So you don't think a movement such as I propose would help the situation. Just because it doesn't *directly* attack Jews?
I think there would be more room for people to discuss important topics if everyone felt that they were entitled to pride in their race. I think that whichever group or group of groups who are pushing this stuff in the West (they obviously are, all of this "progress" is very much a set of astroturfed, top-down, forced changes, supported by propaganda on all sides), they do not want us to set aside the racial divide enough to work together on our common problems. This also removes so much of the ammo the far left uses, as it would be incredible hard, ridiculous really, to call someone in this movement racist.
But the main point is normalizing pride in one's race, one's people, one's heritage, for all people including Europeans. With that foot in the door, as I said, Europeans gain the ability to push back that much more against the stuff that is being pushed pretty much only on their countries (the West).
And regarding Jews, yeah, a lot of them seem to be involved in really shady stuff, objectively, and they definitely are overrepresented in academia, media, the financial sector, even in politics in many Western countries - it's not in debate, we have the statistics to show it (mostly, maybe places like France don't because they banned publishing racial statistics). The question is whether it is a consequence of higher IQ, verbal and otherwise, although the studies showing this have been criticized (I think like China for choosing only university level test takers), or if it is something else, like nepotism, deliberate subversion, or some combination of these.
I don't think you could prove which it is, because it would probably be different for every Jew. I mean, loxism is real, it does exist, and their are documented cases of subversion in modern and historical time. But I think a lot of it might just be nepotism, too