Monarchy just.. worked

>worked for pretty the beginning of the middle ages (~400 after christ) until the 1910s
>Instead of Leaders being a job (like todays polititians), they were raised to be the ultimate king/queen. Their entire life they were prepared to server their kingdom
>No corruption, as they served the people, their land and god
>strong tie to religion
>Full of honor and dignity, not afraid to defend their reign with their life


You ever wondered why the only argument agains monarchy is always
>NOOO, YOU CANNOT VOTE, NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!
?

Its because monarchy is just the ultimate way to lead a country. No one need the barely literate population shitting politics full with their uninformed, retarded opinion on how giving niggers state mandated pitbulls is a good idea. With monarchy you have a few people, specially trained to serve their role, making meaningfull and actually logical decisions.

What logical and good decisions did the EU make? Or the USA? England?

Attached: Kaiser Franz.jpg (2161x3393, 1.88M)

>NOOO, YOU CANNOT VOTE, NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!
imagine thinking that voting changes anything
even if the people vote against (((them))), the kikes in the government will still do as they please for their personal gain

If you pay attention to the history of most nations, you will see that the king struggled endlessly against the nobles, who would exploit the lower classes, with the masses seeing the king as the ultimate defender of their rights.
The absolute state of liberals and parliamentarians the Europe over was the butthurt over lack of freedom to oppress the lower classes, and even then they had an absurd amount of power.
If you notice something, things like mass conscription, universal income taxes and summary tirals are all features of post-revolution Europe, with monarchies being more respectful of people's traditions than any other system.
Plutocrats are the worst enemy of the common man.

There were certainly things that worked about it but they were all undone by banking. If a monarch didn't participate in debt, he would be at the mercy of those that did borrow to fund wars against them. This is how England became the bitch of the house of Rothschild.

There has never been a government that has "served the people".

I don't think that any monarchy really gave away the reins of power
they probably pick the candidates to fool the populace
I wouldn't allow the peasants to take away My throne and country

Death to kikes

Attached: praise.jpg (1122x1138, 90.01K)

Monarchy did not work. Last time Europe was dominated by monarchies WWI happened.

Attached: org_pylj299.jpg (1500x2000, 249.85K)

based thread

Attached: monarchism.jpg (941x1024, 113.73K)

Attached: monarch war.jpg (987x1217, 95.41K)

:(

>thinking wars are bad

Attached: You heard him.jpg (720x594, 59.11K)

Monarchy is based because if you don't like it you rebel. Democracy is fucked because they just tell you to vote and give the illusion of choice.

Jesus, and they say mutt education is bad. You never read a history book in your life, did you?

It worked because the ruling class and the people were the same ethnically and religiously. This connection between the classes is necessary for a prosperous, lasting, society.

Attached: 1E01ABE0-F396-47BD-9FAB-2F5D41116893.jpg (472x531, 99.78K)

My only real argument against Monarchism - at least in the absolutist sense - is that you don't know what the Faggot King/Queen is gonna do. Realistically The Military is a better entity to be leading The Country (because it actually DOES have a decent grasp on how Authority Works and how to Govern) - The Aristocracy would be better off giving a "Human Face" to it all.

WELL WWI happened due to the "complex web of alliances" between Monarchical States and Secular/Republican Ones. It all just wasn't realistically sustainable for peace (but even then, who gives a shit about peace?).

Baszódj meg Hansi

>It worked because the ruling class and the people were the same ethnically and religiously.
That's consistently untrue though. People would bring in foreign kings all the time

That lord is fucking that peasant girl

giving away power to some guy for no reason and leaving yourself with absolutely zero political or legal recourse against him is the most cucked ruling system i can think of.
if you're a peasant born in 1300s france thats bad luck.
if you *willingly*, actively and consciously, give away all your rights and freedoms to some dude you'll never meet and doesnt give a shit about you, you're a cuck.
>voting doesnt work its the same thing. its always the same group of 300 people making all the choices regardless of what you vote or dont vote
so its the same thing as
>With monarchy you have a few people, specially trained to serve their role, making meaningfull and actually logical decisions
You have an issue with the current political climate, the ruling superpower, and the doctrines they enforce, not with the way of ruling.
You're always going to be ruled by people that dont care about you. Choosing to have even less power is advanced cuckery, might aswell sell yourself to somali slavers.