Is this porn?

is this porn?

Attached: Sandro_Botticelli_-_La_nascita_di_Venere_-_Google_Art_Project_-_edited.jpg (1200x754, 336.4K)

Attached: 1656865219474.jpg (920x1294, 222.97K)

pretty sure that picture is good for me
what was your question?

no, that's lucifer

why did that painting become so famous when this one is so much better
venus' shoulder looks dislocated ffs

Attached: Primavera-Botticelli-analisi.jpg (1587x1057, 968.79K)

No. Porn is anything created with the intent of provoking lust. This isn't created with the intention of provoking lust as far as I know and it isn't explicitly depicting the sexual act.

I still think it is degenerate art though. Greeks were degenerates which is why they had so many naked statues and boy sex slaves. Enlightenment art of course had to emulate that shit. So called "western" heathen values are the root of Christendom's problems. When those values were revived in the enlightenment they were pushed far into the extreme of anything those pagans would have known as a reaction against Christianity.

not it isnt abdullah now fuck off

i don't quite understand how nude paintings are not porngraphic presumably but nude photos are, even where the subject isn't masturbating or having sex with someone else

Attached: 0w6orpf98a991.png (1920x1080, 990.47K)

you forgot the tiddie factor luigi

Attached: 1fr6oflvd8991.jpg (4032x3024, 779.84K)

ok so if a girl uploads a nude selfie or a guy photographs her nude and she isn't masturbating in the pic or having sex with someone else is that pic porn or not?

Attached: 1vq7xpr7za991.jpg (1000x750, 266.22K)

kike detected, we are founded on the greeks and their wisdom, not the impudent roman aristocracy or the jews they trained to be their lapdog heralds

Nah, porn is meant to be titillating. This is just beautiful

Venus, known as Aphrodite among the Greeks, got her greek name because she came from the sea. It means something along the lines of foam-born.
Also no. It it not meant to titilate.

The intent of the art is what defines it.
Porn is created with the intention of riling your senses; its a dopamine rush by design.
If you get the same dopamine rush looking at a classical painting that has nudity, your brain chemistry is fucked

Despite how many long dead European's probably wanked to it, no. This is art.

what about picrel? is it porn?

Attached: XJEgo.jpg (1920x1080, 226.82K)

and what if you don't know the intent of the art if the artist is dead?

Attached: 3jgby1jp3a991.jpg (862x517, 58.98K)

venus = morning star = lucifer
don't fap to satan anons

Attached: morn.jpg (258x225, 16.24K)

no. are you literally retarded?

I'ld need to know more. Just that frame? I'ld say no. But what is it from is the real question? This doesn't exist on it's own like the painting. There are too many unknowns.

borderline
cope philosofag. I spit on your fag wisdom and cosmopolitan materialist shitty "wisdom."

it's from a movie called "baron munchausen" and it's the only nudity in the film so it's not a porn film

Attached: 3js6n7ycqb991.jpg (435x580, 37.74K)

true

POPPA

The japs have vastly improved upon the original Venus design.

Attached: venus character.png (1280x1050, 1.8M)

in my translation of the aeneid they use poppe for the stern of the ship and i kept forgetting and thinking they meant tiddies lol

Attached: 4g810jw4fb991.png (458x188, 18.67K)

fuck you I was 2 weeks no fap

I don't know the movie, but probably not. Intent is hard to understand, modern depictions of nudity are almost always made with the intent to give you a dopamine hit.

It's difficult user. You decide what the point of the scene was. If you can say with confidence it isn't meant to get you arroused, then it isn't.