I think everything got bamboozled..
>Originally worked as a spy
>Magically comes to power
>Magically builds a huge army from a country whose economy was destroyed
>Wages a war where millions of white Europeans die
>Makes so many mistakes, it's almost like he didn't care about winning
>Disappears after the war
>No body or real evidence he died
Something smells mighty fishy here folks.. Think this was a Russia/Ukraine type scenario back then.. The original Zelenskyy.
Everyone* not everything
Did your hebrew to english translator fuck up, rabbi?
The holocaust was the narrative used to justify the destruction of Germany by the allies, the demonization of right wing politics and the sanctification of jews. It has nothing to do with concentration camps or that some jews died in the war. As the central piece in the post-WW2 new world order, it was instrumental in the creation of the of left's new religion where whiteness became the original sin, Hitler the Devil, right-wing politics demonic, racism the greatest evil, jews the gods and the destruction of Western culture the ultimate redemption.
It was a very clever way to enslave an entire group of people without them even noticing.
Some jews died in WW2. Some jews (rightfully, just like US Japanese were) were held in camps in WW2. Some jews starved in camps in WW2. Jews were not gassed by the millions. There were no 'extermination camps'. There was no systematic effort to exterminate all jews by the Germans. There was no 6 gorillion. Jews in camps had typhus and camps were de-loused with Zyklon B just like people, ships, and warehouses were all over the world.
The Germans were blockaded and starving. Therefore their prisoners starved as well. The combination of typhus and starvation due to the blockade and 24/7 nationwide bombings cutting supply lines and crippling the nation resulted in a lot of prisoners dying. In order to decrease the rate of typhus infection the bodies of the dead were burned, just as the allies did when they captured the camps. The concentration camps and deaths of some jews (likely around 300,000 maximum) was real. The 'holocaust' is an event GREATLY exaggerated in order to increase jew political power and their ability to manipulate others to their benefit post-WW2. Thus, it should be labeled the 'holohoax'.
The absolute must-know Weimar, WW2 and holohoax redpills:
archive.4plebs.org
archive.4plebs.org
he was just legit retarded
so sure a puppet, of many different groups, though he was never aware of it
What kind of training did he receive when he was living in Liverpool in the early 1910s?
His actions did lead to the capitulation of the birthplace of christ and the creation of Isreal
Good question..
>Was Hitler a puppet the whole time??
who cares?
why you keep looking for people to do your thinking for you?
IS it really THAT hard to think for yourself, that you would outsource that VITAL task to others?
what are you talking about pal
> The holocaust was the narrative used to justify the destruction of Germany by the allies
All the holocaust and death camp shit didn’t even come out until the final weeks of the war.
Yeap. Vegans are retarded.
>why you keep looking for people to do your thinking for you?
What in the hell are you talking about bub
The world is a stage filled with actors. Welcome to Hell.
so he was just another pawn in the game?
Yes.
Magaldi LIVES.
Yes, user. The entirety of post rome has just been (((them))) playing good jew bad jew. It's just another game. If Britain was part of it, and the founding fathers of the US were masons, what makes you think Hitler is any different? They have played the "bad guy" before. They have also played the "misunderstood hero" before.
Makes sense...this is like 5d chess
Hard to wrap your head around
No. He served bravely in WW1, retard.
Also, they will play both sides in any civil war as well. The Q, new age great awakening, all that stuff, they are behind it. We can guess for years at their motives, but nobody REALLY knows. We know the stereotypical "haha kill the goyim yes I am the chosen one" take, and that's perfectly valid, but it's more than just (((them))), there are others. They like to direct toward one group to another, but in truth it's all of them. Who really knows why they do it, there are some guesses steeped in heavy occultism, but that could just as easily be yet another fake out.
For example, the "muh reality is loosh farm" theory on /x/, purported often by Icke first. Icke is part of the ageless wisdom movement, which is connected to the United Nations. Can we really trust that? No. Who knows what the deepest innermost reason is. Nothing wrong with putting heads together though.
So? What the hell does that mean? Churchill fought in WW1 as well, retard.
Just a midwit who didn't do his research, pay him no mind.
Ultimately what you need to take from what I'm trying to tell you is this, and I'm sorry if it's uncomfortable.
You cannot win.
There is no escaping the ride.
Nobody will ever revolt truly.
Nothing will stop them, ever.
You can shoot as much as you want, but you'll never hit an organ.
