As most are surely aware, for more than two years I have been pointing to the strong perhaps even overwhelming evidence that the Covid outbreak that devastated our own country and the world was very likely the result of an exceptionally reckless American biowarfare attack against China (and Iran).
Under my analysis, the million American deaths and massive social disruption we have suffered would constitute the most disastrous blowback of any military operation in the history of the world, and if it became widely accepted, the domestic political consequences would be monumental.
My suggestion of a central American role in the creation of this global epidemic has been excluded not only from the mainstream media but from virtually all of the alternative media as well, presumably because the possibility is simply too horrific to contemplate. However, this situation may now be starting to change.
Last month, the prestigious journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences carried an opinion article authored by prominent Columbia University economist Jeffrey D. Sachs and a medical colleague suggesting an American role in the creation of the virus and arguing for an independent inquiry into that possibility.
Their paper also presented some of the very considerable evidence that the virus had been artificially engineered in a laboratory, providing a comparison chart noting the striking difference in structure between Covid and all of its closest natural relatives. Indeed, the former seems to have the sort of human-insert sequence that American researchers had been exploring in their scientific papers.
Your premise is lacking certain facts. The Chinese were caught stealing form Canadian and American labs. They had insider help from American universities and labs. Elements of the Chinese leadership along with globalists are the ones responsible for the virus and probably many other similar mass attacks.
you have 0 evidence that the chinks caused the virus, champ >DURR THE CHINESE STOLE STUFF so what? they always do that
Blake Cooper
>Q You mean faggot babyfist and partner in crime jim Watkins. Actual Q is over and out.
Adam Edwards
Your source is an economist and an anesthesiologist. So go find some real experts and then come back. Otherwise you might as well cite your uncle and his fishing buddy the transmission expert.
Justin Thomas
"find some real experts" confirmed for not having read the article. try again, faggot
Jacob Jackson
There is no expertise in the article, just some cock gobbler named Ron Unz citing work by two non-experts and trying to sell people his shit for $10, $8.99 and $9.99. You are truly a dumb shit.
Brayden Turner
>Their paper also presented some of the very considerable evidence that the virus had been artificially engineered in a laboratory
Man-made viruses are easy to spot. During your research did you find any studies or articles about the viral genome of COVID-CoV-2? It is pretty easy to spot man-made viruses. They will have these sites on the genome that allow it to be "clipped" and the strands of DNA will be like 2 or more "blocks" of different viral genomic sequences.
I dont practice acedemia any longer so I dont have access to free papers and I dont have the software/computer to run genomic analysis at my desk.
In addition, some research on the genomes may be difficult without data directly from the Wuhan lab.
I can, however, help you interpret stuff. What say you, user, find anything regarding the raw genomic data or analysis of the genome looking for similarities between strains or having "RE sites"?
why I say directly from Wuhan is simply because they are the global experts in coronaviruses and their genomic libraries are massive and not always published.
