I want to actually become more educated and have some talking points when people bring up abortion, all the libtards are screeching about it and I know arguing won't change anything, but I at least want to be able to hold my own in a debate. I find it funny with the whole my body my choice argument suddenly doesn't apply to experimental vaccines not even past stage III clinical trials
I want to actually become more educated and have some talking points when people bring up abortion...
Other urls found in this thread:
centerformedicalprogress.org
bloodpassover.com
twitter.com
The only points you need.
The majority are non-medical and non-legal (Meaning not from rape)
Most obvious taking point is, it's not her body anymore, right when the sperm fuses with the egg, creating something with different DNA from HER.
When they start crying about women's rights, tell them NO society on earth ever gave their women the right to be whores without consequences and live.
here's a great starting point
centerformedicalprogress.org
bloodpassover.com
The majority of people of childbearing age are nonwhite. Conservatives could have made a positive impact by ending abortion decades ago, but doing it at this point will just further accelerate White replacement.
Blessed is the man that walketh not in the counsel of the ungodly, nor standeth in the way of sinners, nor sitteth in the seat of the scornful.
>Memeflaggot explains how the window of oppurtunity has closed on white people not realizing at this current point in history there are more white people than ever.
But please continue with your demoralization pills.
the majority of the states that will keep abortion legal is where the majority of shitskins live.
the states that will ban it are the more white states.
also banning abortion is objectively a net gain for global white demographics. your logic only even works in context of america's demographics, which are fucked beyond repair from immigration anyways.
think don't listen to ecelebs they're all coke heads and closet fags irl.
>sacrificing white babies to molech and harvesting their brain tissues will help the white birthrate because
*shuffles hat pulls card*
>they also do it to american niggers
as if there isn't a zillion ones in africa to send over on the banana boat
Why do zoomies love to do the glowing eye thing in pictures for? It was a cringey fad 5 years ago that never seemed to go away.
As soon as the commies and grifters started doing that shit, I knew it was some cancerous trend that wouldn't go away anytime soon, but seriously now I see anyone post this shit I immidiately know to disengage with them because they are under the age of 25.
>I..I'TS FROM ANIME
Fuck yourself, weeblet. Also you will never be a woman.
>the majority of the states that will keep abortion legal is where the majority of shitskins live
This isn’t even remotely true. I can’t tell if you’re actually this retarded or just disingenuous.
Read the first 10 amendments to the constitution.
Then use the Socratic method on dumb fucks.
>what was the ruling of roe v wade
>>it was about legalizing abortion
>have you read the decision in roe v wade?
>>n-no
>the key decision in roe v wade was that the penumbra of a shadow of a right was found in the 4th amendment, the right to privacy, that guarantees a woman's right to an abortion
Etc
Get them to understand the 10th and why making up rights out of other rights is bad.
Also explain what a constitutional convention is and explain that if they want to make up a right and enshrine it there is a process.
Why did Nazis burn pro-lgbt literature and scholarship, in light of the OP image?
you won't even post with your real flag because it's probably israel lmbo. wonder who's behind this post :^)
yes explain to me how sacrificing white babies to moloch saves the white race, i'm all ears right now!
hey what about all the other points i made? we're going to casually gloss over that aborting white children in america is objectively a net negative for the global white population count and birth rate?
Abortion should be illegal, but not for the reason they say it should
Let me set up a similar situation:
If the government mandated tomorrow that all parents of children are forced to give up one of their kidneys in the event of the child requiring one to survive, would you support it?
