The second amendment was never intended to mean unrestricted access to weapons of war
The second amendment was never intended to mean unrestricted access to weapons of war
Other urls found in this thread:
False.
It was intendeded to allow parallel/equal force to a tyrannical government, so you should be able to have predator drones and tanks
this
how does a foreigner have a better understanding then the mouth breathers here?
define weapons of war. your internet modem is todays weapon of war hombre.
It kinda was though.
You do not deserve access to air
it was never unrestricted you fucking retard
what part of "shall not be infringed" don't you understand?
Your brain was meant to think, not to repeat slogans that you heard from a video screen.
Have you noticed only leftist faggots use pepe now, it's actually kinda cringe to see them try to imitate us but fail in everyway at it.
the fed was not suppose to let the federal reserve exist too so what do we do now
The second amendment was intended to mean unrestricted access to weapons of war
...
the intention of the second amendment is the organization of private militias. You might as well say that they legalized private military organizations
Because they are the manifestation of a world without guns. Instead of revolution and maiming politicians you get a police state that deports you and stomps on your balls every second it can. The parlimentary system is a cancer upon this world.
youtube.com
Shotgun and homemade explosives.
Before you even begin to think about banning guns secure the border.
>fact
Lie
Kys
It meant nukes if you can get your hands on one you faggot. SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED.
>unrestricted access to weapons of war
yea no shit nigger thats why I cant buy a minigun or an A-10 warhog
dumb nigger faggot you should kys
You could own cannons and battleships back then kek
It was meant so that the populace could overthrow the government so yes it entails weapons of war.
I keep hearing you guys aren’t supposed to have a standing army. So technically, all weapons should be in the hands of civilians only.
Because the foreigner here is being honest.
OP is not.
false.
i want my privateering ship with 20 cannons.
now fuck off.
Shut up, kike
You have these weapons in Israel
Yes it was.
>the Aussie gets it better than the American
what part of "well-regulated' don't you understand?
Then why doesn't it include limits?
>honorary
All those same weapons that you faggots are shilling for sending to Ukraine with our hard earned labor? Those weapons are ours. You can suck my dick you commie faggots. We are going to hang you by your necks. The day is coming soon.
Then why does it merely state “right to bear arms” with no further explicatives narrowing and otherwise limiting those may consist of, faggot?
OP is a faggot AND a communist
>The second amendment was never intended to mean unrestricted access to weapons of war
This is completely right. The NRA have created a retarded misinterpretation of this amendment.
Additionally, the word "bear" is a noun and not a verb. If it were meant to be a verb, it would have been a better and more suitable word choice, like "carry."
Hopefully Biden will implement the true interpretation of this important legal document.
Self-regulated; considering this is a contract between the government and The People of rights the government is expressly forbidden to step on, no Neanderthal would mandate that a people’s militia be regulated by the government
Yes it does sis. Stop being a pussy sis.
id report you for breaking the law, which you are, but i get banned for doing so.
Arms is short for armament
Arnament means military weapons/equipment
Second is very clear, pencil neck
Personal nukes senpai. Freedom guaranteed. It is the only way none of this pussy footing around with guns
Don’t care. You’re never taking my guns. I’m going to buy another rifle just because of this post.
Wrong, retard. The sole purpose of the second amendment is to ensure the people are adequately armed to keep from getting steamrolled by a tyrannical government. Learn your shit or sit in ignorance.
>Arms is short for armament
No, it's not. It's a literal word that refers to appendages that are attached organically to the body. It can be used in figurative ways, but the real, true, literal meaning of arms is the things that your hands are attached to.