Reminder that the 700,000 men strong Ukrainian army trained and armed by NATO for years is getting slaughtered by a mere 150,000 strong Russian expeditionary force. How is this not proof of Russian superiority above NATO, I don't know.
Reminder that the 700...
>expeditionary force
>50 km from home terf
That isn’t an expeditionary force. A MEU is an expeditionary force. Russia can’t field a MEU equivalent. This is now a MEU thread
CH-53K heavy lifting helicopters. Excellent at ferrying supplies from ship to shore in support of combat operations or humanitarian operations
>150,000
lmao what, you have this many killed or wounded. You're drafting in fucking one-legged 80 year olds and pressganging donbabweans to make up for it.
You're like the internet equivalent of the homeless guy who gets thrown out f the supermarket for shouting at the cheese.
Devastatingly accurate and highly mobile, the HIMARS MLRS is capable of hitting targets between 5 and 500 km. The GMLRS family of guided rockets is the only mass produced guided MLRS rocket currently produced
The most important thing the MEU brings to the fight is the individual marine. Here we see a marine training on the javelin anti tank missile system. These missiles have earned a “mythical” status in the Russo-Ukrainian war for their effectiveness at killing russian armor. Murals have been painted on buildings and there has been cases of new parents even naming their children after the now legendary missile system
are you even trying?
The stinger missile earned its fame from being the weapon that forced the Soviet Union to retreat from afghanistan. Not many weapon systems are credited with ending a war but the stinger is fortunate to have earned that distinction. It’s still being put to use today and so far has multiple confirmed shootdowns of Russian aircraft in the Russo-Ukrainian war
Each MEU has water treatment specialists and equipment embarked. This can support combat operations or be used as humanitarian aid.
Each MEU has a light armored recon company attatched. 3 platoons of 4x LAV-25, 1 weapons platoon with TOW and mortar variants, and one headquarters platoon with a mix of LAV-25 and logistical variants. LAR is a very effective recon tool and the M242 25mm chaingun can kill any vehicle that isn’t the front of a MBT
>humanitarian aid.
more proof that the west is weak and dying.
Reminder;
>moskva, the flagship of russian navy in black sea
>ukraine, no worthy navy whatsoever
>somehow ukraine sunk moskva
idk
Humanitarian aid builds political points. For example, the US has global interests and humanitarian aid helps the US by allowing the US to effectively buy the will of the government being aided. Russia is a regional power and wont ever have global reach
what is cheese? some western lard substitute you morally weak trannies can actually afford?
The f-35 will ensure that the MEU has unimpeded air supremacy wherever she sails
Stop replying to this obvious troll. Just report the thread, you faggots.
Based MEUchad derailing vatnigger troll thread.
Post Severodonetsk.
No, you piece of shit. 700,000 men strong Ukrainian army trained and armed by NATO for years is getting slaughtered by grenades, rockets, and missiles, because r*ssian army is so shit, it can only achieve any gains by shelling from afar.
150k left? Out of the:
>280k regular ground forces
>45k VDV
>20k+ militias
>5k+ mercenaries
>2k special forces
>50k+ airforce
>30k+ HOMO-s and other Rossgvardia types
>5k+ Chechens
>undisclosed number of conscripts and cadets
that your entered the war with?
Grim.
The logistical leg of the MEU is extremely impressive
Why is it that even China has figured out International Aid, but Russia and India still can't?
>150,000 strong Russian expeditionary force
200,000+ was the initial Russian invasion force
Where did the 50,000+ Russians disappear to ?
>Russia STILL hasn't taken Lysychansk
You first
Obviously the MEU has some earthmovers embarked. The utility is clear for combat or humanitarian use.
So is it even good idea to field HIMARS for expedtionary force considering the logistics? Wouldn't use of howitzers be more sustainable albeit less effective?
The infantry embarked on the MEU have went through 18 months of predeployment training, and continue to train while at sea
No. Ships are massive and can store a huge amount of rocket pods. Resupply at sea can replenish those stores
it already did in Syria and Africa
With the hidden mobilization + all the mercenaries it’s far more than 150k.
And russia manage local superiority in donbass by concentrating all it’s forces there, on the other hand ukraine must guard whole belarus + russia border in case of another attack. Russia can guard it’s territory by MAD.
Furthermore, russia has largely superior firepower, which is more important than number of soldier in modern war.
One guided rocket can achieve the same goal as an entire battery. For everything closer the marines have 120, 81, and 60mm mortars
If this was true why would the russian military be doubling down on recruitment efforts and bring back retired soldiers?
Your claim makes no sense.
What's more hilarious is that the Ukrops losses are several times higher, despite being the defending side in most cases.
Embarrassing.
I’m so glad Russia doesn’t have a GMLRS equivalent. American tech is the best
Have you never been to Europe? Motherfucking cheese central. UK and France just dominate.
>he has to guide his rockets
Is the west really that pathetic?
Of course, human lives are way more valuable than Russians'.
>My source is that I made it the fuck up
What kind of bullshit backwards nonsense is this?
>Just let your allies die or you're weak
Only a Russian subhuman would think giving support is a sign of weakness and apathy towards human suffering a virtue.
They all died from Sputnik giving them ligma.
why would I go to the literal shitholes of europe? moscow is bestcow
>he doesn't know about the glorious PYCCNAn surface-to-Azov and air-to-Azov missiles
The copium in this thread is palpable
This. Russia’s new biggest export is pure Russian copium
Cope
/k/? Again?