The surgery to remove the kidney is about the same likelihood of death as is having a child
Both this and forced pregnancy laws are identical in that they require the individual to take on a non-zero chance of death to save another life
That is the problem with abortion
Not whatever the fuck the supreme court argued for decades
It's a bodily integrity issue, unironically my body my choice
Unfortunately the retards who support abortion also support mandatory vaccinations
>they come in here to unironically defend weimar child prostitution and dick chopping surgeries
abortion should be legal and also mandatory but only for niggers and jews
sterilize jewish women on assembly lines with radiation sort of like they used to do to ethiopians
life begins at conception
that's a well-established scientific and embryological fact
at the point a sperm fuses with an egg cell and a new human zygote forms, it's a single-celled human organism, a new and individual human being with its own genetic code
thus this represents an individual human body which is not part of the woman's body, only inside it
in other words, if you take "my body, my choice" to its ultimate conclusion, then they have no right whatsoever to murder this new human life residing inside of them, since that would be to make a choice regarding the body of someone else
Women should be allowed to have the umbilical cord disconnected from her uterus at any time. I don't get why Any Forums hates leeching mooching niggers and thinks child welfare is an outrage but demands a woman not be allowed to remove the umbilical cord leeching her nutrients. What's the difference between cutting the cord at six weeks vs 9 months (since doctors eventually always cut the cord after birth).
>the fetus will die without it
So do born children when they have no food or shelter but Any Forums doesn't support welfare for them so why is the fetus different? That's what I want to know. I just want consistency on this matter. If you're completely anti abortion than at least be ready to take on the consequences of those births instead of being content to see them starve in poverty.
That's a shitty mindset. Every one of us will censor the communist kikes the second we take power. All faggotry homo shit will be banned. All degenerate shit banned. All talks about neutrality and defeatist anti-national/anti-White rhetoric is banned. It's correct to do this. The OP image precludes the possibility that the censorship is needed and correct action. Leftists actually believe they are correct is the problem. Rape correction from a pack of niggers from the Gibson Protocol is needed.
ignore bots, read passovers of blood bloodpassover.com
>the chief rabbi of rome's son sets out to definitively prove once and for all that jews didn't murder and sacrifice christian children throughout most of european history.
>begins investigating it and finds not only are the allegations of jews rock solid and some of the best documented pieces of history that exist, they also extend outside of europe to cultures whites barely had contact with.
>ariel toaff is one of the 0.00001% of jews with a soul inside
>writes passovers of blood instead, probably the best history of jewish ritual child sacrifice in europe
...
I support abortion, but not mandatory vaccination.
that's one of the dumbest arguments imaginable, because the child would not be in that situation in the first place if it weren't for you, so not providing it with what it needs in order not to die is no different from starving a child that has already been born to death
any action you take in order to deprive it from the nutrients it needs to grow and live at that point is murder
>that's one of the dumbest arguments imaginable, because the child would not be in that situation in the first place if it weren't for you
>What is rape
And are you prepared to pay more taxes to make sure children don't starve, or do you not care once they're born.
life begins at conception, except jews who are subhumans and should be put to death.
Off topic but does anyone have more images like OP?
Pic related is another one I saved earlier
rape is irrelevant, because the child would still not be in that situation in the first place if it weren't for you and your body, so you still have to provide the child with the nutrients it needs, anything else is homicide by starvation, which is legally murder
taxation has nothing to do with this, you are not responsible for children you did not conceive, only for the children you conceive, which you are responsible for for life
..another one
There is literally nothing wrong with removing a growth from a woman that doesn't even have a brain.
"becoming more educated" in regards to abortion is a cope in lieu of not having string moral convictions about the value of human life. If you believe it's wrong to end human life in the womb, you shouldn't be concerning yourself with mental gymnastics of any sort.
there absolutely is
it's not a "growth", that's you trying to make up euphemism to avoid dealing with the facts of reality, namely that it's an individual human being from the moment of conception
even as a single-celled organism, a human zygote is an individual human life
removing it or starving it is murder
By growth, you mean a human life though, don't you user.
>so you still have to provide the child with the nutrients it needs
No, I did not consent for another person to take residence in my body. If a methhead tries to squat in my house, I don't care if they're my sister, I'm kicking them out. Same for a zygote.
fuck i just realized i meant to say "abortion should be legal" in the first line
Yes you did consent to another person to take residence in your body. You made the fucking pact when you decided to have sexual intercourse without taking the necessary precautions, you fucking smooth-brained cunt of a person.