Pentagon claims bitcoin is NOT decentralized

>The Pentagon says
Lol. yawn.

Hints to be looking for codes that can be used to deliver a secondary translation using different types of crypto tools like frequency, variable shift, and text block rotations

Imagine if there were more than one digital currency that people could freely choose which has better fundamentals by DYOR and not needing a government agency to pick and choose winners and losers and artificially crash markets with the stroke of a pen.

Feels good being a monerochad

Attached: Screenshot_20220626-073511_Gallery.jpg (1079x512, 375.69K)

Oh wait that was crypto before Drumph

"HOW TO MAKE A MINT: THE
CRYPTOGRAPHY OF ANONYMOUS
ELECTRONIC CASH* "

>digitalcommons.wcl.american.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1389&context=aulr

yeah, everyone in the know has known this for a while

if you want privacy, use something like Monero that is actually designed for that, not buttcoin, the first implementation of a blockchain cryptocurrency

it's worth noting there are similar concerns about TOR being able to track users if one organization controls a majority of the nodes, and systems such as I2P may be better suited if you are trying to evade nation-state actors

so close yet so far.

Underrated. The same faggots who read about "pentagon releases ufo footage" and go ZOMG AYYYYYYYYLMAOOO

Blockchains? Like all blockchains? Like even the blockchains that arnt traded as money but used as security tokens and other technologies?

Regarding tor: this is only applicable when connecting to the clearnet, because the failure point is exit/entry nodes, not relays.
Regarding monero: it is still vulnerable to 51% attacks, and worse yet: the biggest mining pool has over 51% of hashpower since feb 2022.
Monero also has a bad history with security and was repeatedly proven to be extremely insecure especially early on. The good news is that they listened and implemented various protocol upgrades to mitigate part of the attack surfaces, but monero users are in full denial mode 24/7 regarding monero's security model, which ironically makes it less safe than using e.g. btc in that participants don't' take proper safety measures, so no matter how well you perform, your peer could be selling the game downstream.

DUUUUUUUUHHHHHH
i asked every reddit faggot who used that term what "decentralized" meant.
i then asked them if they thought the same 200 people that own 80% of the literally anything in the world own 80% of buttcoin and they looked at me like i was from space.

these people are idiots. one of them told me "it's the ledger bro, everyone can see what everyone has or gets traded" but then i asked if you knew if one entity owned all the top wallets and he said "......well no i guess not".

I GUESS NOT?!

no one is informing these retarded apes of the most basic financial skepticism.

the one positive is some of them are getting redpilled in real time; it's like the kikes do their usual trick of lying and exploited media, or even just straight up changing the rules of the game THAT THEY CONROL and these retards are like "WAIT YOU MEAN THE SAME KIKES THAT OWN THE NEWS OWN EVERYTHING ELSE?!"

but not buttcoin.
no way
they don't own that

Attached: (CAN'T BOOST UP).png (1280x1556, 2.04M)

Yup. Another major problem is that bitcoin ownership itself is not the problem regarding control, but rather hashpower ownership. The top wallets are hyperlopsided, worse than USD in real life, but hashpower is about as concentrated as the (capital) power of the elites in real life, which is far much of an issue (that is the difference between capitalism and system, which is akin to an idealized communist system, except bootstrapped from an economic system, and therefore serving as a great microcosm demonstrating why communism always fails).