Eco-friendly wind turbines require fossil fuel???

Eco-friendly wind turbines require fossil fuel???

twitter.com/NickAdamsinUSA/status/1543161005332627457

Attached: ff.jpg (889x382, 57.51K)

they use synthetic oil, not fossil

Well just make the electricity run on electricity damn it!

That is crude oil based.

o wow
so its ok to synthetically liberate co2

yeah just like they need to made out of non-recyclable synthetic composites that also never break down in order to be light enough to do the work needed
if you actually get into the engineering of wind power, you realize that it only produces good power at a very specific windspeed and has to be shut down when the wind is too strong or it'll tear itself apart with torque
Basically wind power is a meme, it's not good at producing consistent power. Wind turbines don't have a place in the grid, except as a supplemental power source to individual consumers in sufficiently windy areas.
Wind power is much less green than nuclear power.. arguably, it's worse than coal, but you'd really have to get into technical details to reveal that in its full glory, and most people are too stupid to understand that.

>Another Right wing grifter Petting up talking points the right is Obsession about yet have absolutly nö Club about the topics

Oh boy.
Here are some easy facts you can google/jewgle:
Solar farms produce by far the cheapest energy since 2019. Wind is second behind

No nuclear isnt some miracle technoligy because Uran is also mined in third World shitholes.

No thorium reactors dont exist. A reactor was never built and the only theoretisch machine was build 30 years ago so please stop believing in fairy Tales that thorium reactors are le based and viable

Electric cars are better than gasolie powered cars in every country except Poland (western hemisphere). You can Power your electric car with 100% reneweble energy. This results in 80% less Co2 equivelnt emiited

No Wind turbines arent buried anymore and even if they are buried they make up less than 0,1% of mass buried in us landfills.

here's another fun fact:
Wind Turbines have a maximum lifespan of 10 years
and then they bury the fucking thing in the earth and build a new one, again out of very toxic and enviormentally caustic materials

wind power is a meme designed to fool idiots
you are an idiot
and you've been fooled

You need to store the wind and solar tard so factor in storage, you can't have regular blackouts when there's no wind and sun

not to mention that they don't produce energy at all in correlation with demand, and generally have to transmit the energy over absurd distances
you're talking to a brainlet, though.. the guy isn't coming back, and even if he does he's just gonna say some normiecore nonsense and then leave abruptly

and what do they make it with you fucking tard

It's always the morons who have never had to contemplate their own existence.
I wish my life was as simple as yours; posting incorrect statistics and disingenuous surface-level talking points.

Germany is dead and I can tell brown hands wrote this post from the sheer amount of typos and IQ
>Technoligy, equivelnt, emiited, us,
Even if this is bait, the quality of it is so low and unfunny that I have no doubt you're really posting like this.
Kill yourself muhammed

>a redditor with fingolian flag
delivered

Lol 'synthetic oil' just indicates that the crude oil has been fractured and re-constituted in the image of the designers mind. IE we are looking for specific molecules to optimize the oil.
You think we're alchemically creating it from carrots or air or what some other non-crude origin?
Pathetic. Think. THINK. WHAT IS THIS? Before you go explaining things.
This is an egregious error in the cosmic sense. You need to identify and correct this behavior that allows you to categorically make statements with such a dearth of actual info.
Shouldn't you know what SyNtHeTiC oil is before you go explaining this shit to us?
Listen this is a grave error, this attitude and you'll be put into outer darkness if you persist in it.
Have a great day.

Attached: 1632219505403.jpg (576x576, 40.26K)

>You need to identify and correct this behavior that allows you to categorically make statements with such a dearth of actual info.
The entire Zoomer generation is like this.
It's going to be a massive problem.

kek
that original poster's anus is BTFO into a moebius loop after this post

Neither of those is strictly required to be derived from petroleum. Just sayin'

OK I'll bite.
Where you coming up with the hydraulic fluid?

does it matter? the components of the turbine all need petroleum to be produced
you could not produce wind turbines in a post-petroleum world, at least not the towering turbines you think of when you think "wind power"

Before I get tore up sure any of these fluids will not compress etc so technically 'any liquid' but we need to maintain all the other properties as well. Water works great in trim rams and brake lines lol.

Brake fluid is a glycol and not an oil, for one.

Me and the boys will be putting an end to this shortly.

based
revolt against modern society
a stirling thermonuclear generator in every home is the way forward

>retard just found out the (((green agenda))) is fake and gay
The purpose of the wind turbines is to kill lots and lots of birds, which will make the insect population explode. Insects eat crops. So does livestock. Do the math.
>you vil eat ze bugz