Christcucks Hjalp

>NIV.
Pretty dangerous version. I mean, 99.9% of it is just fine. But they editorialize instead of translate on very fundamental and key things. Could really throw a new Christian off. But I get what you're saying. I'd say the New King James is better if it's about digestibility.

The original version in Aramaic and Koine Greek

NASB.

KJV is grossly bad.

Attached: msedge_Tb5QAvfb2g.png (285x401, 178.34K)

Attached: 268435e10280c2dc90d9f2a18f4847b2.jpg (736x1111, 160.47K)

I also enjoy the revised standard version.

Attached: 1656556620401.jpg (1284x1678, 2.15M)

Attached: 1516746318725.png (6144x2328, 2.19M)

A version where the commandment is translated to thou shall not or you shall not MURDER rather than kill

Attached: msedge_ZpgDxassIf.png (645x973, 1.54M)

I'm mostly interested in the old testament, particularly enoch. I'm a DMT schizo and couldn't help but notice the parallels between nephilim and the joe rogan DMT demons the jews worship these days.

> KJV most accurate

lol no

>what version
KJV.

^This. King James or New King James is plenty good enough for a first Bible. It's technically a Protastant Bible, but it should tell you enough that Heretical denominations are dropping it like it's something they don't want to hear.

to be a real christian you dont have to read the bible at all, instead read christolarp.org and start larping as a jew
this is the only true way to christ
praise the nigger nose of billy finck

Slowly develop knowledge of greek, aramaic, and biblical hebrew.

My NASB sitting here shows that chart is wrong on 100% of the citations I've looked at so far.

>Focus on the new testament. It's the covenant we are on now. Don't let Protestants fool you; jews aren't the chosen people anymore, Roman Catholics are
>youtu.be/ZKiDqoUjiCI [Open]
>...Anonymous (ID: 1rLDV3WY)
>07/01/22(Fri)00:42:52 No.384716625
> (OP) #
>KJV is most accurate, expecially a physical copy printed before the 21st century. However thats not a good way for a beginner to start because its hard to digest and you'll just end up dropping it after a few days.
>Start with an easier to read version like ESV or NIV.
> #
>...Anonymous (ID: U/cfeXNe)
>07/01/22(Fri)00:44:04 No.384716745
>969 KB JPG
> #
>fpbp
>youtube.com/watch?v=YS-IjoeDuic [Open]
>...Anonymous (ID: CcJGyY3z)
>07/01/22(Fri)00:44:12 No.384716756
> (OP) #
>New King James Version. Or King James Version if the old English doesn't bother you.
>...Anonymous (ID: BxId0Mfe)
>07/01/22(Fri)00:45:13 No.384716846
> (OP) #
>Dead Sea Scrolls, the rest is garbage
>...Anonymous (ID: CcJGyY3z)
>07/01/22(Fri)00:45:38 No.384716882
> #
>>NIV.
>Pretty dangerous version. I mean, 99.9% of it is just fine. But they editorialize instead of translate on very fundamental and key things. Could really throw a new Christian off. But I get what you're saying. I'd say the New King James is better if it's about digestibility.
>...Anonymous (ID: IABaOQ0f)
>07/01/22(Fri)00:46:17 No.384716942
> (OP) #
>The original version in Aramaic and Koine Greek
>...Anonymous (ID: DUxfu3Zg)
>07/01/22(Fri)00:46:34 No.384716970
>178 KB PNG
>NASB.
>KJV is grossly bad.
>...Anonymous (ID: sQJIgaSr)
>07/01/22(Fri)00:47:01 No.384717005
>160 KB JPG
>...Anonymous (ID: BZXfb5iI)
>07/01/22(Fri)00:47:12 No.384717026
>2.15 MB JPG
> #
>I also enjoy the revised standard version.
>...Anonymous (

Attached: 9F6608BE-7EB6-4357-A348-5695D1D2A65F.jpg (1284x1011, 822.29K)

>NASB
I'll have to check this one out. Does it translate Shoel, Ghehana, and Tardarus seperately, or does it just say "hell" for all of them? Np if you don't know.

>oh no it's retarded.jpg