The next phase will be depopulation of low population density areas via various policy initiatives and agendas.Urbanized integration will continue and living in restricted areas will become no longer be authorized.
Megacity cluster incubation proceeding rapidly
Jacob Perez
Other urls found in this thread:
Dominic Sanchez
What will the culture of these cities be like?
Sebastian Kelly
Sadness.
Adrian Ross
Someone has reading too much Judge Dread.
Bentley Torres
>in 2.5 years the population will be between 7 and 63 million
talk about hedging bets
Ryder Roberts
Globohomo culture, I'd guess.Liberal world order kinda thing.
Jack Johnson
>talk about hedging bets
things are very much in flux, but the plan has contingencies and various routes to completion
Julian Bailey
Rural areas could only happen due to energy surpluses and subsidized infrastructure. Traditionally this was canals, then it was railroads, then freeways. Because chuds oppose transit subsidies, when the major industries that underpin these rural areas dies there's no other alternative. Especially on the west coast, as the water runs out rural areas will have to pay for imported water or move to the cities. Most will choose the latter. In the midwest, agriculture will fully automate and fully consolidate eliminating almost all rural jobs. The ones that remain will require college degrees.
Though if you look at your map, development patterns east of the Mississippi are normal and reflect pre-highway urbanization schemes, owning to the region's (comparably) larger use of transit and extensive railroad development. Chicago and the Great Lakes area will continue operating normally because it'll just sprawl out along the existing railroads. Michegan is front and center for this, with their new train projects aimed at taking jobs from Chicago. It's likely to work. The northeast will develop similarly but will have to build much taller buildings and expand railroads accordingly - essentially what Biden proposed earlier this year for new services to Reading, Allentown and Scranton.
Nicholas Carter
A culture of ashes and men dumb enough to not know but unwise enough to not be free anyways.
Ian Rodriguez
>the plan
>destroy the white man, creator of civilizations
>no goal
>dies
Yeap. Clown World plan, indeed.
Justin Wright
where is that map from? reminds me of the agenda 21 map.
imho in aus (and prob california) they will do it via insurance... flood and bushfires.
If you live near forrest insurers wont touch you, if you live near a flood zone insurers wont touch you.
Bank requires insurance for a mortgage. thus nobody will buy your house from you.
So you either live in your uninsurable house or take the gov “climate change relocation” gibs and fuck off to the city. chinese do it more bluntly but the effect is the same. Pic related.. they also said the vax was voluntary in australia..
Besides onces everyone else takes the offer and nobody new moves in, and the shops move away and the infrastructure stops being maintained, you will move anyway. sure there will be some hold outs. But they will die a natural death soon enough.
Hudson Campbell
Yes, the Interstate Highway System was an early trend factor in regards to small town America and their dying on the vine. So many factors, take Kansas as an example.
Juan Powell
The birth rate is negative, there is only one way to travel between cities (interstate). None of those cities in the highlighted areas are connected to each other in such a way for it to operate as a real mega-region. Its simply too far apart, not easily connected and has no real modern mass cargo/transit networks.
Samuel Powell
>where is that map from? reminds me of the agenda 21 map.
Spot on, America 2050 site from a few years ago.
Joshua Morales
total shit
next question?
Samuel Sullivan
I live in the Green Region. It sucks.
Thomas Carter
Hunger Games? Judge Dredd?
Ryder Russell
>look, we have a megacity cooking
You’re late
Samuel Ramirez
Culture?
Zachary Hernandez
Where do schizos get this. Do you just make it up as you go?
Jackson Thomas
It's still debatable if freeways helped or harmed. Certainly in areas where existing US highways were replaced by freeways (Route 66 vs Interstate 40, Route 50 vs Interstate 80) the freeways decimated local towns, but cities that could get a freeway connection grew, some into exurbs and suburbs such as in California's Central Valley. 50 years ago, nobody would have believed that genteel european tech workers would want to move to Merced or Lodi but here we are. Same for Chicagoland, where the freeways compete directly against rail and the two can sometimes be interchangable.
Either way, the financial support for these systems are draining. As big urban states transition to EVs, gas tax revenues will reduce causing a freeway financing crisis. Then it's either a VMT tax or tolls. Even as transit is rebuilt, due to American financial austerity it's improbable that widespread deployment will happen outside of urban zones ie Illinois because the rural states are full of tax protesters who don't want to pay for it. The other issue are railroad monopolies. With only 6 major railroads now, plausibly 5 by 2050, most American markets will only have 1 railroad and only 1 usable train track. While this frees up space for new transit, most states will not take advantage of that. Inevitably, this reduces industrial development outside of the remaining RR corridors which reduces the population long term. Death occurs when the railroad is ripped up. This process already began a century ago, and crested sometime in the 1980s which was how Amtrak survived.
Christopher Adams
>Hunger Games? Judge Dredd?
We have been prepped/pre-conditioned for years.
Henry Phillips
Those are numbers for individual regions.
They're talking about the California portion being 63 million and the Arizona region being 7 million.