The Bible was right when it said it was ultimately a spiritual war of some kind, you can't beat them with your fists. You can only ensure that they don't get into your mind.
Try not to get paranoid, but it's all a game. Whatever they have planned for the past several thousand years is finally coming to fruition, I have some guesses but ultimately nobody knows how it's going down, the layers are too great.
Sorry, I wish it was nicer.
>
Short Answer: Yes.
Evidence:
Most historians are perplexed that Hitler and Mussolini declared war on america, completely unnecessarily.
This is because the NatSoc regime in Germany was funded Anglo-American industrialists to destroy the Soviet Union.
When the Germans failed to take Moscow and Lenningrad by Winter, they knew the 'whole rotten structure' wouldn't collapse by kicking the door in.
Declaring war on America was the global industrial banking elite hedging their bets. By allowing america time and opportunity to sieze western europe this stopped the Soviets from conquering all of Europe as they may well have done.
Before you say, why would Jews fund nazis?
The ideology does not matter to free masons or bankers, only money. They'll support anyone who's the most violent sect of the socially acceptable political boundaries of a country at a given point in time to pursue their own ends.
That's why they funded Antifa anarchists in America because they're the most violent of the socially political spectrum there, and they fund azovite nazis in the Ukraine and the original nazis in Germany for the same reason.
OP is based and apparently intelligent for asking this question.
We don't have enough information. I'm sure it's documented in some secret archive, unfortunately we don't have it. But yes, some people think that. And some also think he's a puppet who cut his own strings.
Difference being one tried to establish peace while the other didn't: Churchill is Zionist trash.
Correct, sidenote, don't forget that Hitler (AND America) were both influenced by theosophical groups, and many of those in the german military inevitably got integrated into space programs and other things. Both sides fight for the same thing, some kind of evolution.
Magaldi claimed the masons acted as frontmen for the (((visionaries))) by having two groups that differed slightly ideologically, and thus nearly every event in modern history is just puppets fighting other puppets, despite having the same goals.
I think a good example of this for the average man, is how the Democratic and Republican parties in the US support the exact same things. You could also look at the relation to Japan's markets and the endless fighting of the National Diet, they'll claim traditionalism and purity all they want but it will always be porn vending machines and rape crime bribes.
The fact that France and the western european countries were run by Freemasons, is explicable was to the how and why their armies were intentionally organised not to attack Germany while its back was turned fighting the Polish during the 'Phony War' period, because they were never supposed to fight or win
>D-D-DIFFERENCE BEING, MY SIDE SAID IT WOULD RESTORE ULTIMATE PEACE, WHILE THE OTHER SIDE SAID IT WOULD RESTORE ULTIMATE PEACE!
>a-a-a-aand... RACISM! HAIL THE WHITE MAN'S CENTURY!
Good point Chad,
often these groups create competing agencies within themselves to achieve the same, end. I hadn't considered that the broader organisation would be doing the same thing.
Wow ... an intelligent person on Any Forums ?? Color me surprised.
What about the bible? Jesus? You say hyou have some guesses, I would love to hear it.
Oh, and another point! Theosophy reached russia in the form of Agni Yoga, which (although persecuted-ish by Russia now, still shilled the same ideology. Today, Agni Yoga is pro-transhumanism. Check out Victor Skumin.)
Thank you for the reply my friend..
It definitely doesn't make much sense... Hitlers entire rise seems fabricated.. Reminds me so much of Zelensky
Can you translate that from tranny to readable English? Hitler was a war hero and loved Germany. You are a freak and hater. Difference being you are a failure and he wasn't.
>Difference being you are a failure and he wasn't.
The guy lost WW2 and allegedly committed suicide. genius.
Jesus might've actually been just what he said he was, there's a lot of stuff that's nigh undeniable here and there.
However, here's the thing, the Church was going to become the monster that exists currently (which was also predicted.). Jesus is NOT God, when you realize this the entirety of Christianity is changed forever. When you realize that the apostolic fathers didn't even believe in the trinity, and that Athanasius was an angry young pagan who basically assaulted an old man for being logical (Arius), it starts to make sense
I don't trust gnosticism because they shill it all the time, but I'm still doing research. For all I know, what I see could be proven topsy turvy.
I got a book on it though, which proves the trinity thing in the very least. Here
google.com
One person I like, although he has some absolute schizo takes, is David Livingstone. ordoabchao.ca he has a lot of references, so it's good if you want to research on your own. He sources everything he claims.