Well Any Forums, you guys have finally begun killing the white race

>Every white woman I know is now terrified of the idea of getting pregnant because they know if something goes wrong they’re fucked.
Good, the removal of whores is a positive.

>Wisconsin is now taking a “wait and see” approach which will result in removal only after serious complications have already begun.
That doesn't sound like they count a laparoscopic surgery as an abortion. Furthermore, pro-life groups are lobbying to change the law you are citing.

So that's a swing and a miss. Try again.

Attached: wisconsin.png (669x278, 71.56K)

God bless America

That’s not a human being tweeting that.

> That doesn't sound like they count a laparoscopic surgery as an abortion
The law in Wisconsin was written in the 1800’s and holds that literally any medical procedure which threatens the life of the fetus is illegal unless immediately medically necessary. It isn’t just about abortion specifically. This also was covered by Roe.

Based

K. So it's still allowed. Try again.

Dirt poor sewing women in 1800s England living in smog covered shitholes managed to pop out 5 kids

No it isn’t. It’s only allowed after complications have already presented themselves. As in, after the woman is already in grave danger of death immediately. The doctors here are literally being told by the hospital lawyers not to do anything about it unless the woman is literally about to die. Often times the procedure at that point is too late and will result in death. Do you understand?

>It’s only allowed
So it's allowed. Try again.

3 of those kids died and they only stopped at 5 because the mother died in childbirth.

Close legs

L I T E R A L L Y
S H A K I N G
R I G H T
N O W
!
bitchute.com/video/ku1v3Uv2mmkW/

I think you’re being intentionally obtuse if you don’t understand how this is an issue.

Yes, women will now refuse to have sex with their husbands because of this, you’re right

Not at all. I asked you to list a state where it was not allowed. You listed Wisconsin, where, by your own admission, it is in fact allowed.

Try again.

theres like 6 million states that allow abortion retard move to one that aligns with your values

It’s not being allowed in a sensible timeframe. There is a definitive difference between allowing the procedure when it has a low likelihood of mortality and only allowing it when it has a much higher likelihood of mortality. Your insistence to only think in black and white terms about this is telling of autism

Yes, thank god indeed.

No source. Lies

I don't care. That's not what I asked for. You can say, "It's not good enough," but that is irrelevant to what I was demanding. Wisconsin doesn't treat it as though its an abortion. It's still allowed under certain circumstances.

So try again. List a single state that treats "terminating an ectopic pregnancy via laparoscopic surgeries" as "abortion."

Just one.

>roastie getting toasty
Everyone who gives a shit about this in wisconsin, like you do, I don't want in my fucking state anyway.
If you don't like it, fuck off and get out.