD JUST STFU UNTIL ANTIFA KNOCK THE WHOLE THING OVER, THEN STEP IN TO "HELP"

>east indo-europeans
lmao and I'm the one changing meanings? Indo-european is a retarded academic abstraction. European is a native of Europe who we know as a "white person". Any other definition are kike attempts at poisoning the well. There is no indo-european, indians aren't europeans, neither are iranians. At best there are mutted minorities in these places of people with fair features.

Noone said anything about european. We were talking about the word "aryan".
Khazars from central asia.
Unironically turks are mostly greek and anatolian, but still too mixed to be called anything.

Depends on your PoV. Like your pic related implies, however, the "the Shah westernised us" idea is a meme. He and his father's rule more than anything else in Iran they're seen as a period of selling out to western powers. Everything that could be sold was sold, often against the wishes of the broader people. The straw that broke the camel's back was the 2000-year Persian commemoration in which celebrities and magnates from all over the west were invited but the average Iranian person got fuck all and couldn't even get into the celebrations for his own country's history. For the Ayatollah and Mullahs in particular they never were really against the Shah in the first place but have always been pro-Iran above all. Since the Tobacco Protest against the British Irans priestly class has been seen as defenders of Iranian sovereignty, rights and impositions towards outsiders with no one else in the country having similar status and as such when the sparks of revolution began they were quickly propelled to the forefront of what was an anti-Shah movement yes but also and more importantly an anti-foreign, anti-Western movement for Iranian sovereignty against outside powers. It's one of the few revolutions (and the only one I can think off) where the issue wasn't "Bread" but was "Circuses" so to speak.

>Noone said anything about european. We were talking about the word "aryan".
Literal unironic pilpul. Everybody knows what aryan means and what are the connotations of aryan. It's European.
Any attempt to put Europeans in the same category as subhumans (indians, iranians, kikes) is just anti european intellectualism. Your definitions are not relevant to reality.
>Khazars from central asia.
Also lmao. Literal brown people are aryan but people who sometimes have all european features, bright eyes, blonde hair are.. asians.

LOL, Sintashta culture was very close to Khazaria you know. People say modern jews have slavic roots where the fuck do you think they came from? Eastern Europe.

>Indo-european is a retarded academic abstraction

No, it's a very real people who are the ancestors of many ethnic groups, including but not limited to pre-arabic persians and most europeans.
So shut your nose and scram to another thread.

Aryans originally are from ukraine and south russia, then spread west to europe AND east to central asia. It's all literal facts. Tadjiks and pashtuns are closer genetically to original aryans than french are, for example.

>Everybody knows what aryan means
Most people think Aryan = blonde blue eyed scandi, thanks to your war propaganda, moshe.

Europeans happen to have a lot of Aryan admixture, but it's not limited to Europeans.
Tocharians were Aryan descendants, and their geographical region is modern day China.
Aryans spread far and wide.

>pre-arabic persians
Ah yes, the Zoroastrian persians, the religion that inspired Judaism.

Apparently this idiot has no concept of time or migrations. Khazars were turks who came from altai mountains, and after most aryans migrated to europe during the great migrations the khazar turks moved west and settled in north caucasus.
After khazaria was defeated by kievan rus and khazar jews dispersed by the incoming mongol invasions, they started moving around in europe starting from east europe.
How's that for a history lesson?

Partly, likely, yes. Are you trying to imply something?